WebProNews

Tag: +1 button

  • Google Just Gave The +1 More Meaning

    Google launched the +1 button before it even launched Google+. It’s always been a way to send social signals to Google, and help it determine what content people like. This helps the personalized search experience for one thing.

    But while the +1 button has long given you the option to post a piece of content to the Google+ stream, just +1ing something without specifically sharing it publicly or with a particular person or circle has been pretty much guaranteed to go unnoticed by others, unless they happened to be digging around your profile looking at your +1 list or see it come up in their search results.

    Now, Google is going to start highlighting +1’d content in the stream on its own. Google will “occasionally” highlight posts that were +1’d by people in your circles, and highlight your +1s to your friends.

    Google plus one button in stream

    This is pretty good news for bloggers and publishers because it gives content a greater chance of reaching more eyeballs. You can always see how many +1’s you get on an article or blog post, but you never know how many of those are actually being shared to people. You probably still won’t know, but at least you’ll know that Google might put the post in more people’s streams.

    As Google’s Shimrit Ben-Yair, who announced the new feature on Google+, notes, users can control who sees their +1s highlighted in the stream using the settings. If you don’t want anybody to see them, you can adjust the settings accordingly.

    “In all cases: friends will only see +1s and posts they already had permission to see, we’re just calling extra attention to them,” says Ben-Yair. “And of course: if you’re seeing too much activity from a given circle, you can always turn down its volume, or exclude it from Home entirely.”

    The feature will be rolling out over the course of the next several days.

  • How To Connect Your Google+ Page To Your AdWords Campaigns

    As you may know, Google lets you tie the +1’s of your Google+ Page to your site, your search results, and your AdWords ads. The company announced a new AdWords feature called Social Extensions, which is how you include your AdWords campaigns.

    “Currently (and for campaigns that don’t have Social Extensions enabled) your AdWords ads only show +1’s from people who have +1’d that ad’s landing page,” explains Dan Friedman of Google’s Inside AdWords Crew. “This limits the likelihood that someone who sees your ad will have a friend or contact who’s recommended it. By enabling Social Extensions on your ad campaigns you’re able to leverage all the +1’s your brand has received, whether it be on a search result, on your Google+ Page, your website or on your ads, making it more likely that someone who sees your ad will have a friend or contact who has recommended it.”

    “We believe that this has the potential to improve your overall ad performance,” he adds. “In fact, 71% of shoppers say that recommendations from friends and family impact their purchasing decisions. These additional recommendations may result in more conversions and deeper engagement with your business overall.”

    That stat comes from a Harris Interactive poll from last year. There’s a good chance that the number is even greater now, with social penetrating search more and more.

    There is also a new reporting segment for AdWords, which Google says will help advertisers better understand the impact of social annotations on their campaigns. Advertisers can now segment campaigns by ad groups, keywords or by +1 annotations.

    +1 annotations will let you view metrics for impressions where the viewer had a friend or contact that +1’d your brand, impressions that included an anonymous count of people who +1’d your brand, and impressions without any social annotations. The segment works with all campaigns, regardless of whether or not you enabled Social Extensions.

    You can enable Social Extensions by clicking “Ad Extensions” in your AdWords account and finding the option in the rop down menu. Choose new extension. Google will ask you to add your verified Google+ Page URL.

    Social Extensions

    Google talks about how to get your Profile or Page verified here. “If we think you or your page might benefit from a badge, we’ll reach out to manually verify you,” the company says. “If you believe a profile or page is impersonating you or your business, report the profile or page and select the ‘Impersonation’ option.

    If you have a verified profile or page and change your name, even by a single character, your verification status will be reset and you’ll need to be re-verified.”

    If you change the Page associated with your AdWords campaign, the campaign will begin adding +1’s on your ad to the Page’s total.

    Social extensions are available in all countries. Advertisers will be charged for standard clicks on text ads when users click the ad text, but not when a user +1’s the ad.

    Social extensions can appear in an ad when it’s shown on Google.com as well as throughout the Google Display Network. That applies to both desktop and mobile. The feature is compatible with all AdWords targeting options.

