WebProNews

Tag: Boeing

  • Boeing Goes Multicloud, Choosing Top Three Providers

    Boeing Goes Multicloud, Choosing Top Three Providers

    Boeing is increasing its investment in its cloud infrastructure, tapping the top three providers for a multicloud approach.

    AWS, Microsoft, and Google Cloud are the top three players in the cloud market, and it appears Boeing wants to work with all of them, rather than going all-in on a single one. The company “announced a significant investment” today, expanding its existing relationships with each of the companies.

    “These partnerships will strengthen our ability to test a system – or an aircraft – hundreds of times using digital twin technology before it is deployed,” said Susan Doniz, Boeing chief information officer and senior vice president of Information Technology & Data Analytics. “Our partners will help Boeing take advantage of the best the industry has to offer while enabling employees to tap into leading tools, training and experts to improve skills and learn new ones.”

    While many companies choose to build their business around a single cloud provider, many experts believe multicloud deployments are the future of the industry, and offer the best combination of reliability and scalability.

    Boeing seems to agree, citing their belief that a multicloud approach is critical to the company’s success and sustainability.

    “No one company or industry can ensure a sustainable future alone,” said Boeing Chief Sustainability Officer Chris Raymond. “We’re grateful to partner with technology leaders like AWS, Google, and Microsoft, who share our commitment to reducing carbon emissions.”

  • Boeing, Airbus Join Chorus of Airlines Calling for Halt to 5G Rollout

    Boeing, Airbus Join Chorus of Airlines Calling for Halt to 5G Rollout

    Executives from both Boeing and Airbus have joined the chorus of airline executives calling for a halt to the rollout of C-band 5G.

    As WebProNews has covered extensively, C-band is in the mid-band range of available spectrum for 5G, and is considered the sweet spot for speed, coverage, and penetration. Verizon and AT&T coughed up more than $68 billion for C-band spectrum, only to have the airline industry raise concerns the spectrum is too close to that used by aircraft altimeters.

    The FAA weighed in with new guidance limiting the use of those altimeters in low visibility conditions over fear of interference. Those efforts only raised more concerns, with United Airlines CEO saying continued rollout of the spectrum “would be a catastrophic failure of government.”

    According to Reuters, Boeing and Airbus executives are weighing in, sending a joint letter to Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg.

    “5G interference could adversely affect the ability of aircraft to safely operate,” the letter said, adding the rollout could have “an enormous negative impact on the aviation industry.”

  • Blue Origin Announces Plans for Commercial Space Station

    Blue Origin Announces Plans for Commercial Space Station

    Blue Origin, along with Sierra Space, has announced plans for a commercial space station called Orbital Reef.

    The space race is heating up, with Elon Musk’s SpaceX, Jeff Bezos’ Blue Origin and Sir Richard Branson’s Virgin Galactic some of the leading commercial companies involved. Blue Origin was recently in the headlines for a flight that included William Shatner, the oldest person to go to space.

    The company, along with Sierra Space, is now setting its sights on launching a commercial space station, one that will be “mixed use business park” in space.

    Designed to open multiple new markets in space, Orbital Reef will provide anyone with the opportunity to establish their own address on orbit. This unique destination will offer research, industrial, international, and commercial customers the cost competitive end-to-end services they need including space transportation and logistics, space habitation, equipment accommodation, and operations including onboard crew. The station will start operating in the second half of this decade.

    The project already has the backing of Boeing, Redwire Space, Genesis Engineering Solutions, and Arizona State University.

    “For over sixty years, NASA and other space agencies have developed orbital space flight and space habitation, setting us up for commercial business to take off in this decade,” said Brent Sherwood, Senior Vice President of Advanced Development Programs for Blue Origin. “We will expand access, lower the cost, and provide all the services and amenities needed to normalize space flight. A vibrant business ecosystem will grow in low Earth orbit, generating new discoveries, new products, new entertainments, and global awareness.”

    “Sierra Space is thrilled to partner with Blue Origin and provide the Dream Chaser spaceplane, the LIFE module and additional space technologies to open up space for commercial research, manufacturing, and tourism. As a former NASA astronaut, I’ve been waiting for the moment where working and living in space is accessible to more people worldwide, and that moment has arrived,” said Dr. Janet Kavandi, former three time NASA astronaut and Sierra Space president.

  • Houston, We Have a Problem: Boeing Starliner Goes Back to Factory

    Houston, We Have a Problem: Boeing Starliner Goes Back to Factory

    Boeing suffered another disappointment, as the company was forced to delay its Starliner launch, sending it back to the factory to resolve an issue.

