WebProNews

Tag: ad targeting

  • Is Facebook Secretly Listening to You to Target Ads?

    Is Facebook Secretly Listening to You to Target Ads?

    Facebook knows you pretty well. In fact, I’d be willing to bet that Facebook knows more about what you like and how much you like it than many of your friends. Think about it. You’ve been dropping Facebook subtle and not-so-subtle hints for years. You casually “like” Netflix, The Big Lebowski, and AMC Theaters over the years? Facebook knows you like movies. You post every day about diapers, bottles, and naps? Facebook probably knows you have a baby.

    At this point, Facebook is really good at serving you ads based on pages you like, statuses you post, and even outside websites you visit. Scary good. If you’re unsure about this, then head on over to Amazon. Search for something you want. Check out the product page. Maybe even add it to your cart – but don’t buy it. Now, head back to Facebook. You see the ad, right?

    Facebook is a company that lives and dies by how much confidence it can instill in the minds of advertisers – confidence that their ads are being targeted to the right people at the right time. Because of this, Facebook is always looking for a better way to serve you ads. When Facebook sees that you just liked Outback Steakhouse, that’s a signal equivalent to you saying “I want to eat Outback Steakhouse.” When you like Groupon on Facebook, it’s your way of telling Facebook “I like hearing about daily deals.”

    Do you think it’s possible that Facebook could be listening to your conversations to target ads? Let us know in the comments.

    It’s a powerful marketing tool, for sure. Through a series of clicks, Facebook can take a guess at what you like, want, and need. It’s likely pretty accurate, for the most part.

    What’s more accurate, however, is literally hearing someone say it.

    – – – – – – – – – –

    Here’s an interesting theory, posed by a redditor:

    “I have a crazy conspiracy theory and I’m pretty sure I proved myself correct … while you’re scrolling through photos, Instagram listens in to what you say through your iPhone’s microphone to drive targeted advertising through Facebook,” says user popular_rhino in a discussion post on reddit’s r/technology subreddit.

    Here’s their story:

    I found this out after I saw an ad on Facebook for a club that I had been talking about two hours prior, out loud, to friends in my living room. I thought “well that’s a coincidence, what if my phone is listening to me speak.” I then remembered that less than 24 hours prior, I had granted Instagram access to my microphone, something I usually have disabled through privacy settings.

    I also remembered that I was using Instagram when I had mentioned the club. I went back into my phones privacy settings and immediately disabled Instagram’s access to the mic.

    So I drew up a test to test my theory- Does Instagram actually listen to my conversation just while scrolling through photos?

    I would turn on the mic, mentioning a list of random words that I had wrote down…. Bulldozer, cucumbers, the louvre, Maserati, hiking in the Yukon, African Safari vacation, and a few other random words/terms that had nothing to do with my Facebook interests.

    Sure enough, two hours later I was getting ads for Gold Coast Maserati, and African Vacations, also ads for art museums, and climbing.

    I did a quick search on Google and reddit to see if anyone else had come to the same conclusion but was unable to come up with anything. Has anyone else experienced this? is it widely known? Do you think I’m nuts?

    Nuts? Hardly. Other users quickly chimed in with their own, similar experiences.

    From u/SweetPrism:

    I’m almost positive this is true. I saw an ad on facebook for Victorian corsets. I mentioned in passing to my friend that I’d like a corset, but not a black and red Hot Topic one, a straight-up old school one. I wasn’t on Instagram, I have not done ANY searching online for them, and there are NONE pinned on my Pinterest, even. And I didn’t even turn on the mic on my phone. There was no other explanation than the fact that they have the ability to turn the mic on for you. This scares the ever-loving shit out of me, and it wasn’t the first time it’d happened, either. It was just one of the examples that stuck in my mind because there was literally no record of me expressing an interest in that item except verbally speaking to a friend

    From u/INVALID_STRING_NAME:

    So I have been testing this throughout the day using three different phones. I have concluded that Facebook and Instagram are utilizing location tracking and microphone access to provide targeted ads. Each phone I spoke about different things in different rooms, with and without the settings enabled.

    Each phone I scrolled through 10 pages. I ensured no background noise interfered and my wife made sure she didn’t talk about anything when the settings were enabled.

    Phone 1 – I spoke about House of Cards, Australia, Outback Steakhouse and baby toys.

    Phone 2 – I spoke about Biking, Hunting, Laptops and video games.

    Phone 3 – I spoke about printers, CCNA tests, Harry potter and getting a new bed.

    Sure enough a few hours later I would see ads relating to all of these things. We saw an increase in ads relating to Netflix, Cisco routers… Everything. My wife, my brother and I all removed the applications from our phones permanently. This is the scariest thing ever. This can’t legal. When we gave these apps access to those things I was under the impression it was being used for videos we’d record and post to Facebook and to Instagram.. Not to target ads to us.

    We have been doing our taxes and we spoke about social security numbers and all that stuff. Who knows what the person listening on the other side if there are any is doing with that information.

    From u/hummusdingus:

    It’s not (just) Instagram, it’s the Facebook app itself. The Twitter app has started too. I noticed this weird phenomenon about 2 years ago. I thought at first that since Facebook’s business model is to be the best-tailored ad machine to you, that it was working as expected, and that it was mere coincidence. But then the coincidences kept happening. The coincidences kept happening after verbal conversations too.

    I was talking with a friend about basketball, and then I started getting ads about the NCAA tournament.

    I talked to another friend about whether I could ever afford to buy a house, and then 30 minutes later, I started to get ads about home mortgages.

    My girlfriend and I were talking about engagement, and then we BOTH started to get ads about engagement rings.

    My girlfriend was talking to me about candy. Then we BOTH got the same Twitter sponsored post for Skittles.

    I was watching a financial documentary, and then got ads on the Twitter app about financial services. This one was particularly interesting – it’s normal to get widespread sponsored posts that have tens of thousands of retweets and favorites. This sponsored ad was from an unheard-of financial services company, that had 10 followers, and the post had 1 favorite.

    Again, it really could only have gotten these ad hints from audible conversation, not from the content of my posts or chats. It was very very interesting to me. I’ve deleted both the Facebook and Twitter apps (as well as my Facebook account) and it hasn’t happened again.

    Long story short, these people are claiming that Instagram, a Facebook-owned company, and likely Facebook itself, are listening in on their conversations and serving them real-time ads based on said conversations.

    – – – – – – – – – –

    Bottom line: Is this possible?

    Well, Facebook and/or Instagram would have to have access to your microphone. Both do, of course, if you’ve given them permission.