    The feature is not “yet” accessible via AdWords Editor or the AdWords API. Given that Google made a point of saying “yet,” I assume that will change in the future.

  • Google+ Just Got More Critical to Search

    It’s been clear from the beginning that Google+ would play a major role in search, and as time has gone on, we’ve seen various glimpses of this, whether it be the +1 buttons, Google connecting authors to their Google Profiles, or adding Circle counts and Google+ comments to search results.

    Today, Google announced the launch of Pages for businesses, brands and products. More on this here.

    Along with these pages comes the ability for people to add your page to their Circles from search results. They can do this one of two ways: adding from the search result, or by using Google+ Direct Connect, which lets you enter a “+” with the Page you’re looking for as the query:

    Along with Pages, Google is also launching badges and icons that sites can add, to connect their site to their Page. These will be available in the coming days. People can add your page to their Circles right from your site.

    This is all bound to be very helpful for brands, and we all know that social signals are a considerable part of what Google is looking at these days.

    But perhaps even more significant yet, is this next part. Google+ Pages Product Management Director Dennis Troper writes on the Inside AdSense blog:

    You can also link your site to your Google+ page so that all your +1s — from your Page, your website, and search results — will get tallied together and appear as a single total. Potential visitors will be more likely to see the recommendations your site has received, whether they’re looking at a search result, your website, or your Page, meaning your +1’s will reach not only the 40 million users of Google+, but all the people who come to Google every day. You can link your site to your Page either using the Google+ badge or with a piece of code. To set this up, visit our Google+ badge configuration tool.

    So, this should help your site get associated with more +1’s altogether, and Google has been very clear about this being used as a ranking factor from day one.

  • Google Adds +Snippets to Google Maps

    Last month, Google made the +1 button more like the Facebook “like” button for Google+ in the sense that when you click the button, you can now share content to your Google+ Circles. When you share content from the button, it automatically includes a link, an image and a description in the sharebox. Google calls these “+snippets”.

    Google announced today that it is now including +snippets in Google Maps, making it easier to share Maps content with your Circles.

    “Suppose you’re planning a weekend trip to Napa,” says Google VP of of Product Management Bradley Horowitz. “Your packing list probably includes driving directions, hotel information and a list of nearby wineries. Many of you visit Google Maps for this kind of information already. But with +snippets, Google+ users can easily share directions or places (for example) with fellow travelers. Just click “Share…” in the Google+ bar at the top of the screen, and whatever you see on Maps is what you’ll see in the sharebox—ready to share with your circles.”

    “With today’s launch, Google Maps joins other Google products like Books, Offers and Product Search in having +snippets,” he adds. “And like Maps, what you see onscreen is what you share—just click on “Share…” in the Google+ bar to reveal the +snippet.”

    +Snippets on Google Products

    +Snippets on Google Products

    +Snippets on Google Products

    Google says it will roll out +snippets to more Google products in the future as part of its quest to “make sharing across Google just as easy” as sharing other content with the +1 button.

    Which Google products would you like to see +snippets added to?

  • Why You Can’t Game Google and Bing with +1s and Likes

    Why You Can’t Game Google and Bing with +1s and Likes

    Social is more important to search rankings than ever. There’s no doubt about that.

    Should +1s and Facebook “likes” be used as significant ranking signals by search engines? Share your thoughts here.

    In a recent article, we asked if Google’s +1 button is the new PageRank. As Google uses the data from the button as a ranking signal, +1’s will no doubt be coveted more and more by any site owner looking for increased search visibility and traffic.

    As discussed in that article, just as you’ve seen plenty trying to boost their PageRank through black hat tactics, it seems highly likely that these same people will try to exploit the +1 button. Google’s main weapon agains this appears to be tying the +1s to your actual identity, by using a strict profile naming policy.

    Google wants to know who is doing this +1ing, which should help cut down on abuse.

    Bing’s Duane Forrester wrote a blog post this week talking about a similar topic in the realm of abusing the social signals that search engines use to try and determine what results to show users. Forrester’s focus was on the concept of the “like” farm – basically the social equivalent of the link farm.