    As private companies race to provide NASA services, as well as capitalize on the commercialization of space, Boeing has been developing a reusable capsule to ferry crew back and forth to the International Space Station (ISS). Unfortunately, Boeing’s project has been plagued with issues and delays.

    The latest issue involved four propulsion system valves that were not operating correctly, forcing the latest test to be scrubbed. Even afterward, the valves stayed closed.

    “Mission success in human spaceflight depends on thousands of factors coming together at the right time,” said John Vollmer, vice president and program manager, Boeing’s Commercial Crew Program. “We’ll continue to work the issue from the Starliner factory and have decided to stand down for this launch window to make way for other national priority missions.”

  • Amazon, Microsoft and Google Bidding on $1 Billion Boeing Cloud Contract

    Amazon, Microsoft and Google Bidding on $1 Billion Boeing Cloud Contract

    The Big Three in the cloud industry are bidding on a contract for Boeing, valued at $1 billion.

    Amazon, Microsoft and Google are the top three cloud providers and routinely try to outbid each other for major contracts. According to The Information, their latest point of competition is a multi-year cloud contract for Boeing.

    The contract has special significance for Amazon and Microsoft since both companies are based in the Seattle area, like Boeing itself. Winning the contract would give either company a big local win, and allow them to represent another local icon.

    The deal is thought to be worth at least $1 billion over the next several years.

  • Boeing CEO: For the First Time Ever We Have Backlogs of 7 Years Instead of 2

    Boeing CEO: For the First Time Ever We Have Backlogs of 7 Years Instead of 2

    The CEO of Boeing, Dennis Muilenburg, says that for the first time ever Boeing has airplane production backlogs of seven years instead of just two. He said that this demand is driven by the rising middle class throughout the world. Boeing has a current backlog of over 5,800 commercial airplanes.

    Dennis Muilenburg, Boeing CEO, recently talked about the Boeing’s growth on Fox Business:

    Growth Driven by Rising Middle Class Throughout the World

    We see traffic growth around the world as just tremendously strong right now growing at six to seven percent a year. Cargo strength has also returned year-to-date growing at about four percent. Those growth trends are out-stripping global GDP. Much of this is driven by the rising middle class throughout the world that’s really fueling the growth in this industry.

    We are ramping up production. On the 737 line, we ramped up to 52 a month this year, 57 a month next year. While we are doing that we are bringing in new innovation and new capability. The 737 MAX and the narrow body but also working on the next generation of widebodies. The 787 Dreamliner which has been very successful and we’re taking that up to 14 a month production rate next year. The 777X that we are working on will go into flight testing next year with first delivery in 2020, right on schedule. That’s important to our customers in the Asia-Pacific region as well as in the Middle East and here in the US.

    For the First Time Ever We Have Backlogs of 7 Years Instead of 2

    We have a backlog today of about 5,800 commercial airplanes. That’s the equivalent of about seven years of backlog. Our customers tend to make very long-term decisions that aren’t as much influenced by local interest rate fluctuations or oil price fluctuations. We are today selling airplanes, 737 MAX’s for example, and our production skyline out in 2023 and beyond. That’s the long-term headset of this business.

    The fact that we have that healthy backlog really allows us to think about long-term investment in the business to sustain growth. For the first time ever we have backlogs measured in about seven years instead of two. We are making long-term investments, disciplined in our production rates, so fundamentally the structure of the business has changed. We see this as a long-term sustained growth business. The growth in commercial airplane production is fueled by passenger growth around the world. We see that as a decades-long trend.

    Services Business is Our Single Biggest Growth Opportunity

    We are also growing now in our services business which is a significant additional capability for us, probably our single biggest growth opportunity. Services by its nature is a non-cyclical business which is part of this sustained growth model that we built. We just launched our new services business about a year and a half ago and year-to-date its been growing at 12 percent per year compared to a market that is growing at three percent a year. We are competing and winning at services.

    We also see our defense business as strong. One of the things that is unique about Boeing is what we call our ‘One Boeing’ approach which spans commercial services and defense and that’s providing a unique competitive advantage around the world.

    For acquisitions, we targeted areas we call verticals, things like avionics capabilities, interiors, and this past week we announced a new joint venture in auxiliary power units. These are examples of things that can grow our services business. When you think about what’s really valuable to our customers when you look through this lifecycle lense, not only how we design and build airplanes, but post-production, how do we support them and provide to our customers? That’s where we are really seeing some strong growth.

  • Boeing 767s Ordered To Be Inspected By FAA

    Boeing 767s Ordered To Be Inspected By FAA

    Boeing 767s are typically known to be among the safest planes today, and are the most popular planes in the air. The plane’s reputation may be sparkling, but the Federal Aviation Administration is taking no chances.