    Instagram has been asking users for microphone access for a little under a year – right around the time the company unveiled Instagram video. “Why is Instagram asking for permission to use my phone’s microphone?” asks a question on Instagram’s help page. Answer: “This permission allows Instagram to use your phone’s microphone to capture sound when recording a video.”

    Facebook – as well as Facebook Messenger – can also request access to your phone or tablet’s microphone. You may recall that Facebook found itself in a bit of hot water last summer over a new feature dubbed passive listening. In May of 2014, Facebook announced a new opt-in feature that allows the social network to listen to a user’s activity and use what it hears to help identify songs, TV shows, and movies for the purpose of crafting status updates. Basically, you give Facebook access to your microphone, it hears you watching Inglorious Basterds in the background, and automatically crafts a I’m watching Inglorious Basterds status update for you.

    This didn’t go over very well.

    Within hours, a petition demanding Facebook abandon plans for this new feature emerged. It quickly amassed hundreds of thousands of signatures.

    “Facebook says the feature will be used for harmless things, like identifying the song or TV show playing in the background, but it actually has the ability to listen to everything — including your private conservations — and store it indefinitely,” read the petition. “Not only is this move just downright creepy, it’s also a massive threat to our privacy. This isn’t the first time Facebook has been criticized for breaching our right to privacy, and it’s hoping this feature will fly under the radar.”

    Facebook responded, saying it was not always listening.

    “The microphone doesn’t turn itself on, it will ask for permission. It’s not always listening…so it’s very limited in what it is sampling,” Facebook Security Infrastructure head Gregg Stefancik said. “I wouldn’t want this in my pocket either if it was recording everything going on around me.”

    Facebook elaborated in a “debunking myths” post:

    Myth: The feature listens to and stores your conversations.

    Fact: Nope, no matter how interesting your conversation, this feature does not store sound or recordings. Facebook isn’t listening to or storing your conversations.

    Here’s how it works: if you choose to turn the feature on, when you write a status update, the app converts any sound into an audio fingerprint on your phone. This fingerprint is sent to our servers to try and match it against our database of audio and TV fingerprints. By design, we do not store fingerprints from your device for any amount of time. And in any event, the fingerprints can’t be reversed into the original audio because they don’t contain enough information.

    Myth: Facebook is always listening using your microphone.

    Fact: Nope, if you choose to turn this feature on, it will only use your microphone (for 15 seconds) when you’re actually writing a status update to try and match music and TV.

    Facebook clearly has the ability to listen via its own flagship and auxiliary apps, as well as through Instagram – but does it? And if it does, what’s it doing with all that data?

    – – – – – – – – – –

    After coming across the aforementioned reddit thread, I became curious. Not that it was a shock to me that Facebook could possibly do something like this – the “listening to your conversations” accusation has been thrown around for quite some time. But the specificity of which these Facebook users described their tests of concept, well, it intrigued me.

    So I opened up Facebook on my desktop. I had one sidebar ad – for Blue Apron, a meal delivery service. I don’t like Blue Apron on Facebook, and I don’t follow them on Instagram. I’ve never searched for Blue Apron and I most certainly have never visited the company’s website. I do post a lot of food photos, however.

    Then I remembered something – a brief conversation a friend and I had had on Sunday night about Blue Apron. She’d let me try a chicken pot pie that she’d cooked based on a Blue Apron recipe. We both mentioned the name “Blue Apron” a couple of times, and went about our Oscars-watching.

    Now, I had a Facebook ad for it.

    Naturally, I told my friend and co-worker Chris Crum about this. We mentioned Blue Apron several times.

    Twenty minutes later, Chris had a Facebook ad for Blue Apron. Like me, Chris doesn’t like Blue Apron on Facebook, and he doesn’t follow them on Instagram. He’s never searched for Blue Apron and most certainly has never visited the company’s website. Unlike me, Chris rarely posts about food or cooking.

    Thinking this was creepy and hilarious, we began to pay closer attention to the ads Facebook was serving us.

    Soon, Chris saw a Sprint ad featuring AAA. According to him, he’d been discussing renewing his AAA membership that morning on the way to work.

    Then, Chris saw an ad for Cottonelle. Moments later, an ad for Huggies. Chris had explicitly discussed with his wife the need to pick up toilet paper and diapers during his morning commute. To be fair, Facebook probably knows that Chris has a baby at home.

    We noticed an ad for JINX.com, a clothing company. We remembered we’d recently discussed the new HBO series The Jinx: The Life and Deaths of Robert Durst.

    We noticed an ad for a game called Real Sniper about an hour after discussing the film American Sniper.

    In a weekend act of stupidity, I recently shattered my phone. All morning I’d been talking about needing a new phone. Soon we were both hit with multiple Sprint ads, as well as “special offers for AT&T”.

    At this point, we both decided to have some fun with this. We made sure that Instagram and Facebook were both running on our phones (in the background), and started talking (loudly) about things like travel, wanting to travel, art, art museums, our love of deals, daily deals, amazon, and the need for a new car.

    Within the next hour, we both saw multiple automobile ads (Lexus, Mini), as well as multiple travel-related ads (Viator, Norway cruises). Chris saw an ad for Lactaid that was framed in the most bizarre manner. The ad featured several mentions of “travel”, with the only logic behind it being that people who travel like to drink hot chocolate and when you drink hot chocolate you should put Lactaid in it.

    A half-hour after our loud conversation, I saw an ad for Art.com.

    For the next few hours, we both saw suggested posts for Amazon deals.

    – – – – – – – – – –

    So we slept on it. The Blue Apron thing, the AAA thing, and the toilet paper thing were weird, for sure – but many of those other ad subjects were rather generic. Cars, Amazon deal, vacations. These are the types of ads that many see, although they were timed rather perfectly with our conversations.

    But how often do 30-year-old men see ads for sanitary pads?

    About an hour after getting to the office, Chris saw an ad for overnight leakage protection pads – for children. He mentioned to me that he and his wife had been having a conversation about periods in the car that morning.

    Not quite perfect targeting, I said. But kind of close. We mentioned the term “pads” multiple times.

    Less than an hour later, Chris had an ad from Poise touting its leakage pads. The ad featured the hashtag #recycleyourperiodpad. Chris is a man. Facebook knows this, for sure. Yet he was now receiving ads for feminine hygiene products.

    – – – – – – – – – –

    Coincidence? Quite possibly. Frequency Illusion? Maybe. Everything here is purely anecdotal.

    But one’s an incident, two’s a coincidence, and three’s a pattern, right?

    This isn’t the first time people have noticed that Facebook has a weird ability to know exactly what you were just talking about. People were complaining about this over a year ago – in Facebook’s own community help center.

    Here’s a story from one user in response to the question “why does the mobile app need access to my microphone or camera w/o my consent?”

