Julie Chen seems to be as excited as the rest of us that Big Brother is getting ready to premiere next week.
As the show’s host, Julie Chen gets the early dish on what the guests will be doing and, more importantly, where they’ll be staying.
Julie Chen got to tour this season’s house recently and took along Entertainment Tonight‘s Kevin Frazier.
The Big Brother house looks amazing and even Julie Chen seemed impressed!
The house has a very beachy feel to it and includes fun touches like a wave wall that stretches 22 feet into the air and a 155 foot skybridge lounge with a plexiglass floor.
Julie Chen said of this particular feature, “This sky bridge lounge has a very Vegas-y feel to it, except what happens in the Big Brother house doesn’t stay in the Big Brother house.”
Not even close.
To make sure nothing stays a secret, the house is also fully equipped with 122 two-way mirrors, 80 cameras, and 100 microphones.
I just couldn’t live like that! Well, maybe I could. Temporarily. For $500,000.
Julie Chen pointed out the second purpose for all of those two-way mirrors, saying, “We’re always on our toes as to when is it appropriate for us to jump in or jump out.”
Of course, Julie Chen will continue on in her role as a co-host of The Talk.
When Julie Chen was asked about what would happen if The Talk and Big Brother were to combine, she had some surprising ideas.
Julie Chen said, “I definitely would want an alliance with Sara Gilbert.”
Good choice! Sara definitely doesn’t seem to be the type that would go down quickly without a fight.
She added, “Who would I want out first? You can’t vote out one of your besties. I’d just leave it up to Sara.”
I don’t know if that plan would work out for Julie Chen or not! But, it sounds pretty entertaining for the rest of us!
Are you ready to see Julie Chen on Big Brother again?
Ariana Grande lost her beloved grandfather, 90-year-old Frank Grande, this past week to cancer, and even watched her brother, Frankie Grande–a Big Brother contestant–receive the news while on the show. Both the Problem singer and her brother–as well as their whole family–are now in mourning.
Ariana appreciated all the support she received from her friends and family, as well as from her fans all around the world. They reached out to her via social media and she made a point of reaching back. She also shared memories and photos of her beloved grandfather.
The former Sam & Cat star shared a very poignant shot of her visiting her grandfather in his final days. She flew to Boca Raton over the 4th of July holiday and spent some quality time with him.
She captioned it very simply, ‘I love you.’
She also shared some shots of her very handsome grandfather during his younger days. This one is captioned ‘frank & babe late 40’s.’ Babe is Ariana Grande’s grandmother.
And then she posted this solo shot of Frank Grande. He really was a very handsome man.
This beautiful photo features Ariana Grande and her grandfather enjoying happy times together.
These photos will forever be treasures to Ariana now that her grandfather is gone. She no doubt realizes she was blessed to have him and is proud of him for fighting his cancer battle. At ninety, perhaps it was simply his time to go.
Ariana has a heart filled with grace. That is quite evident in the message she shared with all those who prayed for her and cried with her during this most difficult time.
thank you for your continuous love & light over the past few weeks… we did lose my favorite person to ever exist yesterday, my grandpa :'(
In time Ariana Grande will come to view these precious photos with a smile on her face and a sense of love in her heart. Yes, the mourning is painful, but in time it will lift and leave behind a feeling of peace and of knowing that she took the time to be with her grandfather during his last days.
Ariana Grande has used her Instagram and Twitter feeds to craft what constitutes an emotional good-bye to her grandfather, who passed away on Tuesday.
This morning Grande announced that her grandfather had lost his battle with cancer and thanked her fans for their support throughout his illness: “thank you for your continuous love & light over the past few weeks… we did lose my favorite person to ever exist yesterday, my grandpa.”
The singer and Sam & Cat star pulled herself together long enough to appear on Good Morning America this morning alongside Ryan Seacrest. The two were promoting the upcoming iHeart Radio Festival at which Grande will perform among a line-up that includes Cold Play, One Direction, Paramore, Ed Sheeran, Taylor Swift, and Usher.
Grande looked like she was having a hard time keeping a smile on her face during the interview.
Via Twitter, she told her fans that the “only reason I made this twelve hour trip is grandps told me he wanted me to always be professional & fulfill my business commitments.”
if only y'all knew how amazing he was.. my heart hurts so much. It's beyond broken :'( but I got to hold his hand and watch him find his peace
Grande, a frequent tweeter who interacts heavily with her fans on the social network, has been keeping the world updated on the status of her grandfather’s health for a while now.
my heart!!… he is an inspiration & a fighter. if he can do THIS at his age…we can conquer anything… keep doing it grandps. we love u!!
Grande’s brother Frankie is currently a contestant on Big Brother. She said her grandfather didn’t want Frankie to leave the show in order to spend time with him in his final weeks:
thank u for the prayers. my loves u are so powerful… u are in my heart. i wish Frankie were here. grandpa said "no he gotta win the game!"
Former heavyweight champion Evander Holyfield has ignited controversy on the UK’s ‘Celebrity Big Brother’ due to his views on homosexuality. Holyfield made inflammatory comments toward gays on Saturday’s airing of the British reality TV show. He compared homosexuality to a handicap that can be fixed by a doctor.
Holyfield is among the contestants on “Celebrity Big Brother” UK and made the remarks while holding a conversations with fellow housemate Luisa Zissman.
In the conversation, Zissman disagrees with Holyfield and tries to sway his opinion but Holyfield stood firm. Zissman even tries to end the conversation at one point but Holyfield remained insistent in showing Zissman why homosexuality is not a sexual orientation but a deformity.
Holyfield: The bible lets you know, that’s wrong, that’s right.
Zissman: That’s just the way some people are.
Holyfield: No, it don’t make no difference. If you were born and your leg were turned this way, what do you do, you go to the doctor and get it fixed back right.
Afterwards, Holyfield was taken by the show’s producers to a private room where he was advised that his views were not acceptable and it would be offensive for him to continue expressing those views. However, Holyfield still was of the view that he hadn’t done anything wrong but promised to refrain in future.
The remarks generated mixed reactions from the social media with many users expressing outrage towards the 51-year-old boxing legend. However, openly gay Culture Club singer Boy George could not hide his disappointment at Holyfield’s comments. George issued a statement on Twitter saying: “Shame, I had such admiration for Mr Evander Holyfield, he seemed dignified and I was sure he was a cool, smart, giant!”
Shame, I had such admiration for Mr Evander Holyfield, he seemed dignified and I was sure he was a cool, smart, giant!
Though Holyfield is entitled to his opinion, anti-gay sentiments are not likely to go over well with the public. He may want to keep his opinion to himself or risk alienating many of his fans.
Edward J. Snowden, the former National Security Agency contractor, said in an interview this month that when he fled to Russia from Hong Kong SAR, China, in June, he did not take any classified NSA files with him.
Snowden further assured that Russian espionage agents had no way of getting access to the files, as he handed over all those documents to the journalists he met in Hong Kong, and did not make any duplicate copies for himself, “because it wouldn’t serve the public interest.”
“What would be the unique value of personally carrying another copy of the materials onward?…There’s a zero percent chance the Russians or Chinese have received any documents,” he added.
Snowden was also confident about China’s intelligence capabilities, claiming that as an NSA contractor he had extensively targeted the eastern giant’s espionage operations and even taught a course on Chinese cyber-counterintelligence.
American espionage and covert operations officials have condemned Snowden as a traitor, and have asserted that Chinese and Russians might have gotten access to the files.
The interview took place over several days last week in a “safe” location in Russia, where Snowden has been granted political asylum. The interview took place through encrypted online communications.
Snowden, 30, has been praised by Constitutionalists and privacy advocates while Federal government has slapped charges on him under the Espionage Act for leaking the files. The famous fugitive claimed that he was acting in “nation’s” best interests, by revealing NSA’s omniscient surveillance efforts including conversations, emails, purchase habits, etc, and pleaded for vigorous national public debate about mass surveillance and monitoring of Americans.
Snowden said,
“The secret continuance of these programs represents a far greater danger than their disclosure…So long as there’s broad support amongst a people, it can be argued there’s a level of legitimacy even to the most invasive and morally wrong program, as it was an informed and willing decision,” he said. “However, programs that are implemented in secret, out of public oversight, lack that legitimacy, and that’s a problem. It also represents a dangerous normalization of ‘governing in the dark,’ where decisions with enormous public impact occur without any public input.”