    The organization is ordering inspections of all Boeing 767s.

    According to a notice submitted by the FAA to the Federal Register this past Monday, there is concern over a potential problem with the rivets in moveable tail sections. Errors here could impact the plane’s ability to climb or descend safely. Not only that, the issues with the rivets could potentially result in a loss of control of the plane.

    The FAA is said to have first made a note of the concern back in 2000. The issue came up when U.S regulators stepped up inspection details in an effort to be more thorough.

    The request is seen as unusual to the point of unnecessary by some due to a lack of previously known errors or crashes related to the rivets in question on Boeing 767s.

    Some airlines have outright objected, saying that the safety demands of the FAA had been met in previous inspections. Despite the pushback, the FAA is unmoved. It has given the order, which will go into effect on March 3rd of this year. Afterwards, airlines have a window of 6 years with which to comply.

    The actual upgrade has been around for several years, as Boeing had already designed a permanent fix to the potential problem. Many airlines have already replaced the parts in question. It’s expected that the order will affect roughly 400 jets.

    As for Boeing, the company said in a statement that dealing with safety issues would be “an ongoing and continuous process” and that it was working closely with the FAA.

    Do you think the FAA is nitpicking or is this a necessary upgrade?

    Image via Wikimedia Commons

  • Delta Stock Up After Strong Holiday, New Seats

    Today Delta Air Lines announced that it will spend over $770 million through 2016 to refurbish 225 of its domestic narrowbody planes, including the Boeing 757-200, 737-800, Airbus A319 and A320 aircraft, bolstering its stock price after seeing a strong 2013 holiday.

    Planned upgrades will include the addition of slim-line seats with adjustable headrests, power at every seat, restroom overhauls and upgraded galleys for better efficiency.

    Delta, who was recently in the news for honoring a ticketing glitch which sold flights for extremely low fares, seeks to add more seats to the planes – 19 seats into the 757-200s, six on the A319s, and 10 on the A320s.

    Glen Hauenstein, executive vice president and chief revenue officer, commented in a press release, “We’re continuing to make smart long-term investments in our products and services to meet the expectations of our customers. In just six years, we will have made updates to interiors throughout Delta’s fleet giving customers improved comfort and more options to work or relax and be entertained.”

    More specific 757-200, 737-800 aircraft improvements include in-seat video, satellite TV and access to power for every passenger, as well as a 50% increase of overhead bin capacity. Delta’s A319 and A320 planes will receive new seats in both First Class and Economy cabins, with in-seat power throughout the aircraft. Updated, space-saving galleys, new heads, updated LED cabin lighting systems and a 60% increase of overhead bin capacity will also be included.

    As of 2010, Delta’s slogan has been “Keep Climbing,” which is quite a change from its 2007 post-bankruptcy slogan of “Change Is:__________.” As of writing, Delta stock is hovering just below $30, up from just above $8 a year ago. Delta stock rose $1.20, or 4.3 percent, to $28.73 last Friday, after revealing that a measure of its revenue for December rose 10 percent, after a strong late Thanksgiving holiday.

    Image via Wikimedia Commons.

  • Stuck Cargo Jet Finally Takes Flight

    “Whoa.”

    Traffic jams, road closures, car accidents, and shocked spectators. A large Boeing cargo jet was the center of a bizarre scene on Wednesday when it accidentally landed at a small airport on Kansas.

    According to the Chicago Tribune, the Dreamlifter, which took off from New York’s John F. Kennedy International Airport, was bound for McConnell Air Force Base in Wichita, Kansas but instead landed at the Colonel James Jabara Airport, a city-run airport too small to handle the 72-meter Atlas Air 747.

    “Whoa,” Wichita city officials said on Thursday in a statement posted on the city’s official Facebook page. “The plane is too large for the runway and will need help departing.”

    The Dreamlifter can carry up to 800,000 pounds on takeoff, a much heavier load than the small business planes that usually land at Jabara can carry. In fact, the Jabara runway is about 3,000 feet short of what planes of that weight and size typically use to take off.

    However, on Thursday, after a 16-hour layover, the large aircraft lifted its wheels and took off about 1:15 p.m. CST (2:15 p.m. EST) to the sound of applause from spectators and officials.

    “I think it’s hysterical. I couldn’t stop laughing,” said Kevin Schwerdtfeger, a commercial pilot in town for training. “I’ve heard of this before, but it’s fairly rare.”

    “I’m sorry for the pilots that landed there by mistake because their careers are in jeopardy,” another pilot, Steve McNulty, said.