    “I found this page after I noticed a strange ‘suggested page’. It was for a douche bag that was on a TV show that was playing at a friend’s house last night. I’ve never given any indication that I would ever watch this show from any of my posts or other likes on Facebook. The only thing I could think of, was that Facebook picked up the audio from my phone. That’s what got me looking at the app’s permissions in the first place. While I know that Facebook is the customer here, and if you truly want to have privacy, you shouldn’t have a social account of any kind, I still feel violated by the idea that the Facebook app could be listening in.”

    “Something very similar happened to me today,” said another user. “I was talking about belgian waffles with my mother this morning and I know I had my phone next to me. Never googled it or typed it anywhere on my phone or laptop. But then a little while ago I noticed that there was a ‘suggested post’ about belgian waffles. REALLY creepy.”

    Facebook is a company that already targets ads, algorithmically, based on keywords. Facebook employs real-time ad targeting. Facebook has access to voice recognition software. We’re talking about a company with an entire business model devoted to pleasing advertisers through better targeting and better results. It’s constantly making improvements – tweaking its ad offerings to squeeze every little bit it can.

    And it just hit 2 million active advertisers.

    Once again, this is all anecdotal at this point and a reasonable person could explain it away as coincidence or some admittedly hilarious cognitive bias. But if Facebook were listening to your conversations, via Instagram or any of its other apps, would it really surprise you?

    “If someone describes an idea as a ‘crazy conspiracy theory,’ it probably is. This has no basis in fact,” a Facebook spokesperson told WebProNews.

    Have you experienced anything like this? Let us know in the comments.

  • Twitter Adds Mobile Targeting Options

    Twitter Adds Mobile Targeting Options

    Twitter announced the launch of two new mobile targeting features for advertisers: mobile carrier targeting and targeting users with new mobile devices.

    Twitter says a number of types of advertisers can make use of carrier targeting, such as carriers themselves, mobile manufacturers, app marketers, and other verticals.

    “Advertisers across verticals can create carrier-targeted campaigns that align with their preferred demographic,” Twitter says in a blog post. “For example, a CPG brand that knows that users of a certain carrier are more likely to be interested in their product can target those users exclusively to optimize campaign efficiency.”

    “Using new mobile device targeting, you can target (or exclude) people who have recently used Twitter on a new mobile device or carrier,” it says. “This feature is ideal for mobile app marketers who want to reach those who are looking for apps to install on their new device. You can target those who have used Twitter on a new device within a certain period of time. And, you can combine new mobile device targeting with any other targeting type, such as keyword, interest or mobile operating system.”

    Over 80 percent of Twitter’s active users use the service from mobile devices.

    The company recently launched tailored audiences based on mobile apps users have on their devices.

    Image via Twitter

  • Bing Ads Get Targeting Changes, App Extensions

    Microsoft rolled out tablet-related device targeting changes for Bing Ads last month, putting PC and tablet targeting together across campaigns. Now, device targeting is changing some more.

    Bing is eliminating explicit mobile device targeting.

    Microsoft’s Gyan Trivedi explains, “Advertisers will be able to leverage bid modifiers on Mobile. We will continue having the bid modifier on Tablet as well. Once this change is rolled out, there should be complete compatibility between how ad campaigns are managed in Google AdWords and in Bing Ads.”

    Right now, Bing ads offer a Desktop and Tablet targeting option and a smartphone targeting option. With the changes, it will have one for Desktop, tablet, and smartphones, and one for smartphones.

    The changes should be completed in March.

    The company also introduced new app extensions for its ads, which will let users install advertisers’ mobile apps.

    “App extensions will enable you to promote your app for download on Android, iOS or Windows Phone devices,” says Trivedi. “These extensions will automatically be targeted to a specific user’s OS and device combination. Searchers will be able to discover, download and experience your offerings directly through your mobile app, thus deepening your engagement with them.”

    These are also coming in March.

    Image via Bing

  • Google In-App Ads Let You Target Those Who Have Made In-App Purchases Before

    Google announced a new targeting capability for its in-app display ads, enabling advertisers to target users who have actually made in-app purchases in the past. If they’ve done it before, it stands to reason that they’d do it again, so this could help the results of these ads tremendously.

    Specifically, it looks at in-app purchases from the Google Play Store, and the feature is an addition to the Google Display Network. It also enables advertisers to reach people who have purchases paid apps.

    “These new settings can help you identify and create a campaign strategy around your most valuable customers,” Google says in a Google+ update. “You can use this new offering in individual ad groups by using the checkbox labeled ‘Only show ads to people who purchased an app or made an in-app purchase.’ You’ll find this under Interests & Remarketing when adding new targeting categories to your campaign.”

    “It’s best to use this option in ad groups specifically designed to reach your highest value customers,” Google adds. “While narrowed targeting can help focus your bidding strategy, it can also limit ad impressions. While the volume of customers gained may be lower than you see in other campaigns, you may find the lifetime value (LTV) of these customers to be higher.”

    The new targeting option is available via the AdWords API.

    Image via Google+

  • Twitter Adds Tools To Tailored Audiences

    Twitter Adds Tools To Tailored Audiences

    Twitter announced an update to its Tailored Audiences ad targeting feature. It’s getting new stuff like audience list uploading, better audience management tools, new supported ID types, and better targeting in general.

    Twitter first made Tailored Audiences available globally in December. Now it has look-alike-only targeting, which lets you only target users similar to your tailored audience.

    As Twitter explains, “This lets you reach users who are most like your best existing customers, and is particularly useful for mobile app promotion campaigns to reach users similar to those who have already installed your app. To enable you to drive more efficient user acquisition, we’ve added the ability to exclude tailored audiences based on website visitors from campaigns using interest, keyword, TV and other tailored audiences.”

    The new Audience Manager tool shows you details on all audiences in one place, and lets you change or delete them.

    “To augment the total reach of tailored audiences you can create using your customer info, you can now build audiences using mobile phone numbers in addition to email addresses,’ says product manager Kelton Lynn. “We also support Apple iOS and Google Android mobile advertising IDs so you can create audiences of users with your apps installed or who take certain actions like viewing a product or achieving a level in your apps. We have extended this functionality to our Ads API so you can have the same functionality if you prefer to work directly with any of our Ads API partners.”

    Twitter also reminds us that users have privacy options related to this stuff. You can always uncheck the box in your privacy settings next to “Tailor ads based on information shared by ads partners”.

    Image via Twitter

  • Bing Ads Get Better Location Targeting, Ad Scheduling

    Microsoft announced some updates to Bing Ads aimed at improving location targeting and ad scheduling. Now included are: ad scheduling in fifteen-minute increments, zip code targeting and exclusion, radius targeting improvements, a new geo location report, user experience improvements for location targeting, intent only targeting, and better city level targeting.