    Amazingly, though, people think this approach works,” says Forrester. “The rationale being that social signals matter to search, they can ramp up the volume of the ‘like’ signal in Facebook, causing a related boost in rankings.  The logic may seem fine, but when you recall that we can see sudden explosions of links as spammy, it’s easy to understand how we can see sudden explosions of likes as spammy as well.  To be fair, there’s more to it than that.”

    “Anyone could suddenly ‘go viral’ and accumulate a lot of likes very quickly, so we look beyond just like/time to find patterns,” he explains. “And if there is one thing a search engine is good at, it’s seeing patterns online.  Like farms tend to be built around a core network of accounts.  You pay someone to like your site, content or whatever, and they go out across their network and like you.  It’s artificial and we know it.  Organic likes rarely follow obvious patterns.  In fact, if there’s a pattern to organic liking, it’s one built around chaos.  Like farms, however, no matter their size, end up looking obvious by comparison.  In the image below, you can see what an accumulation of likes look like to us when graphed.”

    He shares the following graph depicting like activity with the red dots representing a like’s origin and the blue dots representing friends liking the same item. He says the differences between like farm activity and organic activity are “very obvious”.

    Like Farm Activity

    “In most cases, if we spot like farm activity, we simply ignore the signal,” says Forrester.  “Again, you may have paid for a service which is bringing you no value in boosting your search results. This also points out why it is so important that you manage your social media program.  At the very least, if you are outsourcing the management of your social program, you need to keep an eye on things.  Short cuts can add up eroding any value you were trying to achieve.”

    I’m not going to sit here and tell you that it is impossible to game the search engines using social media. Black hatters will always look for (and probably find) new ways to exploit the system for their gain, but that doesn’t mean it’s going to be easy.

    Interestingly, a report out from BrightEdge finds that about half of the largest 10,000 sites on the web don’t even display any kind of social sharing link or buttons at all. This is very surprising. As one WebProNews reader commented, “I find that unbelievable! The search engines have flat out admitted that social signals are a ranking factors. Why would a site owner not want to include social share buttons? Let your readers do some of the heavy lifting and get your content promoted in their social networks!”

    I would strongly advise making the buttons accessible. Just have the content to give users a reason to click them. Then maybe you won’t have to worry about trying to game the system.

    Do you think Google and Bing can keep social button abuse at bay? Tell us what you think.

  • Google +1 Button The New PageRank?

    Google +1 Button The New PageRank?

    Let me start off by being very clear. Google is not getting rid of PageRank in favor of the +1 button. Google is, however, looking at the data from the +1 button as a signal of content quality, and +1s will no doubt continue to be largely coveted by webmasters and content creators web-wide.

    Will +1s become more important than PageRank? Just as important? Share your thoughts here.

    It’s been pretty clear since Google first announced the +1 button (even before they announced Google+) that the feature was designed to send Google signals for quality content. It was essentially billed as a way for web users to tell Google when a piece of content is good enough to be considered a good search result.

    Wired is running a story now saying that Google has confirmed its plans of turning the button into “a crowdsourcing tool that helps re-order search results and fight web spam”.

    “Google will study the clicks on +1 buttons as a signal that influences the ranking and appearance of websites in search results,” a Google spokesperson is quoted as saying. “The purpose of any ranking signal is to improve overall search quality. For +1’s and other social ranking signals, as with any new ranking signal, we’ll be starting carefully and learning how those signals are related to quality.”

    Of course it is unwise to place too much emphasis on just a single ranking signal. At least that’s what Google would have webmasters believe. They’re tossing around very similar language with regard to the +1 button ranking as they historically have when people worry about PageRank too much: “There are more than 200 signals that we use to determine the rank of a website, and last year we made more than 500 improvements to the algorithm.”

    Just as you’ve seen plenty trying to boost their PageRank through black hat tactics, it does not seem unreasonable to assume that these same people will try to exploit the +1 button. A major weapon against this that Google has is its strict Google+ account name policy, which has been a bit controversial thus far.

    It became clear in recent days that Google+ is all about identity as far as Google is concerned. Eric Schmidt drove this point home, as discussed here. While this makes sense for a variety of reasons (including the potential integration of Google+ with products like Google Wallet), it also makes a great deal of sense in that it shows Google exactly who is +1ing what, which should in turn help them enforce any policy (current or future) concerning abuse of the button for gaming search.

    In terms of white hat tactics, you may do well to consider things like this research comScore just shared. +1’s now mean more sharing of content to the actual Google+ network – people’s circles, which should (in theory) translate to increased traffic from Google+ itself. So, it may help to know about the kinds of people who are using Google+, as opposed to Facebook, for example. comScore’s data looks at those searches containing the Google+ and Facebook brands. It’s probably not exact, but many of those searching for Google+ content are likely going to be users of the service.

    “The most striking differences between Google+ searchers and Facebook searchers are in Age and Income level,” says Eli Goodman, who leads the business development team at comScore. “Google+ searchers overwhelmingly skew towards 18-34 year olds. Clearly Google+ is a popular brand with the younger segments, and good knowledge for Google to have as they develop their acquisition strategy and evolve their user base. Since Facebook is a much more mature brand in the social networking space, their search audience falls closely in line with the search population at large.”

    “The income skews are even more distinct, essentially polar opposites of each other,” he adds. “More than 32% of Google+ searchers have a household income of $100K or greater, compared to 23% of Facebook searchers. Google+ is definitely off to a fast start in reaching the most desirable income segments, which may make it more attractive to advertisers.”

    google plus search vs facebook search - comscore

    Google’s quest for quality

    In terms of Google using the +1 button as a way to combat spam, this also goes hand in hand with another new(ish) announcement from Google that it is calling upon users to report scrapers in some new algorithm testing.

    “We are asking for examples, and may use data you submit to test and improve our algorithms,” the company says on a “Report Scraper Pages” form, found here.

    Scrapers getting you down? Tell us about blog scrapers you see: http://t.co/6HPhROS We need datapoints for testing. 3 days ago via Tweet Button · powered by @socialditto

    This followed another recent announcement from Cutts about a major refresh to Google’s spam reporting process.

    Google seems to be putting more emphasis on quality of results than ever before (I haven’t even mentioned the Panda update in this article…or the domain blocking tools Google launched this year). It does appear that Google’s grand social plan with Google+ is a major factor in that, and is sure to have everyone clamoring for +1s, which will not only provide a boost in ranking signals for content, but potentially traffic from the social network itself. And you can bet that WHO is +1ing things matters, just like with PageRank – WHO you’re getting links from matters.

    Between things like Google’s emphasis on identity with Google+ itself and the authorship markup it’s pushing (which links people to their Google profiles), it’s clear that who you are matters in the Google world, and that also means that it matters who THEY (the people +1ing your content) undoubtedly matters too. Build your personal brand.

    Is the +1 the new PageRank? Tell us what you think.

  • Google Announces +1 Button E-Commerce Partners

    Google says it has been working with Bazaarvoice and PowerReviews to make it easier for online retailers to get the +1 button on their product pages.

    As you may know, Google has launched new sharing feature for the +1 button, essentially turning it into Google+‘s version of Facebook’s “like” button. Before, clicking +1 told Google that content would make for good search results. Now, it allows users to share content with their circles of friends too.

    Google is already pushing the potential benefits this can have on online retail.

    “We’re excited about the +1 button because it brings these personal recommendations to a place where many purchase decisions start — the Google search results page,” says Google Strategic Partner Manager Brian Lam. “Adding +1 buttons to your product pages makes it easy for your customers to recommend the products they love on your site with a single click. And thanks to recent improvements to the +1 button, they can take the conversation even further by sharing your products right away on Google+.”

    “We’ve worked with Bazaarvoice and PowerReviews to make it even easier to get the +1 button on your pages. Both companies have extensive experience in social commerce, and can help you develop the right strategy for implementing +1 buttons on your site,” says Lam. “Looking for a couple examples of retailers using +1 to help their products stand out on Google search? Jockey (working with PowerReviews) and Golfsmith (working with Bazaarvoice) have already added +1 buttons to the product pages on their sites.”

    Bazaarvoice is enabling clients to implement the +1 button through its social platform.

    “The next evolution of social brings our friends and peers into every decision we make, and we’re excited to partner again with Google to allow consumers to interact with leading brands through search in ways never possible before,” said Brett Hurt, founder and CEO of Bazaarvoice.

    PowerReviews Uses Plus One Button

    Google’s +1 button is available to PowerReviews customers as part of its core ratings and review product.

    “Google’s +1 represents an important step in the evolution of social commerce, because it gives retailers a way to capture the enthusiasm their customers have for their products and broadcast it across the web,” said PowerReviews CEO Pehr Luedtke. “Perhaps most importantly, this isn’t social simply for the sake of social, it’s a way for retailers to drive real business results by leveraging the power of recommendations made between friends and peers.”

    Of course you don’t have to go through either Bazaarvoice or PowerReviews to implement the button. You can simply install the code yourself, but for those using these platforms, it should be even easier.

  • Google +1 Button Comes to Android Market

    Update: Now, Google has announced new sharing options for the +1 button, which allow users to post content back to their circles. This could make the visibility factor for apps go up even more.

    Google released an update for the Android Market today, adding the Google +1 button to apps. This could be a major factor for Android developers in getting their apps seen by consumers.

    AndroidCentral shared the following video, which shows the button in the market:

    The +1 button itself is presumably getting a lot more clicks since Google launched Google+ the social network. It’s kind of become Google’s version of the “like” button, and why its main purpose is to tell Google which content people like, to help improve search results, I get the feeling people are not too worried about the search aspect and are just clicking it in general. That’s good for anyone trying to have their search visibility boosted.

    Last week, Google announced that Android was up to 150 million devices activated.

    Interestingly, a recent Nielsen report found that the top 10 Android apps account for 43% of all time spent on by Android consumers on mobile apps. Perhaps that +1 button will help some of the lesser known apps rise up.

    Android App Use

    In other Android app news, Google also just launched the Google TV add-on to the Android SDK, so developers can start designing and optimizing their apps for the TV experience.

  • +1 Button on AdWords: Paying for What You Could Get for Free?

    Before Google unleashed its new social network Google+, it launched the +1 button, which appears on content sites across the web, in Google search results, and on Google’s AdWords ads. Now that the button appears in the Google+ stream as well, it’s likely that the +1 buttons everywhere will get clicked more.

    What if you don’t want the feature on your ads though? Do you have a choice? Perhaps you feel like it could lead to more clicks that you don’t want to pay for. One advertiser shared a story with WebProNews about just such a scenario, and discussed his struggle trying to opt out of the feature, which has so far been unsuccessful.

    Should advertisers be able to opt out from having +1 buttons on their search ads? Tell us what you think.

    First, here’s how Google explains the +1 button in relation to AdWords:

    When making decisions, people often turn to those they trust for recommendations. Now with the +1 button, people can recommend your site’s content or ads to their friends and contacts right when their advice is most useful – on Google search.

    Let’s say you own a hotel in Madrid. Brian is having a lovely stay at your hotel, and visits your site to look up local attractions. He sees the +1 button you’ve added to your page, and clicks it to recommend your business to his friends and contacts.

    When Brian’s friend Ann plans her trip to Spain, she signs in to her Google account, searches on Google, and also sees your hotel’s ad – plus the personalized annotation that Brian +1’d it. Knowing that Brian recommends your hotel helps Ann decide where to stay during her travels.

    “I was informed by a standard email presumably sent to all AdWords advertisers advising of +1 and explaining that AdWords would be visible within the +1 social network, meaning that if Bill clicks on my advert then all of Bill’s +1 friends are also shown my advert and therefore invited to click on it also,” Jon, an AdWords advertiser tells WebProNews.

    Jon’s business is a campground, and he claims to have strong geographic and language preferences, and his AdWords account set so that his ads only appear on search engine results. “I am an ex IT consultant and very Internet savvy,” he says. “I fine tune my AdWords campaigns.”

    “I don’t want to have my adverts shown on the +1 network,” he tells us. “The principle reason is that I only want to spend money reaching totally virgin customers. The reason for this is that campers are social animals, and as soon as Bill finds a great campground he will tell all his camping buddies. I don’t need help from Google getting referrals via this mechanism. Once Bill knows I am content to wait until Bill tells his friends verbally or via email, that does not cost me a dime.”

    “The other objection is that Bill may have friends in other geographic locations who may speculatively click on my advert as exposed to them via Bill and the +1 network, whereas previously I could limit geographic scope on my AdWords campaign,” he adds. “And Bill is intelligent enough to know which of his online buddies lives too far away to find my campground of interest – and anyway I am not paying for Bill’s verbal or email recommendations.”

    Jon pointed to the hassle he has had trying to opt out of +1’s on his ads. “Last time I looked there was no ‘+1′ opt out on the AdWords users’ control panel – I expected just to login and tick the appropriate ‘NO’ box and all would be cool (I was still irritated that I was opted in by default, but hey they are trying to make money aren’t they?).”

    “Nope – you have to hunt around documentation to find a buried ‘opt out form’. By buried I mean that Google clearly don’t want you to find it easily,” he says. “You have to read FAQs and things first.”

    The form looks like this:

    Opt Out form for +1 Button on AdWords

    “When I tried the form it didn’t work. It failed to give a confirmation page and instead indicated a field error by stipulating ‘required field’ in red, but unfortunately this was next to the very tick box that I deselected to indicate that I wanted to opt out,” he says. “I worked in IT for 15 years and I can design a bug free form in my sleep but Google engineers needed two attempts over two weeks with me sending screen shots and verifying that I had tried multiple browsers and so on.”

    “After about two weeks of Googles ‘experts’ working on the issue they got the form working so I was able to indicate that I wanted to opt out,” he continues. “Then I followed up by indicating my lack of confidence in this whole setup with the Google guy who has been handling my case and asked when I was going to actually hear anything . You see, the opt out option is not a ‘right’ or an immediate thing – it is a ‘REQUEST’.”

    Jon claims a Google employee told him:

    Hi Jon,

    I spoke with the PM responsible for this and he re-iterated the following:

    »Submitting this form is not a guarantee that your campaigns will be opted
    out of social features.” This is clearly stated on the submission form
    itself.«

    If his request were to be granted then you would be contacted as also
    explicitly stated on the form.

    >From the form: “We will review these requests and may contact you at the
    e-mail address provided.” – notice it says may, not will.

    “So you see I have only managed to get on the waiting lists to be ‘CONSIDERED’ for opt out, and apparently I can only be sure that I will be contacted if my ‘REQUEST IS GRANTED’,” Jon says. “May I reiterate here that I am ‘requesting’ the right to decide how my advertising revenue is spent. I know my customers and I believe that the +1 network will deliver only what I get for free right now but at a price.”

    “I am not against +1 or its incorporation into AdWords, but I am really annoyed that Google has first of all opted me in by default, then provided me with a buggy opt out mechanism that takes two weeks to fix, and then tells me as if a royal speaking to a subject that what I consider to be a ‘DEMAND’ is actually a ‘REQUEST’, and that I ‘MAY’ be contacted if they decide to ‘GRANT’ me the right to decide how my money is spent.”

    What do you think of Jon’s story? Should opting out of this feature be a right or is it simply Google’s right to handle this feature of its product how it sees fit? Tell us what you think in the comments.

  • Google Adds +1s to Google Takeout

    In late June, Google’s Data Liberation Front announced the launch of Google Takeout, which it called its “first revolutionary product.” Its function is to let you take your data out of more than one Google product at a time.

    Today, the Data Liberation Front announced that you can now take out the sites that you’ve +1’ed. “We’ve still got plenty more data to liberate — including +1’s on stream posts and comments — but we just wanted to give you a quick update,” says Brian Fitzpatrick on the Data Liberation Front blog.

    There’s now more data available on the Google Takeout menu: sites you’ve +1’ed, http://t.co/yFN7Rk6 (via @dataliberation) 27 minutes ago via web · powered by @socialditto

    This could be useful if you use Google+ as a kind of bookmarking tool, but stop using the service at some point. It might be useful to have that information if somewhere down the line you’re doing some research and are looking for a specific article, but otherwise can’t remember it.