    The 747 landed safely at McConnell, 9 miles away, twenty minutes later.

    No damage was done to the plane or to the airport.

    Boeing is still looking into how the incident happened.

    image via: Wikimedia Commons

  • Boeing 777X Contract Rejected By Machinists Union

    Boeing has said that it has no plans to re-open talks with a union representing Washington state machinists after they soundly rejected an eight-year labor contract extension on Wednesday that would have seen the company’s newest jetliner built in Washington.

    The company has however vowed not to re-open talks with the defiant workers and has said it will look very broadly at where to build the aircraft and will offer a statement in the coming months. “Boeing is keeping all options open” Boeing Commercial Airplanes Chief Executive Ray Conner told a news conference on Saturday

    The contract offered last week would have kept the production of Boeing profitable while raising the health care costs of the workers. Although the deal would have resulted in 20 years of work building Boeing 777x, the international Association of Machinists members voted 67% against the deal. The union mall was charged with cheers when the vote was announced. The union members may have given up their chance for the Boeing jobs, but they said that the contract was too grave to accept.

    One of the plans is for Boeing to consider building key parts of the 777X jetliner, including wings, outside a US state or in Japan, where it has already received an offer.

    Boeing said that they needed to strike a balance between the desire to build the jet in the state while working under a ‘competitive cost structure’.  “We are very disappointed in the outcome of the union vote,” read the Boeing statement that followed the vote.  “Without the terms of this contract extension, we’re left with no choice but to open the process competitively and pursue all options for the 777X.”

    Reacting to the vote, the president of the international Association of Machinists District 751 congratulated the members by saying they had “preserved something sacred” by voting down the contract.

    Although the company has said it is looking broadly and has already started listening to offers from other states, it hasn’t officially stated that the offer was ‘take it or leave it’ for Washington.

    (image via Wikipedia)

  • Lockheed Martin Announces SR-72, a Mach-6 Spy Plane

    In 1998, the SR-71 Blackbird spy plane was retired from service, and no plane has come anywhere near serving a similar role. With an announcement from Lockheed Martin Corp. last week, the supersonic stealth spy plane is about to reach a new renaissance with the SR-72, which media outlets are affectionately calling “Son of Blackbird.”

    The SR-71 was a twin-engine, two-seat supersonic spy plane the U.S. military built in the late 1960’s. The SR-72 is completely unmanned and flies six times faster than the speed of sound (roughly 3500 mph).

    The details of Lockheed’s new project slipped out after Aviation Week magazine ran a cover story inviting its readers to “Meet the SR-72 ‘Son of Blackbird.’ ” Here’s an image that was included with the blog:


    [Aviation Week/Lockheed Martin]

    The SR-72’s revolutionary speed permits the company to boast that the plane can reach anywhere in the world in less than an hour of flight time. Speaking with Reuters, Lockheed Martin’s hypersonic program manager Brad Leland said “Hypersonic is the new stealth… Your adversaries cannot hide or move their critical assets. They will be found. That becomes a game-changer.”

    Lockheed expects to have a prototype available in less than six years for under $1 billion in development. If that schedule is kept, fully operational SR-72s could potentially be flying in 2030. The plane is being developed in the same research lab in California that worked on the SR-71 and the famous U-2 spy plane.

    The news arrives in the wake of pressure on the Pentagon from Lockheed, Boeing, and other major defense corporations to not stop funding the development of new aircraft. The companies argued that, in spite of massive military spending cuts, the Pentagon should continue funding new development to maintain U.S. air superiority.

    If you’re interested in checking out the specifics of Lockheed’s new spy plane, the AviationWeek.com article features an enlightening series of graphics comparing the SR-72 with the SR71.

    [Main image via YouTube]

  • DARPA Just Spent $26M… On Anti-Missile Laser Beam

    According to an article in Military & Aerospace Electronics, the U.S. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency has given a total of $26 million in contracts to two U.S. defense companies to research a more efficient anti-missile defense system.

    Northrop Grumman’s Aerospace Systems division in Redondo Beach, CA will receive $14.6 million while Lockheed Martin’s Mission Systems and Training division in Akron, OH will receive $11.4 million as a part of Project Endurance. Both are engaged currently in the development of laser weapons that could successfully protect aircraft from missiles.

    Project Endurance initially sprung out of DARPA’s Excalibur program, an effort to reduce the size of optical laser arrays by at least 10 times, making it more feasible to load both manned and unmanned aircraft with a missile defense system.

    The idea for a pod-mounted laser that can fit on a plane is hardly a new one. Boeing built a tricked-out 747-400 freighter plane that it called the Airborne Laser, which was sold for scrap last year.