    “In addition to these user-facing updates, there are also several improvements in the Bing Ads platform to improve location targeting,” explains program manager Piyush Naik. “Most notably, we have made significant improvements in accurately detecting searcher’s location through various location signals. This will you help reach your target audience with greater precision.”

    “These updates to our targeting feature set are not designed in isolation, but rather in a comprehensive and all-inclusive manner after listening to which improvements matter most to you. We certainly hope these updates will help you to be more productive in Bing Ads and in achieving your business goals,” Naik adds.

    The company discusses each of the features in more detail here.

    Image via Bing

  • Facebook Lets Advertisers Target Based On Network Connection

    Facebook announced that it is giving advertisers a new feature that allows them to target people based on the network connection they most often use when accessing Facebook. Options are: 2G, 3G, or 4G.

    The idea is that this will help businesses better reach users in developing countries with more varied connections, so simpler ads can be targeted to lesser connections, making for an all around less annoying experience.

    “Facebook already offers the option to reach people based on the type of device they use (smart phones, feature phones and tablets), as well as device model and operating system,” the company said in a blog post. “However, advertisers also told us that having the ability to segment based on network connection type would help them create better ad experiences.”

    “Targeting by mobile network type helps advertisers choose creative that will run smoothly on any given device and connection speed,” it added. “For example, serving a video ad to people in Indonesia with 2G connections may mean wasted impressions if people are unable to load the video or it buffers for minutes when clicked. Optimizing the creative — for instance, targeting a video campaign to people with high-speed connections, and swapping in an image or link ad for people with slower connections — means ads can perform more efficiently for the people seeing them.”

    The company also suggests that advertisers will be able to create more compelling localized campaigns using the feature. Vodafone has already been doing this with good early results, it says.

    Bandwidth targeting is immediately available to advertisers around the world with the Ad Create Tool, Power Editor, and the API.

    Facebook revealed in its most recent earnings report that it had 654 million mobile daily active users on average during the second quarter, up 39% from the same period last year. It had 1.07 billion mobile monthly active users.

    Image via Facebook

  • Bing Ads Report Suite Gets New Geo Location Report

    The Bing Ads Report suite and API now features a new geographical location report. This had apparently been an highly requested feature.

    “In response to your feedback, we’ve redesigned how location information is displayed in the report to show you exactly which targeting method was used to serve your ad,” says Microsoft’s Fady Khoury in a blog post. “We’ve also gone under the hood to enable this report to incorporate new targeting features when they become available.”

    The new version can be found under Targeting. The old version is still there, but is now labeled “old version”.

    The old one didn’t clarify between physical location or search location when it came to what was being being served with ads. Now, there’s a column called “Location Type,” which identifies location type by “physical location” or “location of interest”.

    Another new column called “Most Specific Location” lets you see the most specific location that was used for targeting.

    Khoury offers this scenario to illustrate the helpfulness of the changes:

    Let’s say you sell your products only in Seattle, and you’re using the default targeting option for your campaign (“Show ads to people in, searching for, or viewing pages about your targeted location”). You open the new Geo Location report, and you see that 100 ad clicks have a “Physical location” location type and 80 ad clicks have a “Location of interest” location type.

    Based on this data, you conclude that a significant amount of people are searching for your business outside of Seattle, and decide to expand your targeting to more areas like Portland to reach out to potentially more interested people.

    The new stuff is apparently already available for all advertisers.

    Image via Microsoft

  • Twitter Expands Geo-Targeting To More Countries, Adds Postal Code Targeting In U.S.

    Twitter announced the expansion of geo-targeting features to more advertisers. It has added state and region targeting in Brazil and Canada and postal code targeting in the U.S.

    It is also adding geo-targeting including state and region targeting to eight new countries including: Australia, France, Indonesia, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Netherlands, and the UK. Twitter now offers granular geo-targeting in twelve countries and country-level targeting in over 200.

    “Advertisers across the world have been using geo-targeting to precisely target the most relevant audience for tangible results,” says Twitter product manager Nipoon Malhotra, who shares several examples in a blog post.

    “We’re excited about how expanded geo-targeting options will enable global Twitter advertisers to better reach their target audiences,” Malhotra says.

    Last Friday, Twitter launched a new ad unit called the Website Card to drive traffic to websites. That came after its MoPub network opened up native ads to all advertisers.

    Twitter released its quarterly earnings report earlier this week, with revenue up 119%, though its stock hit an all-time low with investors unimpressed by Twitter’s growth. Monthly active users were up 25%.

    Image via Twitter

  • Reddit Frontpage Ads Get Location Targeting

    Reddit Frontpage Ads Get Location Targeting

    Reddit announced on Wednesday that it has released location targeting on its frontpage, to make ads more personally relevant to users (which is obviously more helpful to advertisers as well).

    As the company says, this will be especially helpful for things like movie premieres, which often have different release dates in different countries, as well as products that can only ship to certain places, or events for specific cities. These are just examples.

    The company has offered country and city targeting on image ads for a while.

    Reddit’s Jena Donlin writes on the company blog, “Ad dollars on reddit are money well spent. Not only are you supporting your goals and reddit, you’re also giving back to the reddit community. 10% of all ad revenue (not profit, revenue) in 2014 will be given to non-profits chosen by redditors.”

    Reddit is giving away free ads to crowdfunded projects, small local businesses, nonprofits, and those looking to hire redditors. It’s also offering 200 small ad campaigns to international businesses who set up some of the first campaigns targeting based on country viewing from.

    “We have a longstanding tradition to give out free promoted posts on reddit to different categories of advertisers as the whim takes us,” says Donlin.

    Those who wish to get in on the free international campaigns are told to use their reddit accounts, and go to reddit.com/advertising, then click “Create an Ad.” Then follow the steps listed here.

    Image via reddit

  • Facebook Says It Doesn’t Use ‘Nearby Friends’ Feature For Ad Targeting ‘Right Now’

    On Thursday, Facebook announced the launch of a new “Nearby Friends” feature, which enables people to see when they’re friends are close to their own location. How close? A spokesperson for the company tells WebProNews that the feature recognizes when friends are within a half mile radius of one another.

    Businesses may be wondering if they can tap into this feature, and target these friends with ads. They can’t. At least not yet.

    AdAge shares a quote from the company, which says: “The answer is no, we are not using data from Nearby Friends or Location History to target ads right now. Currently, advertisers can target ads based on location. To determine location, we use things like people’s current city that they list on their profiles, and their IP address. We do not currently target ads to people based on GPS coordinates.” Emphasis added.

    It sounds like Facebook is using its wording to leave the feature open to the possibility of ad targeting in the future. We’ll have to wait and see.

    The feature does enable users to share specific locations with their friends, so if they are indeed nearby, they can meet up somewhere. It shows their friends on the selected meeting destination on a map. One could imagine where a business could want to be that place where they meet up.

    Businesses do have the luxury of appearing in another mobile Facebook feature, Nearby Places, but the new feature caters to users who are specifically looking to go somewhere, and it’s really about who they’re meeting, so the meeting place could often be undecided initially. That could be a good opportunity for businesses to swoop in should Facebook ever decide to add targeting capabilities.

    It might not be great for an insurance agency, but it could be helpful for a movie theater, a bar/restaurant, or a store.

    Image via Facebook

  • Facebook Adds New Capabilities To Lookalike Audiences

    Facebook announced some new targeting capabilities for its Lookalike Audiences option.

    Facebook launched Lookalike Audiences about a year ago aimed at helping marketers target audience segments with similar common attributes (interest, demographics) to the customers they already identified as a target audience through the Custom Audiences feature.

    Now, Facebook is letting advertisers create “lookalikes” based on people who visit their website, use their mobile apps, or connect to their Facebook Pages.

    “Say you’re an online florist that wants to reach people similar to those that made purchases on your website,” Facebook says in a blog post. “Now you can use data from your Facebook pixels (Facebook Conversion Pixel or the Custom Audiences for Websites pixel) to reach people who are most similar to people who previously made purchases on your website. E-commerce company Shopify saw a 2X decrease in cost per lead when using lookalikes of their website visitors.”

    “Perhaps you’re an app developer that’s looking to find more people to purchase car rides in your rides on demand app,” the company adds. “You can now create lookalike audiences based on people that have previously purchased taxi rides in your app and reach those audiences with mobile app ads. For many businesses, engaging customers and prospects in ongoing conversation through their Page is an important part of their marketing strategy. These advertisers can now use lookalike audiences to reach people like the fans connected to their Facebook Page.”

    Naturally, the company makes a point to note that the features are “designed to protect people’s privacy”. They give marketers access to groups of people without sharing which specific people are in those groups.

    The new features are available to all advertisers around the world in Power Editor starting today. Go to Audiences > Create New Audience > Lookalike Audience.

    Image via Facebook

  • Facebook Ads Get Even More Targeting Options

    Facebook announced that it is about to begin rolling out improved “Core Audiences” targeting options, which are built into all of its ad buying interfaces. These will allow advertisers to target “precise audiences” based on location, demographic, interests and behaviors.

    “Say you’re a retailer that wants to show ads to people that live near your brick-and-mortar locations,” Facebook explains in a blog post. “With flexible location targeting, you can build campaigns around any combination of geographies: country and city (France and London), country and state (Canada and New York), state and city (California and Las Vegas), state and ZIP code (US only), etc. It’s also easier to exclude certain areas — i.e., New York City, except 11211, or the UK, excluding Cambridge.”

    Remember those stories from earlier this week about Facebook knowing when you’re about to start a relationship, and when you fall in love?

    Facebook is also encouraging advertisers to target people who have recently declared their love on the social network. Core Audiences now features additional values for relationship status, such as civil unions and domestic partnerships, and timely changes in life events, such as getting engaged or married. It will also now let you target people that have gotten engaged or married in the past year or the last three or six months.

    Core Audiences also now includes workplace and job title information, as well as expanded education information.

    “We know that people have a ton of interests, and that marketers want to reach people specifically based on them,” Facebook says. “So we simplified how you can do this on Facebook by redefining our interest-based targeting segments so each has one simple meaning. Rather than having multiple targeting options like broad categories and keywords, we developed a new methodology that increases the precision of interest-based targeting by allowing advertisers to simply choose one segment. Now, if you want to reach baseball fans, just choose “baseball” as your targeting segment — it’ll pull in all the people that have liked or expressed interest in baseball-related topics on Facebook.”

    Finally, Core Audiences is getting a new targeting option in behaviors, which includes Partner Categories. This enables marketers to target users based on things they purchase and the devices they use.

    Additionally, in the U.S., Facebook is adding Partner Categories to the Ads Create Tool. These were previously only available in the Power Editor.

    Image via Facebook

  • Twitter Makes ‘Tailored Audiences’ Retargeting Available Globally

    Twitter began testing its “tailored audiences” ad retargeting back in the summer and has now announced the feature’s global availability.

    “With tailored audiences you can reach users on Twitter who have shown interest in your brand or your category even away from Twitter,” explains Twitter revenue product manager Abhishek Shrivastava. “Let’s say a hotel brand wants to advertise a promotion on Twitter and they’d prefer to show their ad to travel enthusiasts who have recently visited their website. To get the special offer to those people who are also on Twitter, the hotel brand may share with us browser-related information (browser cookie ID) through an ads partner. We can then match that information to Twitter accounts in order to show the matched users a Promoted Tweet with the travel deal. The end result is a highly relevant and useful message for the user.”

    Tailored Audiences

    “Targeting recent visitors to your website is just one way to use tailored audiences,” says Shrivastava. “We believe there are many other possibilities. Think of it as the way to define your own groups of existing and target customers, and connect with them on Twitter.”

    Advertisers will still get the same reports as usual, showing how many saw and clicked on an ad.

    If you’re concerned about privacy, you can uncheck the box next to “promoted content” in your privacy settings, and Twitter won’t match your account to info shared by partners for tailoring ads. If you have Do Not Track enabled, Twitter won’t use cookies.

    The company says results from early testing have been impressive. Brands include HubSpot, Krossover, New Relic, and Delta Air Lines and agency partner Digitas. Ads partners who have participated include Adara, AdRoll, BlueKai, Chango, DataXu, Dstillery, Lotame, Quantcast, ValueClick, and [x+1].

    Advertisers are being told to contact their account team for more info about getting started.

  • Twitter Ads Get Better, Expand To More Businesses

    Now that it’s a public company, Twitter will eternally have a lot of questions to answer regarding revenue. The company’s monetization efforts have been criticized heavily for years, and are obviously now in a greater spotlight than ever.

    Twitter just made a couple of major announcements in the advertising department. It is launching enhanced mobile targeting, and making its ads available to small and medium-sized businesses in the UK, Ireland and Canada.

    76% of Twitter’s 230 million users access the service with a mobile device, according to the company. In the past, advertisers have been able to target users by operating system, but now, they can segment audiences on iOS and Android by OS version, specific device, and WiFi connectivity.