    Google has said that +1’s influence search rankings. It’s unclear what influence it would have if you removed your existing +1’s.

    Frankly, I can’t imagine that a very large amount of people would even bother, but it is worth noting. I’m not even sure how much these buttons are getting clicked on a large scale any way. I do think they’ll get clicked more as Google+ gets more users, but even then, there might be some confusion as to just what the +1 button is for. I talked about this more here.

    As far as data liberation goes, Google Takeout also lets you take out data from Buzz, Contacts and Circles, Picasa Web Albums, Profile, and Stream. They’ll add more in time. If you want your Buzz stuff, you might want to consider getting an archive of that soon.

  • Is Google Creating Too Much Confusion Around Google+?

    I was perusing a thread at WebmasterWorld about how people are trying to get more traffic from Google’s +1 button, and one person’s comments kind of drove home a point I’ve been thinking about lately.

    Regarding the +1 button, member Shatner said:

    Here’s a personal anecdote to illustrate the uphill battle here.

    Tonight I was talking to a friend of mine, a friend who I know visits my site religiously, 5 – 10 times a day.

    He IM’d me and said, “Hey have you heard about this new +1 thing Google is doing? I heard about it on the radio. You should add that to your site.”

    To which I responded, “I’ve had the +1 button on my site for a month now!”

    To which he responded, “Oh is that what that is? I saw it, but didn’t know what it was for.”

    Since the guy apparently only recently heard about it on the radio, I have to wonder if he was confusing it with Google+ which has been the subject of much more press coverage since its announcement. To the average user of a site, who doesn’t follow news about Google religiously, it’s hardly unlikely that a lot of people will assume the +1 button is directly related to Google+.

    Sure, it’s related to some extent. There are +1 buttons on posts in Google+. One could hardly blame someone for assuming it’s like the Facebook “like” button for Google+. This isn’t the case though. If you hit a +1 article on an article on the web, it’s not going to show up in the stream (the Google+ News feed if you will). It’s going to show up in a separate tab on your Google Profile (and everyone’s rushing to check that out right?). This could change, but that’s how it works for now.

    I’ve shown skepticism about just how much the average web user would be compelled to click “+1” on any given article, even before the launch of Google+. Google+ hasn’t done much to change this other than the fact some might be misled into thinking it’s going to share it to their Google+ accounts.

    That’s not to say that there won’t be more integrations in the future. Googlers are taking to the new social network to connect with users for feedback on improving the service and finding new and useful ways to implement it.

    Of course plenty still don’t even know what Google+ itself is. When I asked my Facebook friends (many of which are just people I know in real life, and are not necessarily big followers of the tech and marketing industries) if anyone wanted or needed a Google+ invite, there might as well have been an animated gif of a tumbleweed blowing by. Then someone finally asked, “What’s that?” Eventually one person asked for an invite (not the person that asked what it was, despite my offer of an explanation).

    There are several possible reasons for the lack of response:

    1. The status update didn’t make it into everyone’s news feeds (likely).
    2. They are already on Google+ (Not so much. I haven’t been able to find many of them on there.).
    3. They don’t want to bother with another social network (likely – see obstacle 1 from this article).
    4. They don’t even know what that is, and therefore don’t have much reason to request an invitation.

    Things will probably change in that regard. It’s had strong buzz among early adopters, and Google will continue to push it and integrate it with various products. The branding will come. As the integrations come, it will start to make more sense to more people, I think.

    In terms of the +1 button, I think as more people use Google+, we might see more people clicking it, but right now, it’s missing that “check this out” feel of the like button, simply because nobody’s “checking out” your +1’s. That’s my gut feeling, anyway.

    To me, it feels like the +1 button is likely to only be clicked (for the most part) by search-savvy people, and those trying to game it (see aforementioned WebmasterWorld thread). That’s hardly representative of people who use Google, which means that it maybe it shouldn’t necessarily be indicative of quality results.

    Feel free to disagree.