    At the time, researchers believed that a giant plane fitted with a megawatt laser could simply fly ovals around a combat zone and, with clever targeting, could render most ballistic missiles inert before they were fired. At-the-time Defense Secretary Robert Gates scrapped any plans the Air Force may have had to build a second one, saying “The [Airborne Laser] program has significant affordability and technology problems, and the program’s proposed operational role is highly questionable.”

    Boeing’s weapon design was a chemical iodine laser, or COIL, that was fired through the nose of the plane accompanied by two solid state lasers to lock on and control the beam. Here’s a picture of what it looked like; the tracking laser is on top, while the larger laser is on the nose, charging up.


    [YouTube]

    DARPA’s latest designs are a bit smaller and less cumbersome by leaps and bounds. However, they are the first to admit that the size limitations are affecting the power output of their laser. By combining two different types of laser systems (diode lasers and fiber laser amplifiers), DARPA hopes to increase beam efficacy by between 30 and 50 percent.


    [DARPA]

    “To produce a weapons-grade system, however,” Excalibur program manager Joseph Mangano writes, “[the laser’s] output power must be increased without introducing additional optical phase noise and modal instability.” Basically, they won’t be aiming for a Boeing-sized megawatt laser, but a couple hundred kilowatts might be enough to get the job done.

    [Main image via DARPA]

  • Boeing 777X Aircraft to be Built in Multiple Locales

    Since its inception in the 1910’s, Boeing airplanes have been designed, engineered, and constructed in the Puget Sound area of Washington. Over the years, Boeing has established factories in several other locations in order to produce more parts, but the design, engineering, and overall construction has always been conducted at the Seattle-area warehouse. However, times are a-changin’.

    In an internal memo to its employees, Boeing stated that “It has been decided that much of the detailed design will be carried out by Boeing engineering teams in Charleston (South Carolina), Huntsville (Alabama), Long Beach (California), Philadelphia and St. Louis.” Boeing’s Design Center in Moscow, Russia, will also be involved. Boeing continued the memo by asserting, “However, at this time, no decisions have been made about 777X design or build in Puget Sound.”

    The move to other locations serves as a severe blow to the state of Washington. The governor of Washington, Jay Inslee, called Boeing’s decision “disappointing” and promised to “compete boldly and aggressively to win this work.” The effort of Washington’s governor will most likely not impact the decision of Boeing, though, seeing as their main beef centers around the SPEEA – the Society of Professional Engineering Employees in Aerospace.

    After bitter negotiations concerning prices and wages with the SPEEA last fall, Boeing declared that it would seek to move its services elsewhere if the engineers’ union forced an even more expensive contract.

    Despite the fact that Boeing has announced that it will be producing parts of the plane elsewhere, Ray Goforth, executive director of the SPEEA, stated that “Boeing just doesn’t have the capacity anywhere else, frankly,” due to the technological innovations that are needed and only located in the Puget Sound operations: “I think there’s no doubt Puget Sound will play the key integrating role,” Goforth said.

    According to the Seattle Times, the decision to move some of the construction processes to other plants also derives from massive Pentagon budget cuts, leading to layoffs and a surplus of engineers in Huntsville, Al, Philadelphia, Pa, and Southern California.

    When constructing the Boeing 787 Dreamliner, Boeing also decided to outsource some of the key parts to the plane. In this instance, the decision was not wise as the plane was delayed due to being plagued by many issues, such as the battery overheating. This time, though, Boeing says that it has learned its lessons from the 787 and that the new design of the 777X “will allow for an efficient use of resources and enable Boeing to resolve design issues effectively the first time.”

    The newest version of the 777 will feature the largest engines ever from GE and new composite wings that will create much better fuel efficiency – the earliest model of the 777X, the 777-9X, will be able to fly 400+ passengers over 8,000 nautical miles while consuming 20% less fuel than the current version of the 777. The 400 person carrying-capacity is about 50 passengers more than Boeing’s largest plane can currently carry.

    Expectations for the new 777X are high based on early consumer interest. While Boeing lost a huge deal with Japan Airlines to Airbus earlier this year, it is currently in talks with four airliners to close a deal worth approximately $87 billion dollars. The deal is being structured around the Dubai Airshow and includes the purchase of 255 planes – 100-150 for Emirates, 50 for Qatar Airways, and 30 for Etihad Airways.

    If the deal is completed, it will be Boeing’s largest ever sale for a new-model plane.

    Image via Facebook

  • Boeing 747 May Get 86’d in the Years to Come

    The Boeing 747 Jumbo Jet has been hailed as a double-decker revolution in air travel that shrank the globe by the Associated Press, yet even Arsenio Hall seems able to offer one as a (seemingly unattainable) prize on his new show.

