Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the updraftplus domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /var/www/html/dev.webpronews.com/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114

Warning: session_start(): Session cannot be started after headers have already been sent in /var/www/html/dev.webpronews.com/public_html/wp-content/themes/wpn_theme/templates/mc-sub-group.php on line 2
More People Think Facebook, Twitter Negatively Affect News Quality «

More People Think Facebook, Twitter Negatively Affect News Quality

A new survey from Craig Newmark’s pro-philanthropy initiative, craigconnects, shows that social media isn’t really making any headway in changing how people get news about politics and ele...
More People Think Facebook, Twitter Negatively Affect News Quality
Written by

A new survey from Craig Newmark’s pro-philanthropy initiative, craigconnects, shows that social media isn’t really making any headway in changing how people get news about politics and elections. Furthermore, most who participated in the survey said that social media sites like Facebook and Twitter had a negative effect on the quality of news in the United States.

It’s not just social media that’s getting the negative reviews as respondents didn’t really find any of the six media outlets included in the survey – newspapers, cable news, network news, talk radio, internet news sites, and blogs & social media – to be all that trustworthy. Obviously, such a low opinion of all news sources isn’t great news but when it comes to social media sites, only 6% of people said they think the news found on social media is actually credible. As far as how the quality of the news was reflected on social media, 34% felt that it had a negative effects on the quality of the news.

“Most people aren’t getting hard election news from social media,” Newmark said, who is also the founder of craigslist. “Tech folks and early adapters are, but not most people, not yet.”

Newmark opined on how he felt all news sources could boost their credibility among audiences. “It’s called fact-checking, and there are a lot of good people working on it,” he said. “They’re looking at ways to help the news media hold candidates and other public figures accountable for what they tell the public. So far it’s hard, and it’s not inexpensive, but it’s really important.”

Newmark also identified one of the greatest perils of SEO journalism: rumors. “People often hear rumors, report it on social media and then the news outlets scramble to get on top of the story and sometimes things are not fact-checked enough in today’s battle to scoop the news first,” he told WebProNews. “Overwhelmingly, I hear that people have kind of given up on trusting political news.”

As you’ll see below, Newmark put together an infographic that displays the full findings from the survey.

(To see a larger version of this graphic, go here.)

Subscribe for Updates

SocialMediaNews Newsletter

SocialMediaNews

By signing up for our newsletter you agree to receive content related to ientry.com / webpronews.com and our affiliate partners. For additional information refer to our terms of service.
Get the WebProNews newsletter delivered to your inbox

Get the free daily newsletter read by decision makers

Subscribe
Advertise with Us

Ready to get started?

Get our media kit