    To go along with the new targeting enhancements, Twitter has also launched new reporting analytics for them.

    “This increased granularity in mobile targeting helps advertisers reach users who are most important to them,” says Twitter Ads product manager Kelton Lynn. “For example: Mobile app marketers can now reach users who have compatible OS versions, ideal device types for app usage with high connectivity to prompt a new download or re-engagement through an app card. Telco marketers can now promote loyalty and rewards to users on their specific devices, or reach new prospects on older devices. All marketers can focus their campaigns on users with device models that are indicative of demographics which align with their campaign goals.”

    null

    As of Thursday, Twitter’s self-serve ad platform is open to SMBs in the UK, Ireland and Canada. Availability launched to U.S. SMBs in April, and Twitter says thousands of businesses have taken advantage.

    “Twitter advertising lets you amplify your presence on the platform, while giving you total control of your message,” Twitter Revenue product manager Ravi Narasimhan tells businesses. “Use Promoted Accounts to build an active community of followers who are advocates and influencers for your business. If you’re looking to broaden the reach of message, try Promoted Tweets, which let you engage with users who are not yet following you based on a variety of powerful targeting options.”

    “It takes a just few minutes to get started with Twitter Ads,” Narasimhan adds. “If you can Tweet, you can advertise on Twitter — all you need is a Twitter account and a credit card. You’re in control of your ads, the audience you want to reach, and of course your budget. Best of all, you will only be charged when people follow your Promoted Account or retweet, reply, favorite or click on your Promoted Tweets. You are never charged for your organic Twitter activity.”

    A lot of small businesses remain skeptical about Twitter’s ability to have a significant impact. NorthJersey.com reports that small businesses in the area are mixed on Twitter ads.

    One business owner is quoted as saying, “We track how many people have been looking us up on social media and our website, and I know it’s been increasing – but I still don’t know if I would pay for advertising. Interest can be gained through Twitter, but at this stage I don’t think we would look into advertising on there. Maybe we would wait until it is successful with other local small businesses.”

    Additional targeting abilities like those just launched should help, but it’s really just a start. Look at how long Google has been in the game, and it still manages to launch highly significant new efforts in ad targeting and reporting (no doubt one of the reasons Google is now bigger than all of magazines or all of newspapers in the U.S. in terms of ad revenue).”

    Simon Mansell, CEO of Twitter Ads API partner TBG Digital thinks “haters are wrong about Twitter,” and that the ad products are promising.

    “We have talked to our clients and everyone agrees that it’s a relatively new channel and there is still work to do,” he says. “However, it does allow brands to communicate around things that are happening in real time, to feel and act more like humans and hopefully as a result create real emotional relationships with their target audience.”

    Mansell adds, “Is everyone clear on how to measure Twitter activity yet? No. Does that mean brands shouldn’t try it? No. One of the main objectives of advertising is to cut through the clutter, so if brands always waited for new platforms to have completely developed ad products with targeting and measurement all nailed down perfectly, the opportunity to cut-through and stand-out may have passed.”

    The new targeting capabilities can be accessed via the mobile targeting filters in Twitter’s ad campaign setup, and they’ll be available through its Ads API partners in the near future.

  • Facebook Launches ‘Partner Categories’ Ad Targeting

    Facebook announced the launch of a new self-serve targeting ad targeting feature for partner categories. The categories use data from select third parties like Acxiom, Datalogix and Epsilon.

    “For example, a local car dealership can now show ads to people who are likely in the market for a new car who live near their dealership,” the company explains. “To date, advertisers have been able to show ads to people based on their expressed interests on Facebook. Now with partner categories, they can also show ads to people on Facebook based on the products and brands they buy across both desktop and mobile.”

    “Companies have long used this type of targeting off of Facebook, and we are excited to make this available to advertisers of all sizes on Facebook,” the company adds.

    The categories work the same way all targeting on Facebook works. To kick things off, partner categories includes over 500 unique groups and works with other Facebook targeting options.

    The feature will be available to US advertisers in Power Editor and through the API starting today.

    Facebook assures users that no personal information is shared between Facebook and third parties or advertisers.

  • Twitter Unveils New Interest, Device, and Gender Targeting for Self-Service Advertisers

    Twitter has just announced some big improvements to its invitation-only self-service ad platform that make it easier for businesses to target the right kinds of users with their paid ads.

    Now, when deciding who to promote their accounts and tweets to, businesses who use Twitter’s self-service ads have a few new options to narrow it down. First, advertisers can select to target users who follow specific accounts that are similar to the field in which the advertiser is advertising.

    For example, if a craft brewery wanted to target their promoted tweets toward people with an interest in beer, they could target users with the same interests as those who follow accounts like @DrinkCraftBeer, @BeerAdvocate, or specific craft breweries like Dogfish Head or Southern Tier.

    Advertisers can also choose to target users inside 350 different “interest categories” – beer, golf, birdwatching, and so on.

    Additionally, new targeting options include users’ devices and operating systems. This is a particularly useful options, as an Android game developers could target their tweets to Android users, or the makers of an iOS app could target just iOS users.

    Twitter has also added gender targeting for self-service advertisers.

    According to Twitter, these were some of the the most demanded features from those advertisers inside the self-service ad network.

    Twitter has also opened up its advanced interface to all U.S. advertisers.

    “Self-service advertisers who are more experienced with online advertising can now choose to use our advanced interface’s deeper campaign controls, detailed reporting and analytics, and multi-campaign optimization, which help them run more complex campaigns and optimize in real time. The pricing remains the same, and you can start and stop campaigns at any time in both interfaces,” says Twitter.

    If you’re an advertiser that wants to switch over to the advanced interface, just log in and select the “switch to advanced” link at the top of your dashboard.

    As of now, the self-service ad platform is still invitation only for U.S. businesses. Twitter says that they will start expanding internationally later this year.

  • National Taxpayers Union Says Americans Oppose Search Engine Regulation

    The debate surrounding search engines and regulation only seems to be increasing with recent developments. Various privacy and consumer groups have encouraged the government to intervene claiming that consumers need to be protected. Although some investigations are pending, the feds have not stepped in with any action yet.

    Is government regulation needed in search engines? Please comment.

    Interestingly, new research reveals how the majority of Americans feel about these issues. A poll from Zogby International and commissioned by the National Taxpayers Union found that most people in the U.S. are satisfied with the search options they currently have and do not want the government to get involved.

    Pete Sepp, the Executive Vice President of NTU, told WebProNews that 87 percent of the more than 2,000 respondents agreed with the following statement: “I feel I can easily switch to a competing search engine if I’m not happy with the results I receive.”

    “The majorities are quite overwhelming,” said Sepp. “In fact, when asked if people thought that they could always switch to a new search if they were dissatisfied with the results they were getting, by nearly an 11-1 margin, they said so… versus those who thought that they were trapped or locked into a current search engine.”

    “There’s obviously a great deal of consumer freedom, as expressed in these poll results,” he added.

    Pete Sepp, Executive Vice President of the National Taxpayers Union Sepp also told us that the skepticism regarding government regulation was also “overwhelming.” When respondents were asked if “the federal government should regulate the content and appearance of search engines and their results,” 64 percent strongly disagreed while only 3 percent strongly agreed.

    “We found overwhelming majorities saying that government had no business in trying to determine how search engine results should appear or how search engines should work in the first place,” said Sepp.

    The NTU found that most consumers believe that if the government gets involved in search engines, that the results would be harmful. Specifically, they think that it would lead to reduced consumer choice and innovation.

    The poll surveyed Americans across various demographic categories, including age, income, educational level, and ideology. However, Sepp pointed out that it was interesting how both self-identified Democrats and Republicans were against government regulation of search engines.

    “It appears that once people are made aware of this issue, [they] are very, very concerned that further government and involvement will simply lead to disastrous results,” he said.

    How would you vote in this poll? Let us know.

    Sepp went on to say that since the message from consumers is loud and clear, the government should “speak very carefully” and “tread very lightly” in these matters.

    If you remember, as WebProNews previously reported, President Obama recently released his privacy proposal that calls for Congress to implement a Consumer Privacy Bill of Rights. NTU is hoping that its findings will be heard by policymakers before they take any steps toward regulating the Web.

    Incidentally, a new report out today from the Pew Internet and American Life Project shows that even though Americans are very satisfied with the quality of search results, they are concerned with how search engines collect and use their data. According to the report, users are particularly concerned with data collection being used to personalize results and for ad targeting purposes.

    In fact, the research found that three-quarters of searchers are against data collection for personalizing results.

    Also, Pew found that two-thirds of Web users have an “unfavorable” view of online targeted advertising because they do not like having their behaviors tracked and analyzed.

    Based on the research from both NTU and Pew, it appears that consumers have mixed feelings about their search experience and privacy. What’s your take? Are you worried about search engines collecting your data but not enough for government to intervene? Or, would like to for the government to regulate these practices? Share your thoughts with us.

  • Google’s New Privacy Policy: Danny Sullivan Provides Insight

    In January, Google announced that it was overhauling its more than 60 privacy policies and replacing them with one. As Alma Whitten, Google’s Director of Privacy in Product and Engineering, wrote in the announcement, the idea is to create a “beautifully simple, intuitive user experience across Google.”

    The search giant said the main change for users would be that it could combine information from one service with its other services, thus providing a more fluid user experience. For example, if you conduct several searches on Google on a particular item, Google could assume that you want a video on that item if you then visit YouTube.

    What do you think of Google’s new privacy policy? Does it affect you at all? We’d love to hear your thoughts.

    Danny Sullivan, Executive Editor of Search Engine Land According to Danny Sullivan, the Executive Editor of Search Engine Land, the new policy will provide users with more personalized results. He told us that it really wasn’t surprising that Google made the change since most other tech and Internet companies have one privacy policy for all their products and services.

    “Google, which kind of has come from privacy policies on a per product basis, is kind of playing catch up, so that they have the ability to be more flexible both in what they may do with the information and how they may use the information to improve products and services,” he said.

    This flexibility is what has some people worried, however. Under the new policy, Google could potentially take the information it gathers when users search to target them with ads. Although Google says it will not do this, the new policy gives it the right if it so chooses.

    “Potentially, it gives Google a lot of new rights,” said Sullivan.

    Privacy groups have voiced numerous concerns over what the new policy could mean. Specifically, the Electronic Privacy and Information Center (EPIC) has even sued the FTC, saying that Google’s new policy violates the settlement the company and the agency reached last year over Google Buzz. The group is asking the FTC to take action that will prevent Google from combining user data “without user content” before the company puts its new policy into effect next month.

    Due to the timing of the matter, a federal district judge ordered the FTC to have its response to EPIC ready today. In return, EPIC is supposed to have its counter response ready by February 21.

    EPIC also filed another complaint this week over the privacy assessments the FTC required Google to take. Google said it was complying with the audits but has, up to this point, kept them closed.

    “I thought that if you’re going to be audited on privacy, then perhaps you ought to release the privacy audits so that… the public could see it,” said Sullivan.

    EPIC claims that the FTC Consent Order required Google to answer detailed questions about privacy and user information but that the search giant did not answer them.

    Interestingly, Forbes featured a report this week stating that the court should dismiss the lawsuit between EPIC and the FTC. According to the report, the privacy group is overstepping its third party right under administrative law.

    Glenn G. Lammi wrote:

    Washington Legal Foundation would be the last one to argue that federal agency actions should be immune from judicial review as a general principle. But once a settlement agreement has been reached between an agency and a private entity, the agency should not be compelled to embrace an outside party’s view that the agreement has been breached. EPIC is welcome to communicate its general views to FTC (which they do so quite often) on the Google Buzz settlement, just as Google might avail FTC of its thoughts on whether a competitor like Facebook or Twitter violated its respective privacy agreement with the Commission. But empowering activists or competitors to imprint their views of consent agreement breach on the Commission would be a dangerous and easily abused tool. If Congress wanted such third parties to inject themselves into FTC’s process on such agreements more formally and authoritatively, it would have said so.

    Sullivan told us that, although he has yet to look closely at EPIC’s case, he doubted the FTC would find Google in any violation.

    Unfortunately for Google though, that’s not where its problems stop. The European Union has also asked it to delay the roll out of the new privacy policy. In a letter to Google’s CEO Larry Page, Jacob Kohnstamm, a European privacy regulator, wrote:

    We wish to check the possible consequences for the protection of the personal data of these citizens in a coordinated procedure. We have therefore asked the French data protection authority, the CNIL, to take the lead. The CNIL has kindly accepted this task and will be your point of contact for the data protection authorities in the EU.

    In light of the above, we call for a pause in the interests of ensuring that there can be no misunderstanding about Google’s commitments to information rights of their users and EU citizens, until we have completed our analysis.

    In a post on its European Public Policy Blog, Google responded to the letter saying it had met with several officials prior to its announcement and briefed them of the changes. It said that no one had any objections at that time and indicated that it would proceed with its plans to implement its new policy in March.

    Most recently, nonprofit Consumer Watchdog wrote a letter to the U.S. House of Representatives’ Commerce, Manufacturing and Trade Subcommittee requesting that Larry Page explain Google’s “disingenuous statements about its supposed commitment to users’ privacy.”