    Despite that glowing remark from the AP, Boeing has had to cut its 747 production line two times in the last six months, and the flying corporate giant will only end up producing 36 of the iconic planes in the next two years.

    That weak performance does not dampen Boeing’s commitment to the 747; it plans to try to sell the jets to Asia like it sold its only five 747’s this year, but most Asia-based airlines are looking for cheaper, two-engine planes that will make the same trip for less fuel.

    Even Delta Airlines CEO Richard Anderson joined them in their preference when he said at a press conference, “Now jet engines are amazing, amazing machines and you only need two of them.”

    A Boeing 747 can seat between 380 and 560 people depending on how a particular airline company chooses to arrange its layout, but it’s considered cumbersome because of its four engines. A full 747 really brought in the bacon, but a plane that fails to fill every seat has to spread a $200,000 jet fuel cost across the passengers they still have.

    The jumbo size is too big for most markets, it seems. The AP wrote that no airline could financially justify regional jumbo jet flights between Paris, France and Atlanta, GA, for example, and that business passengers prefer multiple flights for the sake of flexibility, making it more feasible for airlines to run small planes instead of the 747.

    The Boeing 747 was, upon its construction, a six-story engineering marvel that could safely carry several hundred people 6,000 miles. The model became particularly famous for piggybacking NASA’s space shuttles around as well as the POTUS in the form of Air Force One.

    [Image via a National Geographic YouTube video]

  • Airbus Lands Historic Deal with Japan Airlines

    Boeing found itself losing its essential monopoly on the Japanese aerospace market Monday morning as Japan Airlines (JAL) signed a deal with Airbus worth $294.5 billion. The deal is for 31 wide-body A350 jets, with the future option to purchase 25 more at the same price.

    The deal comes as a huge blow to Boeing, having dominated the market in Japan since it began its post-war reconstruction. Japan also manufactures part of Boeing planes, with production in Japan accounting for one-third of the manufacturing of the Boeing 787.

    Many have suspected that Japan’s decision stems from the issues surrounding the launch of the Boeing 787 Dreamliner. During the development phase, Boeing’s Dreamliner was delayed for years. After its launch, the 787 had to be grounded for a period of 4 months due to issues with its battery overheating. Japan was directly affected by these issues, seeing as it is one of the largest Dreamliner operators.

    Despite the delays and issues with the 787, JAL president Yoshiharu Ueki stated that this deal with Airbus is not due to those problems: “We are sorry for the troubles we have caused our customers with the 787, but the decision on the aircraft was considered separately from that issue.”

    So why did JAL decided to jump plane with Boeing and switch to Airbus? One main reason may be the price. Because the deal was so large, Airbus most likely cut JAL a bulk-purchase deal. However, that bargain may be larger than most think: “They may have been sold at cost, or below cost,” said Will Horton, senior analyst at CAPA Centre for Aviation.

    Horton bases this assumption on the fact that Airbus is fairly desperate to break into the Asian market. Japan represents the 3rd largest GDP in the world, and before this deal Airbus only had a 13% market-share; after the deal was signed, Airbus increased their presence to 20%.

    The other reason JAL may have sided with Airbus is due to diversity. Just as ecosystems need biodiversity, markets need product-diversity. By having at least two different plane suppliers in its market, Japan ensures future stability and price-negotiations, something the monopoly by Boeing did not offer the country.

    While this deal comes as a huge blow to Boeing, the company does not have any plans on shying away from the Japanese market: “Although we are disappointed with the selection, we will continue to provide the most efficient and innovative products and services that meet longer-term fleet requirements for Japan Airlines. We have built a strong relationship with Japan Airlines over the last 50 years and we look to continue our partnership going forward.”

    This deal may be a symptom of a larger problem than just those of Boeing. JAL may be investing in Airbus to avoid investing in an American market during a government shutdown. While Boeing did have its fair share of issues with the 787 Dreamliner, Japan would have to have a large incentive to turn away from a company which provides hundreds of jobs to its own citizens. The on-going government shutdown, along with an unstable and unpredictable market, may have been that incentive.

    Image via Twitter

  • Boeing Dreamliner: What is Being Done About Issues?

    Boeing is taking responsibility for improving reliability in its 787 Dreamliner, which has had many issues in past months, according to Reuters. The most recent of these being a plane, from Poland’s LOT airline, that had to make an emergency landing at Keflavik airoport in Reykjavik, Iceland.