Snowden’s last target as NSA contractor was China, and he had “access to every target, every active operation” mounted by NSA against the Chinese, including:
“ Full lists of them. If that was compromised,…N.S.A. would have set the table on fire from slamming it so many times in denouncing the damage it had caused. Yet N.S.A. has not offered a single example of damage from the leaks. They haven’t said boo about it except ‘we think,’ ‘maybe,’ ‘have to assume’ from anonymous and former officials. Not ‘China is going dark.’ Not ‘the Chinese military has shut us out.’ ”
Snowden also feared that working through proper channels utilizing the chain of command would lead to swift gagging and retribution. In 2008 and 2009, while working in Geneva as an IT officer for CIA, he pushed for a promotion, but got into a “petty e-mail spat” over a senior manager’s judgment.
When Snowden discovered serious vulnerabilities in a CIA software, he warned his supervisor, but was advised to keep his mouth shut. After much haggling, he was allowed to test the system with a “non-malicious” code, which proved that the system was in fact vulnerable. But this time, someone higher up in the chain of command was annoyed and gave Snowden a bad review in his personnel file.
Snowden feared that he would be persecuted and stigmatized like former NSA employee Thomas A. Drake, who, like Snowden, had exposed NSA’s wrongdoings. He added that dissent was crushed or suppressed using “fear and a false image of patriotism.”
Edward Snowden lamented that had he raised the issue of unconstitutional surveillance as an insider, his complaints “would have been buried forever,” and he would “have been discredited and ruined…the system does not work…you have to report wrongdoing to those most responsible for it.”
Alarmed by a highly classified 2009 report he chanced upon at the agency, he concluded that, “If the highest officials in government can break the law without fearing punishment or even any repercussions at all…secret powers become tremendously dangerous…You can’t read something like that and not realize what it means for all of these systems we have.”
Snowden is permitted to stay in Russia for one year, but his future appears perilous after this sojourn. Benjamin Franklin once remarked that, “those who sacrifice liberty for security, deserve neither.”
Cancer. Every parent fears hearing this word, especially when it comes to their children. This is a reality that Britney Haynes, the former “Big Brother” competitor and star, has had to come to terms with after her 2-month-old daughter was diagnosed with this horrible disease.
Haynes shared the heart wrenching news via Facebook saying: “On September 1st, we were among the daily 720 sets of parents to be absolutely devastated with a Childhood Cancer diagnosis. September is National Childhood Cancer Awareness month. Please take the time to pray for all these children, our sweet baby included. We appreciate each and every one.”
Haynes’ daughter,Tilly Elizabeth, was born on July 13. After her birth Haynes tweeted: “My life changed on July 13th and will never be the same! My sweet little girl is happy, healthy, and amazing. Tilly Elizabeth; 8lbs 3oz!”
Haynes more recently took to Twitter to thank everyone for their thoughts and prayers for their little girl.
Haynes appeared on the CBS series, “Big Brother” in 2010 and 2012.
A fundraiser has been set up for people to donate to the Haynes family for their medical expenses. You can contribute to the fund by visiting http://gogetfunding.com/project/pray-for-tilly#/project_details. So far they have 152 backers and have raised $3,300.
A cast member on the new season of “Big Brother” has been fired from her job as pageant coordinator for East Coast USA Pageant, Inc. after cameras caught her using racial slurs–including the “N” word–and exhibiting behavior that the company deemed “shocking”.
Ginamarie Zimmerman and her housemates have gotten themselves into trouble with their onscreen antics of use of horrifyingly racist language–another woman tells an Asian contestant to “shut up and go make some rice”–and are now paying the price.
“The East Coast USA Pageant is an outlet for girls and women to gain self-confidence announce their platform and most importantly celebrate who they are. We believe and teach our contestants that beauty comes from within. We celebrate the diversity of our participants as all ethnicities are beautiful. We have never known this side of Ginamarie or have ever witnessed such acts of racism in the past,” Lauren Handler, the National Director and CEO East Coast USA Pageant, said in a statement. “We are actually thankful that this show let us see Ginamarie for who she truly is as we would never want her to be a role model to our future contestants. It is unfortunate that her hateful words were able to be witnessed by so many thousands of Big Brother fans as they were rightfully so deeply offended. We are unable to contact her at this time but when she returns from the Big Brother house we will be terminating her employment for her unforgivable behavior. In a business where we are surrounded by beauty every day we are saddened to see something so ugly come from someone we put on a very high pedestal.”
Sadly, the latest group of “Big Brother” contestants aren’t the first ones to use offensive language; back in 2008, Adam Jasinski was fired from his job with the United Autism Foundation after he called autistic children “retards”. CBS has released a statement on the behavior of their cast members, saying:
“Big Brother is a reality show about watching a group of people who have no privacy 24/7—and seeing every moment of their lives. At times, the houseguests reveal prejudices and other beliefs that we do not condone.”
Big Brother 2013 premiered last night, and the 14-year-old reality TV series is proving that it still has a few new ideas to play around with.
The newest season of Big Brother introduced us to 16 contestants who are all competing to win $500,000. As in past seasons, the contestants are not allowed to have any contact with the outside world, and half the fun is watching them interact with complete strangers while slowly going mad.
As for the new ideas, the latest season of Big Brother has introduced a new rule that allows three contestants to be nominated for conviction, instead of the usual two. Viewers are also encouraged to participate this time around by voting on which housemate they feel will do the best time around.
The most important element of Big Brother has always been the cast, and this year’s show gathers a wide variety of people from varying walks of life. Below are their respective names, ages and occupations:
Aaryn Gries – 22-year-old college student
Amanda Zuckerman – 28-year-old real estate agent
Andy Herren – 26-year-old professor
Candice Stewart -29-year-old pediatric speech therapist
Nearly everyone knows what the phrase “Big Brother” means in a political discussion – a government that keeps a close eye on its people’s comings and goings, a surveillance state. Surprisingly few people these days know that the phrase comes from George Orwell’s dystopian science fiction novel, 1984.
That, it seems, is rapidly changing. In the wake of recent revelations regarding the NSA’s surveillance of American citizens the book has shot up Amazon’s bestseller rankings. One edition – the centennial edition – has seen sales increase by a staggering 5,800%, moving from 7,397th to 125th. Another edition has moved from 810th in the rankings to 209th. Other booksellers have reported similar spikes in sales, including Barnes & Noble and The Strand in New York City. The book is currently 43rd in the iBooks store’s top books list.
The book, in case you haven’t read it, tells the story of a totalitarian government run by the mysterious dictator Big Brother. The government engages in extensive surveillance and mind control of the populace (hence the phrase “Big Brother is watching you,” which appears on propaganda materials in the book).
1984 isn’t the only book to enjoy a boost in sales thanks to the NSA scandal. Other dystopian novels have seen similar, if not as striking, surges, including Orwell’s other classic, Animal Farm, Ray Bradbury’s Fahrenheit 451, and Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World.
So, on the down side, it turns out that the government is paying way more attention to your business than (almost) anybody thought. On the bright side, a whole new generation of readers are being introduced to some literary classics. So there’s that.
If you’ve been anywhere near the internet in the last couple days, you are probably aware of the recent government surveillance scandals. It started yesterday with the revelation that the government was collecting data from Verizon customers phone calls (all of them). And if that wasn’t Big Brother-y enough for you, news broke this morning about the NSA’s secret PRISM program, which gathers data from the servers a shocking array of the most popular and ubiquitous tech companies: Facebook, Google, Apple, Microsoft, and more.
Unsurprisingly, this double-whammy of privacy scandals has prompted a number of unfavorable comparisons between the Obama administration and the Bush administration. As you may recall, the Bush administration came under fire repeatedly for programs – including warrantless wiretapping of suspected terrorists – that were seen as violations of the civil rights of American citizens. These comparisons have run the gamut from articulate and well-thought to… less so (as you might expect from the internet). None, perhaps, is as simple and succinct as the Huffington Post’s front page image from yesterday.
The image, which you can see above, consists of the title “GEORGE W. OBAMA” and a blending of a photo of former President Bush with a photo of President Obama. The image is quite well done, and surprisingly unsettling, as though my brain can’t decide who it thinks I’m looking at.
The president, who has long been reluctant to discuss government surveillance programs, finally spoke out in defense of the two controversial programs today, claiming that the programs were necessary, and that they carried on under the watchful eye of Congress, which he said could stop the programs easily if it felt there were abuses.
How comforting you find that depends, I suppose, on how much you trust Congress.
Verizon is moving into the targeted ad business in a big way. The wireless carrier announced a new campaign yesterday called Verizon Selects that would allow them to share a customer’s info with advertisers. Now the carrier has patented a device that makes its previous tracking efforts seem sophomorish in comparison.
Ars Technica reports that Verizon has just filed a patent for a DVR that comes equipped with a camera and mic. What would the camera be used for? It would spy on you day and night, collect information about your habits and deliver targeted ads based upon that information. It’s an advertiser’s dream come true, and everybody else’s worst Orwellian nightmare.
The patent filing lists a number of actions and objects that the camera and mic would be able to detect. It would be used to detect the usual objects like the number of people present and what they’re saying and doing. It goes into some weirder territory later on, however, when it says that they would want it to detect pets or the products being used by people, like a specific brand of chips.
Ars points to a particular example of how a camera and mic would be used in conjunction to deliver targeted ads to a couple. If the mic picks up sounds of fighting, it would deliver an ad for relationship counseling. Likewise, sounds of cuddling would present an ad for contraceptives.
Realistically speaking, this kind of tech is likely to never make it to market. US citizens have an expectation of privacy, and blatantly infringing upon that makes people angry. Verizon, or anybody else who has patented similar technologies, could sneak it to market, but the potential backlash is just too risky.
ABC’s new show, “Glass House”, is so much like a certain competitor network’s cash cow “Big Brother” that it has started an all-out, balls-to-the-wall fight of epic proportions. Give these networks a ring and some metal chairs, ’cause I think Summerslam is comin’ early this year.
The shows both put several strangers in a house together and films every moment of their lives over a period of several weeks; their fate is decided by how they engage one another and at the end of every week, one member is voted out of the house. Both shows incorporate live streaming online of the various surveillance cameras mounted around the house; it’s voyeurism at its best. The main difference is that “Glass House” members are voted off by viewers via polls on Facebook and a mobile app; “Big Brother” housemates are voted off by one another. And while there have been several shows spun off to different networks which resemble each other–“American Idol”, “America’s Got Talent”, and “The Voice”, to name a few–the thing that’s really chapping CBS’s hide is that no fewer than 19 former employees of “Big Brother” are now working on “Glass House”.
Even though “Glass House” premiered to not-so-great ratings on Monday, NBC is none too thrilled that ABC is trying to horn in on their reality-based territory and is getting legal, trying to find some sort of copyright protection for reality television. It’s proving difficult, and has hampered their lawsuit. That’s where a cheeky little press release comes in.
Los Angeles, June 21, 2012 – Subsequent to recent developments in the creative and legal community, CBS Television today felt it was appropriate to reveal the upcoming launch of an exciting, ground-breaking and completely original new reality program for the CBS Television Network.
The dazzling new show, DANCING ON THE STARS, will be broadcast live from the Hollywood Forever Cemetery, and will feature moderately famous and sort of well-known people you almost recognize competing for big prizes by dancing on the graves of some of Hollywood’s most iconic and well-beloved stars of stage and screen.
The cemetery, the first in Hollywood, was founded in 1899 and now houses the remains of Andrew “Fatty” Arbuckle, producer Cecil B. DeMille, Douglas Fairbanks, Jr., Paul Muni, Benjamin “Bugsy” Siegel, George Harrison of the Beatles and Dee Dee Ramone of the Ramones, among many other great stars of stage, screen and the music business. The company noted that permission to broadcast from the location is pending, and that if efforts in that regard are unsuccessful, approaches will be made to Westwood Village Memorial Park, where equally scintillating luminaries are interred.
“This very creative enterprise will bring a new sense of energy and fun that’s totally unlike anything anywhere else, honest,” said a CBS spokesperson. “Given the current creative and legal environment in the reality programming business, we’re sure nobody will have any problem with this title or our upcoming half-hour comedy for primetime, POSTMODERN FAMILY. After all, people who live in glass houses shouldn’t throw stones.”
Obviously this is more personal than just the creation of a similar show, or CBS wouldn’t have gone to all the trouble to come up with such a lengthy, well-thought-out smack in the face. At this rate, the battle won’t be over anytime soon.
The Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC), has filed suit in US District Court against the Department of Homeland Security. The grounds for the suit is a refusal by DHS to reply to a Freedom of Information Act request filed by EPIC in April of this year.
According to EPIC’s press release, the center of the issue is a plan by DHS to create fake accounts on social networking sites and use those accounts to monitor the networks for certain key words – such as “drill,” “infection,” “strain,” “virus,” “trojan,” and others. The complaint was filed in the District of Columbia, and asks the court to compel DHS to process EPIC’s FOIA request, as well as to order DHS to produce the records EPIC has requested, to acknowledge EPIC as news media, and to pay EPIC’s legal bills for the suit.
The impetus for EPIC’s request was an announcement by DHS that it planned to implement a Social Media Monitoring and Situation Awareness Initiative, whereby it would monitor social media sites in order to gain realtime information on events. The DHS announcement states that the goal of the initiative is not to collect personally identifiable information except in extreme cases – e.g., a person trapped in rubble with their mobile phone who is posting their status (as happened during the Japanese tsunami).
Though at first glance – and thanks in no small part to EPIC’s description of it – the DHS program sounds awfully “Big Brother.” Upon closer reading of DHS’s actual statement, though, it seems that the goal of the program is to monitor developing situations in realtime, rather than to monitor individuals for subversive behavior.
In my mind, there are only three good reasons to use a passcode lock on your smartphone. The first is obviously security – you don’t want your dumb friends peeking at your private texts. The second is to prevent butt dialing or any other unknown activities that could stem from accidentally unlocking your phone in a traditional way. And lastly, passcodes make it harder to use your phone while drinking, thus reducing your latest Facebook embarrassment.
But if your reason was mainly security, wouldn’t you want to create a 4-digit PIN that wasn’t unbearably easy to guess? Apparently not, according to data posted on app developer Daniel Amitay’s blog today.
One of Amitay’s iOS apps is called “Big Brother Camera Security” Basically, the application will snap a picture of whoever is trying to use your phone without your consent. If they get the code wrong, snap! You have a picture of who was trying to access your device. You can also set it to sound an alarm.
Based on the passcodes of the over 200,000 subscribers to the app, we get some information on the most common passcodes. And unsurprisingly, people fail to secure their phones with any code that would actually secure their phones.
For an app whose sole purpose is security, the top password is 1234. The second most common passcode was 0000. And the bronze goes to 2580, which as you probably know is simply a straight line down the middle of the keypad.
Here’s a graph of the top 10 most common passcodes. It looks as though 1,425 people thought that 5683, which spells “Love,” was a good choice.
Apparently, people also love to use years as their passcodes. Whether they coincide with dates of birth, graduations, or anniversaries, 1990-2000 were in the top 50 most used passcodes and 1980-1989 were all in the top 100. One is the most common digit for the first spot in the code, while zero is the most common in the last spot.
So, guys, you’ve gotta step up your password game. I know you don’t want to make them so complicated that you forget them yourselves, but there is a happy medium between digits with no significance and 1111. And with these statistics in hand it is very likely that I could break into your phone with minimal effort.
Formulaic passwords are never a good idea, yet 15% of all passcode sets were represented by only 10 different passcodes (out of a possible 10,000). The implication? A thief (or just a prankster) could safely try 10 different passcodes on your iPhone without initiating the data wipe. With a 15% success rate, about 1 in 7 iPhones would easily unlock–even more if the intruder knows the users’ years of birth, relationship status, etc.
So next time you want to check out your boyfriend/girlfriend’s texts from last night, try a couple of these simple combinations. There’s a really good chance that one of them will work.