    In this letter, Privacy Project Director John Simpson wrote:

    “If Google were truly committed to “user control,” it would ask users to “opt in” to these substantive changes in its data handling, rather than imposing them across the board… Google’s practices affect millions of Americans. Google is so dominant on the Internet that for many people Google is the Internet.

    You must not allow Google to escape legitimate privacy concerns by sending underlings whose high-sounding pledges prove to be empty or whose answers prove insufficient in closed-door meetings. It is the chief executive who is ultimately responsible for the company’s behavior.”

    What’s more, a Washington Post poll found that 65 percent of users said they would cancel their Google accounts over the privacy changes.

    Sullivan, however, told us that he believes this poll is “99 percent inaccurate.” As he explained, users reacted in this same way when Facebook made changes in 2010. In the end, Facebook grew instead.

    “If they’re that concerned about it, then their alternative is to go to another company that is doing exactly the same thing,” he said. “It really doesn’t come down to what these privacy policies say, it comes down to the kind of controls that you’re provided and given, and ultimately, I think, your trust in the company overall.”

    Ironically, as Matt McGee pointed out, Google quietly launched a new program that allows users to get paid if they use the Chrome browser and share their data with the search engine. It’s called Screenwise and pays users in Amazon gift cards. Although many other companies conduct similar practices in order to learn how they can improve their services, Sullivan told us that the timing of this program was very bad for Google.

    In spite of the backlash, it appears that Google will roll out its new privacy policy March 1. The company currently has an ad campaign to help to alleviate concerns, but Sullivan believes that Google will need to begin doing extensive PR outreach in D.C. as well.

    Does Google’s privacy policy go too far, or is it what you would expect from a company of its size? Let us know what you think in the comments.

  • EXCLUSIVE: Facebook IPO: The Impact on Users and Marketers

    Earlier this week, Facebook began the process for its highly anticipated IPO. The company hopes to raise $5 billion or more in its filing, which is considerable given the company began in a dorm room and has only been around for 8 years.

    Who remembers Facebook in the early days? What update have you liked the most and the least? We’d love to hear your story.

    In spite of all the excitement around the news, there have been some questions regarding the impact of the IPO on users and marketers. Without users, Facebook would not have turned into what it is today, and without marketers, the business value of the platform would not exist. But, does the IPO change this?

    Chris Treadaway, Founder of Polygraph Media and author of Facebook Marketing: An Hour A DayAccording to Chris Treadaway, the founder of Polygraph Media as well as the author of Facebook Marketing: An Hour A Day, Facebook will still have to please its users and marketers but will have the additional strain of maintaining profitability. He says it will face a scrutiny that it’s never been subjected to before.

    “Users will be affected because Facebook will be trying to do everything they can to increase revenues, increase profits, while kind of gradually, incrementally making the user experience a little more… advanced with every passing day,” Treadaway pointed out.

    Facebook faces a tough battle because, on one hand, public markets will demand to know what its plans are, how it will monetize personal data, and what its financials are. On the other side, users may counterattack the company if it feels Facebook is using too much of their personal data to make money.

    Although users often complain about the power of Facebook, Treadaway tells us that he doesn’t think they will be too quick to abandon the service that has brought so many people together, and essentially, kept the world connected.

    “For the last 15 years, we’ve been gradually giving the Internet broadly a lot more of our personal information, and, over time, we’ve gotten a lot more comfortable with what we’ve done,” he said.

    “There are just too many benefits of using Facebook currently… for people to just stop doing it altogether, or be, all of a sudden, so concerned about it that it causes people to use it different ways.”

    On the marketing side, we know that Facebook provides a great opportunity for brands to connect and sell to consumers, which, in turn, creates revenue for both the brands and Facebook. In fact, the filing showed that 83 percent of Facebook’s revenue in 2011 came from advertising.

    “Even though click through rates and impression-based costs have increased a little bit over the last few years… there’s still a ton of room for that to grow,” said Treadaway.

    “If you combine Facebook’s targeting options with the price that people pay at least on an impression basis currently, there’s really no better deal out there on the Internet… and there wouldn’t be even if Facebook increased their rates 3 or 4-fold over time,” he added.

    But since there will be a stronger pressure on Facebook to bring in revenue, questions are being raised about how the company will ramp up its ad platform. Some are speculating that a new behavioral ad targeting system called “Open Graph action spec targeting” could be the answer.

    In a nutshell, these “action specs” are verbs that Facebook collects from the statuses that users provide. Users constantly let Facebook know what they are “watching”, “playing”, “purchasing,” “eating”, and “drinking.” The idea is that Facebook would take these actions and generate leads for brands.

    Treadaway tells us that he believes Facebook will play a more active role between consumers and brands selling goods going forward. He also said tools that help marketers do this would likely be available sometime over the next year.

    How do you see Facebook’s IPO impacting users and marketers? Let us know.

  • Microsoft Makes Mobile Ad Targeting Easier

    Microsoft has launched full HTML device targeting for advertisers, so that they can easily target mobile display ads to all handsets that can render full HTML sites (including sites developed for the PC Web). Such devices include iPhone, Android, and full HTML browser Windows phones and Blackberry devices.

    Microsoft - HTML Targeting

    "Targeting full HTML mobile devices is appealing to advertisers for many reasons," says Raj Kapoor of the Microsoft Mobile Advertising team. "Some advertisers wish to reach this audience segment simply due to their increased consumption of mobile media products. Other advertisers wish to use full HTML targeting to target Rich Media ad campaigns to devices that support these advanced mobile ad units, or simply to drive consumers to a more engaging full HTML page designed for mobile screens."

    "Still other advertisers wish to enter the mobile advertising space but have not yet optimized their website to render on feature phones or other less featured mobile browsers," he adds. "While these advertisers recognize that the ideal consumer experience is to create a dedicated mobile web site for all mobile users, including those with devices capable of displaying sites originally created for the PC web, full HTML device targeting allows them to easily extend their online campaigns into mobile and reach this engaged mobile audience by driving these sophisticated users to their online destinations."

    In the past, as Kapoor explains, advertisers had to keep an up-to-date list of every mobile device with a full HTML mobile browser, and individually target each one. The new feature should drastically reduce the headache associated with that.

    The list of such devices continues to grow rapidly, particularly as smartphone usage becomes more and more broad. It is important to advertisers that they reach as many devices as possible if they’re campaign is not targeted at users of just one of them.
     

    Related Articles:

    > Google Narrows Down Mobile Ad Targeting

    > Opera Scoops Up Mobile Advertising Firm AdMarvel

    > Google Buys Mobile Ad Firm For $750 Million In Stock