    The problem this time was with the antenna that transmits the plane’s identification, in order to be granted permission to use air space. Without this system, planes have to be granted pre-approval from flight control directly.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o8hDWSg16o0

    Since the plane couldn’t be identified right away, Norwegian authorities refused permission to fly through their airspace. Boeing’s Dreamliner was expected to somewhat revolutionize air travel, but has, so far, seen too many hiccups for comfort. So what is Boeing doing to make things right?

    “LOT has already made the proper arrangements and parts and personnel are en route to address the issue and return the airplane to flight status,” Boeing spokesman Marc Birtel said in a statement sent to Reuters. “Boeing stands ready to help if asked.”

    Boeing Commercial Airplanes Marketing Vice President Randy Tinseth at a press conference in Chile’s capital Santiago said,

    “Today, the reliability of the 787 is better than 95 percent. It’s not as good as we’d like to see it. It’s not as good as our customers would like to see it. So we’re looking at ways to improve that reliability over time. I would refer to the problems as teething problems, I don’t think they’re systemic,”

    According to Reuters, Tinseth suggested the process of improving reliability could be a long one. Many new airplanes have issues right after being introduced. Take for example, the Airbus A380 Superjumbo. That one had cracks in the wings, but the problem was fixed and the memory faded over time. Hopefully that will be the case for the Boeing 787, and it can go on changing the game in air travel.

    Image via youtube

  • F-15 Silent Eagle Rejected by South Korea

    Reuters via the CS Monitor reported today that South Korea has voted down a bid from Boeing to sell the country 60 F-15 Silent Eagles in favor of starting the process again to get a better fighter.

    Although the F-15 was the only plane to fit the south Korean budget initially, the ruling party’s lawmakers and former military officials have all criticized the plane’s mediocre stealth effectiveness. Specifically, the AFP noted that the F-15 was unable to evade radar like an EADS Eurofighter Typhoon or a Lockheed Martin F-35A Joint Strike Fighter.

    South Korean Defense Ministry spokesman Kim Min-seok, speaking about the need for better jets, said “Our air force thinks that we need combat capabilities in response to the latest trend of aerospace technology development centered around the fifth generation fighter jets and to provocations from North Korea.”

    Lockheed Martin’s F-35A Joint Strike Fighter is the next jet South Korea is considering buying, although its advanced stealth capabilities were initially considered out of Seoul’s budget range. The F-35A JSF has been ordered by seven countries: Japan, Israel, Britain, Australia, Italy, Norway, and Turkey.

    South Korea may take up to a year to fashion a budget that would include room for new fighters, but South Korea’s Defense Acquisition Program Administration, or DAPA (the organization responsible for assessing the fighters), said that it “will swiftly pursue the program again in order to minimize the vacuum in combat capabilities.”

    In the meantime, Lockheed Martin plans to try and lower the costs of the F-35A in the wake of increased production. “We will continue to support the U.S. government in its offer of the F-35A to Korea,” a Lockheed Martin representative to South Korea said.

    Boeing seems to be the loser of the deal, as the company spent out-of-pocket to develop the Silent Eagle variant of the F-15. While it’s not yet known whether Boeing will file suit, a DAPA official commented that South Korea had followed the rules regarding the bidding process.

    [Image via a Boeing marketing video specifically created for the F-15 Silent Eagle on YouTube]

  • Last Boeing C-17 Delivered To U.S. Air Force

    Last Boeing C-17 Delivered To U.S. Air Force

    The well-known aerospace corporation Boeing has had a long relationship with the United States Air Force since the Cold War, and it is also a big supplier of planes to the Air Force as well. This past Thursday marked a milestone for this relationship when Boeing delivered its final model of the C-17 (Globemaster III) to the Air Force’s military officials, along with holding a ceremony to commemorate this event.

    A description from Boeing’s website of the C-17 Globemaster III is provided below, along with the reason why this model is so important to the Air Force.

    “The C-17 Globemaster III is a high-wing, four-engine, T-tailed aircraft with a rear loading ramp. In 1980, the U.S. Air Force asked for a larger transport that could be refueled in flight and use rough forward fields so that it could fly anywhere in the world.”

    According to Boeing’s description, the corporation accepted this challenge, and in 1981, McDonnell Douglas (who later merged with Boeing in the 90’s) won the contract and proposal to build the C-17. With this contract, the specifications of the C-17 met and exceed the Air Force’s expectations.

    At this past Thursday’s ceremony to commemorate the last C-17 to be produced for the Air Force, many Boeing employees attended, along with Bob Grech, who has been involved with the C-17 project for the past 19 years. Grech stated, “It was a long run with the U.S. military, and it was a good run.” Rachid Ali, an avionics inspector for the C-17, was also present at the ceremony and praised the C-17’s performance, saying, “It’s an awesome airplane. Capability, reliability, it’s above and beyond. The first 50 are still flying. After 25 years, you can refurbish them and they’re as good as new. It’s going to be in the air for years to come.” (Source: Yahoo News)

    Following the ceremony, the final C-17 that was delivered to the USAF took to the air en route to the Air Force Base in Charleston, S.C. The reason for the C-17’s destination was to recreate the same flight that took place during the first C-17’s maiden voyage. Coming in for a landing, an airmen took a great picture of the C-17 getting ready to touch ground as shown in the tweet below.

    [Image source: Twitter]

  • Boeing 787 Dreamliner Fire a ‘Serious Incident”

    Boeing 787 Dreamliner Fire a ‘Serious Incident”

    Britain’s Air Accidents Investigation Branch (AAIB) classified the fire that started on a Boeing 787 Dreamliner at Heathrow Airport in London on Friday as a “serious incident.”

    The “serious incident” classification is a step below an “accident” on the investigator’s scale for categorizing cases, according to a Reuters report.

    The fire started on the Ethiopian Airlines plane while it was parked at Heathrow, eight hours after it arrived from Addis Ababa. There were no passengers on the plane and no one was injured. Both of Heathrow’s runways were shut down for more than an hour due to the incident, but no flights were affected Saturday.

    The cause of the fire has not been determined.

    “There has been extensive heat damage in the upper portion of the rear fuselage, a complex part of the aircraft, and the initial investigation is likely to take several days,” the AAIB said in a statement.

    The AAIB has not found evidence that the fire was caused by problems with the plane’s batteries. Boeing’s Dreamliners were out of commission for three months earlier this year because of battery issues.

    The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), USA, representing the State of Design and Manufacture, and the Civil Aviation Authority of Ethiopia, representing the State of Registry and Operator, were invited to appoint representatives to participate in the investigation, according to a statement by the AAIB. Advisors from the Federal Aviation Administration, Boeing Commercial Airplanes and Ethiopian Airlines will also participate.

    Boeing addressed the incident on Twitter on Friday.

    The aircraft is being stored in a hangar at Heathrow while the technical investigation into the cause of the fire is conducted.

  • “Son of Concorde” To Fly Twice As Fast As Concorde

    Until the fatal 2000 crash that signaled the beginning of the end for the Concorde, it was widely considered the pinnacle of consumer based aviation. The Supersonic plane could fly from London to New York in half the time that a typical jet did it because it flew at supersonic speeds. The trip was not inexpensive though. Since the grounding and retirement of the great plane, the need and want for another commercial plane that travels faster than the speed of sound is both wanted and needed.

    Boeing, Lockheed Martin, Gulfstream and NASA are working on a collaborative effort called the “Son of Concorde” that has the potential to get from London to Sydney in 4 hours! The plane would obviously have to be a Scramjet hypersonic plane that NASA and the Air Force are currently working on and would have to be able to go into the low atmosphere.

    The biggest obstacle that the companies are facing is overcoming the sonic boom problem that planes face when they go faster than the speed of sound. According to the Daily Mail a Gulfstream engineer described the sound the new jet will make as “closer to a puff or plop.” The new aircraft Codenamed X-54, will ‘prove that an aircraft can be shaped for low sonic boom’

    The 12-seat planes are expected to cost $80 million each and are being marketed to European and Middle East buyers under the slogan, ‘To the USA and back in a working day.’ Look for the jets to be in use by 2020-2030 if they are ever in use at all!

    Picture comes courtesy of the Daily Mail and is an artists rendition

  • Super Secretive X-37B Space Plane To Land [Infographic]

    After the shuttle program ended, spaceflight dominance for the United States looked to be in jeopardy. Then came the X-37B. This mini space shuttle looks like it could be the future of what we can look forward to in the near future for military space aircraft. The X-37B is a reusable shuttle with a payload bay about the size of a pickup truck. The shuttle which is about to come back down is also unmanned and has been orbiting the earth for over a year.

    With this new highly secretive space plane, the Air Force has a highly reusable and very sturdy aircraft to help protect the interests of the United States. The exact mission the X-37B was on is a mystery, but according to General William Shelton, commander of Air Force Space Command it was a success saying this: “Although I can’t talk about mission specifics, suffice it to say this mission has been a spectacular success.”

    At this time it is not exactly sure how exactly the X-37B will be used, or how often it will be used. All we do know is that it keeps America at the top of the Earth based space food chain.

    The X37-B is the latest in a fairly long line of space vehicles. Check out this informative infographic on the subject: