WebProNews

Category: Retail & eCommerce

eCommerce, Online Retail & Retail News

  • Adobe Ditches Creative Suite In Favor Of Creative Cloud

    Adobe Ditches Creative Suite In Favor Of Creative Cloud

    For years, Adobe has sold its professional design software under the Creative Suite banner. There were hints that was going to change when Adobe stopped selling CS6 at retail, but the company has moved to kill Creative Suite faster than anybody expected.

    Adobe announced at its annual MAX conference that it will no longer be releasing new versions of its software under the Creative Suite banner. Instead, all future updates and features will be delivered via Creative Cloud. In other words, those who buy Creative Suite 6 will only get just that while all new features to Photoshop and the like will only be available via Creative Cloud.

    The move to Creative Cloud, which is a subscription service, has upset some members of the Adobe user community. The complaints were excellently captured in a new video released by our favorite Taiwanese animators at NMA:

    Adobe says that it’s moving to a subscription-only model because it will allow them to deliver updates to users at a faster rate:

    “We launched Creative Cloud a year ago and it has been a runaway success,” said David Wadhwani, senior vice president and general manager, Digital Media, Adobe. “By focusing our energy — and our talented engineers — on Creative Cloud, we’re able to put innovation in our members’ hands at a much faster pace.”

    To convince current CS6 users to move to Creative Cloud, Adobe is offering discounts on the subscription service for a limited time. You can check out all the different Creative Cloud plans here.

  • YouTube Subscription Fees May Soon Be A Reality

    YouTube Subscription Fees May Soon Be A Reality

    Are YouTube subscription fees almost upon us? A recent report suggests that the oft rumored feature is soon to be announced.

    The Daily Mail reports that Google will introduce a YouTube subscription fee this week. The new initiative will allow channels to monetize their content with direct contributions from fans, instead of relying upon ad revenue.

    The current report suggests that Google will add 25 to 50 channels to the initial rollout of its subscription service. It will also reportedly cost as little as $2 a month per channel, and doing so will provide a few perks to the subscribers. The biggest, of course, is exclusive content only available to subscribers. The videos will also reportedly be ad-free.

    The current rumors, however, don’t address what YouTube intends to offer to non-subscribers. Will subscriber content only be available to those who pay? Or will YouTube allow non-subscribers to watch some content with the support of advertising?

    Alongside channel subscriptions, previous rumors also suggested that YouTube would begin monetizing live events. In other words, users could pay a small fee to watch major live events, like the Red Bull Stratos Jump from last year.

    There’s still too many variables to even think about with a platform as big as YouTube. The announcement is expected to come sometime this week though. We’ll continue to keep an eye for any such announcement, and bring you all the details as soon as it happens.

  • Staples Becomes The First Major Retail Store To Sell 3D Printers

    Staples Becomes The First Major Retail Store To Sell 3D Printers

    3D printers are still very much intended for industry professionals or hobbyists. That’s going to change within the next five years though, and Staples has decided to get a head start.

    3ders reports that Staples will start offering 3D Systems’ Cube 3D printer at physical store locations by the end of June. If you can’t wait, you can buy the Cube through Staple’s online store today for the relatively low price of $1,299.

    “Staples is excited to bring the power of 3D printing to our customers, by being the first major U.S. retailer to announce the availability of this innovative technology that lets you create fully formed objects in your home or small business,” said Mike Edwards, Staples executive vice president, merchandising.

    Now this is actually a pretty big deal. Before today’s announcement, those looking for 3D printers had to buy them straight from the manufacturer. Retailers were probably cautious about stocking 3D printers because the high price ensures the technology will be a niche product for at least the next few years. With Staples throwing its support behind it, we might see other retailers stocking 3D printers, including cheaper models.

    The Cube from Staples comes with all the benefits of buying one from 3D Systems. In other words, you get to choose your color, including green and pink printers. There’s a wide selection of plastic cartridges, including the more unique materials, as well.

  • Millennials Are Willing to Barter Their Privacy, Shows Study

    A new study shows that the current debate about online privacy may wane as those who grew up online begin to take over. The survey, conducted at the University of Southern Calfornia (USC), shows that members of the Millennial generation hold very different conceptions of privacy compared to their parents and grandparents.

    Millennials, defined as those aged 18-34, were found to be more willing to allow companies track them or access their personal information compared to those 35 and older. Millennials were also found to be more receptive to the idea of targeted advertising, and were much more active on social media. All of this, though, is predicated on receiving some benefit for the lack of privacy.

    “Millennials think differently when it comes to online privacy,” said Elaine Coleman, managing director of media and emerging technologies for Bovitz, the research firm that conducted the survey in conjunction with USC. “It’s not that they don’t care about it – rather they perceive social media as an exchange or an economy of ideas, where sharing involves participating in smart ways.”

    Though the social benefit of most social media is clear, even more tangible benefits still don’t seem to entice those over 35 as much as they do Millennials. One question, for example, asked whether a survey respondent would reveal their location to a company in exchange for coupons to nearby businesses. 56% of Millennials would share their location, but only 42% of older respondents said they would.

    “Online privacy is dead – Millennials understand that, while older users have not adapted,” said Jeffrey Cole, director of the USC Annenberg Center for the Digital Future. “Millennials recognize that giving up some of their privacy online can provide benefits to them. This demonstrates a major shift in online behavior – there’s no going back.”

    Millennial privacy infographic
    (Infographic courtesy the USC Annenberg Center for the Digital Future)

    (via BGR)

  • Etsy Launches Etsy Wholesale In Beta, New Digital Goods Delivery Process

    Etsy Launches Etsy Wholesale In Beta, New Digital Goods Delivery Process

    Etsy announced that the launch of Etsy Wholesale beta. The previously announced product is now live.

    “For the past few months, we’ve been doing in-person usability tests, building the site features of what we hope will be the ultimate place for professional buyers and independent designers to connect online,” writes Etsy Wholesale program manager Vanessa Bertozzi. “And now we’re excited to embark on the next — and most crucial — step towards making this marketplace a reality: to populate the marketplace with retail-ready products from remarkable designers.”

    Etsy Wholesale is free for buyers, but they still need to apply. It will be free to vendors during the beta period. Fees will apply once it’s out of beta. Criteria for what can be sold on Etsy Wholesale can be found here.

    “We are carefully doing more research here because Etsy Wholesale needs to make enough money to cover the costs of building and maintaining a professional marketplace, but we also want it to have a fair and straightforward pricing model, one that works for vendors across so many categories,” says Bertozzi. “Another note: the beta is open to applicants from around the world but will, at first, only be in English and only support US dollars. We plan to add many more languages and currencies very soon.”

    Etsy also announced a new delivery process for digital goods. For sellers offering downloadable items, the company has made “improvements” to the way they can manage and deliver these items.

    “Previously, sellers emailed the attachment to the buyer after every sale,” explains Etsy’s Jaclyn Fu. “Now, sellers can upload the file to the listing just once, and that’s it! After the payment successfully processes, the buyer will receive an automatic email notification letting them know the file is ready on the Downloads page.”

    Etsy community members sold $101.7 million worth of goods (after refunds and cancellations) in March, 9.7% higher than February’s $92.7 million. 4,534,479 items were sold during the month. See the latest weather report for more stats for the month.

  • Samsung Galaxy S4 Arrives On T-Mobile April 24, Retails For $150

    Samsung Galaxy S4 Arrives On T-Mobile April 24, Retails For $150

    AT&T was the first to announce pre-order details for the Galaxy S4 so it was assumed that it would also be the first carrier to get Samsung’s new flagship device. That’s actually not the case as T-Mobile will be getting it next Wednesday – almost a week before AT&T gets the device.

    T-Mobile announced today that the Galaxy S4 will be available on its network starting April 24. The phone will cost $150 upfront, and the rest will be paid off in monthly installments of $20 over the next two years. The $20 installments will be added onto your monthly bill, and will be removed once the phone is paid off.

    “Samsung has a proven track record of delivering the ‘Next Big Thing’ in smartphone innovation,” said John Legere, president and CEO, T-Mobile USA. “By combining our bold, Un-carrier moves — no restrictions, no limits and an unbeatable value — with Samsung’s leading-edge technology, you’re going to get the most from your Samsung Galaxy S 4 at T-Mobile —hands down.”

    The main advantage of going with T-Mobile over other carriers is its unlimited 4G data plan. For $70 a month, subscribers will get unlimited talk, text and 4G data. T-Mobile’s Galaxy S4 will have an LTE chip in it so it will be able to jump onto T-Mobile’s LTE network once the carrier brings it to more markets.

    Unfortunately, unlike every other carrier, T-Mobile will not be offering pre-orders on the Galaxy S4. If you want one, you’re going to have to order it online as soon as it becomes available on April 24. If you prefer to buy your phones at physical retail locations, the S4 won’t be available until May 1.

  • HBO GO without the Cable Subscription? HBO CEO Says Maybe, Possibly, Down the Road. Maybe.

    HBO GO without the Cable Subscription? HBO CEO Says Maybe, Possibly, Down the Road. Maybe.

    There is a lot of awesome content coming from HBO. The venerable premium cable network has produced some of the best shows to ever grace the small screen (The Wire, The Sopranos), and currently produces some of the most interesting (Game of Thrones, Boardwalk Empire) and popular (True Blood) programs around.

    Because the content is so good, people are willing to do just about anything to get to it. For some, that means paying over $100 a month for a cable subscription + HBO. For others who have cut the cord on cable, that usually means pirating it.

    But that’s not because they’re cheap, or because they think that the content isn’t worth paying for. Quite the contrary, actually. At least one online campaign showed that people are more than willing to pay HBO, directly, for their content.

    And until now, HBO has shut down any and all hopes of their content moving out from under the cable subscription umbrella. Until now.

    HBO CEO Richard Plepler gave cordcutters a glimmer of hope this week. Speaking at the Game of Thrones season 3 premiere, Plepler said that offering HBO content (via HBO GO, the company’s on demand content hub) without requiring a cable subscription could maybe possibly might just may be an option, down the line, maybe.

    “Right now we have the right model,” Plepler told Reuters. “Maybe HBO GO, with our broadband partners, could evolve.”

    He went on to say that they would “have to make the math work.”

    Not exactly a signal that HBO is planning to give up on the lucrative cable subscription-based model that has served them so well for so many years, but it sounds like Plepler is aware that the times may be a’ changing. Although abandoning the traditional distirubtion system system may be a shaky business call, Plepler seems to understand that there is an availability issue with HBO content:

    “Doesn’t mean we are not mindful that the problem exists,” he said.

    If HBO decided to go this route with an internet-packaged HBO deal, they know that they would have plenty of support for the venture. Last summer, a viral campaign saw hundreds of thousands of people take to Twitter and shout, “Take my money, HBO!”

    The campaign was simple. Give us a standalone HBO GO service, free of cable requirements, and take our money. As in we’re ready to pay you for your content if you will just let us. People tweeted the price that they might pay for such a service, and the average was an impressive $12+ per month – a couple bucks more than Netflix. Some people even said that they would pay well over $20 per month for a cordless HBO GO service.

    The effort received over 163,000 supporters in just two days.

    Shortly after, HBO dismissed the whole thing with a single tweet, basically saying that their model was the right model for now. Thanks, but no thanks.

    But these few words from HBO’s CEO gives cordcutters a little bit of hope that HBO could break at least a few of their ties with cable. It’s not like it would be a first for the company. Last year they launched HBO Nordic, a standalone streaming service like HBO GO, in Sweden, Finland, Norway, and Denmark. It’s available for under 10 euros per month.

    Hope. Let me tell you something my friend. Hope is a dangerous thing. Hope can drive a man insane.

  • Amazon Is Working With Record Labels On Subscription-Based Music Service [Rumor]

    Amazon Is Working With Record Labels On Subscription-Based Music Service [Rumor]

    Despite earlier attempts to bring streaming music to the masses, Spotify really nailed the concept when it launched in 2008. Now its the service every company in the business of selling music is trying to copy, including Amazon.

    The Verge reports that Amazon is currently in talks with record labels on setting up its own subscription-based music service. If successful, Amazon could prove a formidable rival to incumbents like Spotify as it really has an established business in selling physical and digital music.

    Of course, it probably will be a while before we see anything from this. Those privy to the meetings say that Amazon and the record labels are now just beginning to talk, and that said talks are “very informal” at this point in time.

    Amazon is just the latest company said to be in talks with record labels about setting up a subscription music service. Analysts have predicted that Apple will get into the streaming Internet radio business this year to take on services like Pandora. Google is also reportedly getting into the streaming music scene with YouTube.

    Out of all the rumored players, Amazon seems the most well suited for the music streaming business. It already has an established cloud infrastructure with Amazon Cloud Player. There’s also the rumored existence of a Kindle phone and $99 Kindle Fire HD; both of which could provide the perfect platform to launch a streaming service on.

    As always, the above is nothing but a rumor for now. That being said, it’s completely within the realm of possibility so don’t be surprised if Amazon announces something similar to Spotify this year.

  • Google’s RSS Subscription Chrome Extension Is Back, Sans Google Reader Support

    Google’s RSS Subscription Chrome Extension Is Back, Sans Google Reader Support

    Shortly after Google announced that they would be killing off Google Reader, angering a significant amount of users, they dealt another blow to RSS by yanking the Google RSS Subscription Chrome extension. More anger ensued. Why must you destroy everything that we love, Google?

    Well, here’s a bit of good news: The extension is back.

    Finnur Thorarinsson, the author of the extension, announced its return on a Chromium issues thread. According to him, it was removed by mistake.

    The extension has been updated to remove Google Reader and iGoogle from the lists of supported feed readers, “to prevent [new users] from getting hooked on Reader and then be disappointed in a few months time,” according to the extension’s author.

    Here’s what he had to say:

    I’m the author of the RSS Subscription Extension (from Google) and I wanted to provide a quick update on what Peter said.

    My RSS extension was removed by mistake but it is now up again on the webstore:

    It was not _tied_ to Google Reader, per se, since you choose which feed reader to use — but I’ve now removed the Google Reader option for new users to prevent them from getting hooked on Reader and then be disappointed in a few months time.

    Also, please note that even though clones of my extension exist in the webstore, some of them were copied a long time ago and have not been updated since. They might therefore be vulnerable to security issues and can not really be recommended without making sure they’ve kept up with the times.

    The RSS Subscription extension allows users to quickly add RSS and Atom feeds to a variety of feed readers. That functionality still remains, minus the ability to subscribe via Google Reader.

    So, Google, burned down the house and spared one small possession from the fire. For what it’s worth, Thorarinsson himself is just as upset about the whole Google Reader shutdown as the rest of us.

    “I’m an avid user of Google Reader and am pretty unhappy about the Reader situation as well,” he says.

    [h/t CNET]

  • Adobe Phasing Out Boxed Retail Copies Of CS6

    Adobe Phasing Out Boxed Retail Copies Of CS6

    Do you still purchases boxed retail versions of software? If so, you might want to grab a boxed copy of Adobe’s Creative Suite 6 as the company is beginning to phase out its retail offerings.

    Adobe told multiple outlets today that it will be discontinuing its retail offerings of Creative Suite 6 and Acrobat. An Adobe spokesperson provided the the following comment to TechHive:

    “As Adobe continues to focus on delivering world-class innovation through Creative Cloud and digital fulfillment, we will be phasing out shrink-wrapped, boxed versions of Creative Suite and Acrobat products. Electronic downloads for Creative Suite and Acrobat products will continue to be available—as they are today—from both Adobe.com, as well as reseller and retail partners. We are in the process of notifying our channel partners and customers, as plans solidify in each region.”

    Since last year, Adobe has put considerable marketing muscle behind its Creative Cloud subscription service. For $49.99 a month, subscribers get access to all the software included in CS6 alongside development tools for games and Web pages.

    Phasing out its retail presence makes perfect sense as Adobe pushes for more subscribers. After all, a few hundred thousand subscribers paying $50 a month for years to come will make them far more money than single time purchases of CS6.

    So, what if you really want to own a boxed retail copy of CS6? TechHive says that stores will carry boxed copies of CS6 until April 30. After that, you’ll either have to buy digital copies or sign up for a Creative Cloud subscription.

  • Minecraft Xbox 360 Edition Makes Its Way To Retail In April

    Minecraft Xbox 360 Edition Makes Its Way To Retail In April

    Minecraft Xbox 360 Edition has already proven to be the best selling Xbox Live Arcade title ever released on the platform. Now the indie hit has a chance to become the best selling retail Xbox 360 game of the year.

    Microsoft announced today that it will be launching a retail version of Minecraft Xbox 360 Edition in stores on April 30. The new retail version of the game will include all the latest features of its digital counterpart including the ninth title update that’s on the way.

    The retail version will be identical to the digital version in every way. That means retail players will be able to play online with those who only own a digital copy. As expected, the retail copy will also receive all future updates.

    There’s no word on if the retail copy will come with any special features or extras, but it would be a great opportunity on Microsoft’s part to encourage those who already own the digital version to buy the retail version. Minecraft diehards will probably pick up the retail release anyway, but a little something extra – like a download code for the Minecraft documentary – definitely wouldn’t hurt.

    Minecraft Xbox 360 Edition will launch in the U.S. on April 30 for $20. Gamers in Australia, Hong Kong, India, New Zealand, Singapore and Taiwan will be getting it in early June.

  • Spotify Adds 1 Million Paid Subscriptions in Just 3 Months

    Spotify Adds 1 Million Paid Subscriptions in Just 3 Months

    Spotify has tacked on a million paid users just a little over three months.

    That’s the word from SXSW, where the company has announced that they can now boast 6 million paid subscribers. Back in December, Spotify announced that their paid subscriber total had hit 5 million. In July 2012, it was 4 million. And back in January of 2012, it was 3 million. If you do your math, you’ll notice that it took roughly a year for Spotify to turn 3 million in 5 million, but only 3 months to turn 5 million into 6 million.

    Long story short: Spotify is growing faster than it ever has.

    It’s not just paid subscriptions that are growing – total users are also up 4 million in the past three months, from 20 to 24 million. Of course, total users counts are great and all, but the big questions is how many unpaid users Spotify can turn into paid users with subscription-only features like mobile play, offline radio, and no advertisements.

    Spotify has made a few non-subscriber based headlines in the past few months. Back in December, they made a splash when they acquired the catalog of Metallica, longtime foes of services like Napster. In the past three months, Spotify has landed on a bunch of new devices like TiVo, Roku, and Windows Phone 8.

    And they just expanded the beta for their new web player in the U.K. The browser app should be making its way to the U.S. soon.

  • Netflix Tattoo Scores Guy Free 1-Year Subscription

    Netflix Tattoo Scores Guy Free 1-Year Subscription

    How much would it take for you to get a Netflix tattoo? Would you do it for a free year’s worth of the service?

    If you think you love Netflix and their selection of streaming offerings, you don’t. Unless you’ve permanently inked the name “Netflix” on your body, you don’t really love Netflix. Yes, I know you watched all of House of Cards in three days. You still don’t really love Netflix.

    Twitter user @TheRealMyron does. He loves Netflix a lot. TheRealMyron got a Netflix tattoo, and for his troubles received a free year of Netflix.

    In case you were wondering, Netflix didn’t ask this guy to get a tatto in order to receive a free year. He just did it to show his love, tweeted the photo @Netflix and they responded with the offer. Social media done right? I guess?

    Netflix’s streaming-only plan is $7.99 a month – so that means that TheRealMyron was awarded a prize worth $95.88 for his troubles. If Netflix decided to throw in unlimited DVDs too, that’s $191.76. And if they bumped him up to the Blu-Ray option, it means that his tattoo netted him $215.76

    Worth it!

  • Google Shuts Down Notion That It Will Open Retail Stores, Source Of Rumor Sticks To Story

    Google Shuts Down Notion That It Will Open Retail Stores, Source Of Rumor Sticks To Story

    At Mobile World Congress, Andy Rubin, SVP of Mobile and Digital Content at Google (and co-founder of Android), shut down rumors that Google will be opening up retail stores.

    Last week, 9to5Google put out a report indicating that Google would be opening its own retail stores by the end of the year. The report cited “an extremely reliable source”. According to Rubin, however, Google has no need to open stores, despite other indications that Google Glass will be widely available by the year’s end.

    Ina Fried at All Things D shares some words from him:

    “They don’t have to go in the store and feel it anymore,” Rubin said, during a roundtable with reporters on Tuesday. Plus, he said, the Google hardware effort is still in its infancy. “For Nexus, I don’t think the program is far enough along to think about the necessity of having these things in a retail store.”

    As for whether Google as a whole might nonetheless be considering retail stores. “Google has no plans and we have nothing to announce,” he said.

    Okay, the “nothing to announce” part is pretty commonplace regardless of whether or not the company actually has something in the works. The “Google has no plans” part seems a little bit more definitive.

    Still, it doesn’t sound like the idea is totally ruled out for the future. Perhaps 9to5Google’s “extremely reliable source” is just off on the timeframe.

    Despite Rubin’s comments, Google clearly has a number of items it could easily get into a retail store, and the company already has a presence in some Best Buys and PCWorld/Dixon’s stores.

    Plus, as Google Retail Industry Director Todd Pollak recently said, “The lines between online and offline shopping experiences are blurring.”

    Update: 9to5Google’s Seth Weintraub now has this to say:

    I reported last week that Google had plans to open retail stores within the year, which according to a quick ping of that same source, is still on. When asked about Rubin’s comments, I was told that Rubin wasn’t being forthcoming or AllThingsD misquoted him.

    It should be noted that the retail program is being born (we’re told) out of Google’s (X) labs under Sergey Brin and not out of the Android group and the two groups aren’t always in full cooperation

    The rumor continues…

  • Google Subscription Music Service Coming In Third Quarter [Report]

    Google Subscription Music Service Coming In Third Quarter [Report]

    Rumors persisted throughout this past weekend that Google is working on a subscription music service that would take on Spotify, Pandora and the like.

    Bloomberg has since put out a report, citing two people with knowledge of the situation, that Google does indeed plan to do so, that negotiations are under way with major record labels, that the service will work with both Android and non-Android devices, and that the “worldwide service” is targeted for the third quarter. The report also says Google is discussing the renewal of deals for the use of songs in consumer-made YouTube videos.

    Obviously Google doesn’t comment on “rumor and speculation”.

    Such a service from Google would complement Google Play Music and YouTube quite nicely, basically eliminating the need for users to use Spotify or Pandora, provided that they prefer the Google experience. Of course, that will not necessarily be the case. People seem to be liking these services just fine, and Spotify’s heavy integration with Facebook seems to be a hit on the social level. Google still can’t really compete there (unless of course, they do tap into Facebook’s Open Graph).

    Either way, such an offering will give people more reason to turn to Google for their music needs, and it will be interesting to see how the competition shakes out. Those deals with labels will obviously be of vital importance.

    Meanwhile, it has been said that Spotify will try to negotiate with labels to make its free streaming service available on mobile devices, which would make the service all the more attractive of an option for users who aren’t willing to pay.

    Google’s Google Music offering recently got music matching capabilities.

  • Barnes & Noble Founder Plans To Buy Retail Operation

    Barnes & Noble Founder Plans To Buy Retail Operation

    Barnes & Noble looked like it was on its way back to relevancy after a number of quarters of profitability thanks to its Nook tablets. That all ended last year as the company began posting losses, and it looked like its Nook business was starting to come up short against Amazon. Now the company may be breaking apart its various businesses in a bid to save the company.

    Leonard Riggio, founder of Barnes & Noble, Chairman of the Board and largest shareholder, announced this morning that he plans to buy the brick and mortar retail business of the book store. There’s nothing set in stone just yet, but it would be the second time in the past few months that an ailing business was bought by its founder. The first, of course, being the acquisition of Dell by its founder Michael Dell for $24.4 billion.

    Riggio’s plan is to only buy the company’s retail business. The Nook business was spun off last year so where does this plan leave that? According to a report from The New York Times, the company is looking into winding down its Nook business.

    It doesn’t mean that the Nook brand, which was spun off from the retail business last year, will be dead. It only means that Barnes & Noble might stop making its own hardware in favor of licensing its own Nook software to other manufacturers. In essence, we’d see tablets and eReaders from other manufacturers running the Nook software. The company would also presumably focus on its software presence on other platforms like Windows 8, iOS and Android.

    If Riggio is successful in his bid to buy the retail operation, it could give Microsoft an opening to purchase the Nook operation. Nook is already closely tied to Windows 8 after Microsoft pumped $300 million into the business last year. Nook is already the best eReader app on Windows 8, and further cultivation at the hands of Microsoft could turn it into a worthy competitor to Apple’s iBooks and Amazon’s Kindle.

    All of this is purely speculation for now, and the Barnes & Noble board may not even approve Riggio’s bid to buy the company’s retail operation. Still, it does look like the company will at least be winding down its Nook hardware operations. A focus on its digital business could just be what Nook needs to become profitable again.

    [h/t: The Verge]

  • Demand Media To Split Into Two Public Companies, Earnings Released

    Demand Media announced today that its board of directors has authorized a plan for the company to explore separating into two separate public companies – one for its media business and one for its domain business.

    CEO Richard Rosenblatt said, “Both businesses have grown to become leaders in their respective markets, and we now want to provide additional operational and strategic flexibility to drive sustainable growth. We believe a separation will position each business to better pursue its specific strategic priorities and vision, as well as improve transparency for investors and enable the capital markets to better assess each company’s value, performance and potential.”

    “We intend to appropriately capitalize both companies to pursue their distinct growth opportunities, such as the upcoming launch of new generic Top Level Domains that is a transformative event for our domain services business, as well as further diversifying our content offerings in our media business,” he added.

    Demand Media expects a potential transaction to come within the next nine to twelve months. In the meantime, the company will work with outside advisers to develop plans for the the board’s further consideration and approval.

    The company also just released its Q4 and Fiscal 2012 financial results.

    On the earnings call, Rosenblatt said the company intends to increase its investment in its people, its content production, and its gTLD initiative. On the content side of things, it will evolve its content production arm (Demand Studios), and expects to double its investment in content this year, further develop its algorithm, add additional quality improvements (like those that helped it achieve recovery from the Panda update), and expand production capabilities.

    The company will also increase distribution by expanding its partner network, which doubled revenues in 2012. Rosenblatt says he expects its revenues to double again this year.

    They’re also planning on launching eHow in two more countries this year (after launching in Germany in Q4).

    Rosenblatt says they’ll diversify into new content models, and will expand beyond their core ad-driven model with new paid opportunities including subscription video and elearning content.

    On the gTLD front, he noted that Amazon and Google were the biggest players, and that their participation will lead to a bigger market for everyone.

    Demand Media ranked as a top 20 US web property throughout last year, and was ranked at number 13 in January, according to comScore. The company reached over 125 million unique visitors worldwide in January, and eHow (which was once famously hit by Google’s Panda update) was ranked number 12 in the U.S. with 62 million unique visitors in January.

    “We finished the year on a high note, posting record fourth quarter results and completing our fifth consecutive year of record revenue and Adjusted EBITDA,” said Rosenblatt. “We improved content quality and diversified our distribution channels by successfully revamping our content platform in 2012, and are now prepared to significantly increase our content investments in 2013. In addition, we became a leader in the generic Top Level Domain opportunity, due to substantial investments we made in 2012. We plan to increase this investment ahead of the expected launch later this year.”

    “As a result of these two different growth opportunities, we also announced today that our Board of Directors has authorized a plan to explore the separation of our business into two independent publicly-traded companies via a tax-free spin-off,” he added. “If approved, the separation will facilitate better operational and strategic flexibility, enabling each business to focus on its distinct priorities and growth opportunities.”

    Here’s the earnings release in its entirety:

    SANTA MONICA, Calif.–(BUSINESS WIRE)–Feb. 19, 2013– Demand Media, Inc. (NYSE: DMD), a leading digital media and domain services company, today reported financial results for the fourth quarter and fiscal year ended December 31, 2012.

    “We finished the year on a high note, posting record fourth quarter results and completing our fifth consecutive year of record revenue and Adjusted EBITDA,” saidRichard Rosenblatt, Chairman and CEO of Demand Media. “We improved content quality and diversified our distribution channels by successfully revamping our content platform in 2012, and are now prepared to significantly increase our content investments in 2013. In addition, we became a leader in the generic Top Level Domain opportunity, due to substantial investments we made in 2012. We plan to increase this investment ahead of the expected launch later this year.”

    Rosenblatt added: “As a result of these two different growth opportunities, we also announced today that our Board of Directors has authorized a plan to explore the separation of our business into two independent publicly-traded companies via a tax-free spin-off. If approved, the separation will facilitate better operational and strategic flexibility, enabling each business to focus on its distinct priorities and growth opportunities.”

    Financial Summary
    In millions, except per share amounts
    Three months ended Year ended
    December 31, December 31,
    2011 2012 Change 2011 2012 Change
    Total Revenue $ 84.4 $ 103.1 22% $ 324.9 $ 380.6 17%
    Content & Media Revenue ex-TAC(1) $ 49.9 $ 62.3 25% $ 193.0 $ 227.0 18%
    Registrar Revenue 31.4 34.5 10% 119.4 134.2 12%
    Total Revenue ex-TAC(1) $ 81.3 $ 96.8 19% $ 312.4 $ 361.1 16%
    Income (loss) from Operations $ (4.8 ) $ 6.1 NA $ (13.1 ) $ 8.7 NA
    Adjusted EBITDA(1) $ 23.7 $ 29.4 24% $ 86.0 $ 103.4 20%
    Net income (loss) $ (6.4 ) $ 4.7 NA $ (18.5 ) $ 6.2 NA
    Adjusted net income(1) $ 6.8 $ 10.8 60% $ 21.9 $ 34.3 57%
    EPS – diluted $ (0.08 ) $ 0.05 NA $ (0.27 ) $ 0.07 NA
    Adjusted EPS(1) $ 0.08 $ 0.12 50% $ 0.25 $ 0.39 56%
    Cash Flow from Operations $ 27.2 $ 26.0 (4)% $ 85.3 $ 91.0 7%
    Free Cash Flow(1)(2) $ 18.3 $ 17.1 (7)% $ 19.5 $ 62.3 219%
     
    (1) These non-GAAP financial measures are described below and reconciled to their comparable GAAP measures in the accompanying tables. Effective Q1 2012, the Company began reporting Adjusted EBITDA instead of Adjusted OIBDA.
    Reconciliations for both measures are available on the investor relations section of the Company’s website.
    (2) In 2012, the Company invested $18.2 million in generic Top Level Domain (“gTLD”) applications, which did not impact its recurring Free Cash Flow metric.

    Q4 2012 Financial Summary:

    • Content & Media revenue ex-TAC grew 25% year-over-year, driven by 24% page view growth on the Company’s owned & operated properties as well as 37% growth in network RPMs ex-TAC, reflecting higher revenue from network content partners.
    • Registrar revenue grew 10% year-over-year, driven by an increase in the number of domains on our platform, due primarily to growth from new partners.
    • Adjusted EBITDA increased 24% year-over-year, resulting in 110 basis points of margin expansion to 30.3% of Revenue ex-TAC. This improvement was driven by the growth in higher margin Content & Media revenue and operating leverage.

    “In 2012 we generated over $60 million of free cash flow, which more than funded our acquisition of Name.com and the repurchase of nearly $9 million of our common stock,” said Demand Media’s CFO Mel Tang. “We plan to continue reinvesting our strong cash flows into long-term growth opportunities, such as our gTLD initiative as well as growing and diversifying our content offerings.”

    Business Highlights:

    • Demand Media ranked as a top 20 US web property throughout 2012, and ranked #13 in January 2013.(1)
    • Demand Media reached more than 125 million unique visitors worldwide in January 2013.(1)
    • eHow.com ranked as the #12 website in the US, with 62.0 million unique users inJanuary 2013.(1)
    • LIVESTRONG.COM/eHow Health ranked as the #3 Health property in the US inJanuary 2013.(1)
    • Cracked ranked as the #1 Humor property in the US in January 2013.(1)
    • On December 31, 2012, Demand Media acquired retail registrar Name.com, expanding its registrar platform as it prepares for the historic release of new gTLDs.
    • During the fourth quarter of 2012, Demand Media repurchased approximately 572,000 shares of common stock for $4.9 million under its Board-authorized $50.0 million share repurchase program. To date, the Company has repurchased approximately 4.0 million shares of common stock for $30.8 million.
    • On February 19, 2013, the Company announced that its Board of Directors has authorized a plan to explore the separation of its business into two distinct publicly traded companies.

    (1) Source: comScore.

    Operating Metrics:
    Three months ended Year ended
    December 31, December 31,
    % %
    2011 2012 Change 2011 2012 Change
    Content & Media Metrics:
    Owned and operated
    Page views(1) (in millions) 2,696 3,354 24 % 10,378 13,192 27 %
    RPM(2) $ 14.53 $ 14.55 $ 15.14 $ 13.53 (11 )%
    Network of customer websites
    Page views(1)(in millions) 4,935 4,530 (8 )% 17,436 18,989 9 %
    RPM(2) $ 2.81 $ 4.38 56 % $ 2.77 $ 3.58 29 %
    RPM ex-TAC(3) $ 2.18 $ 2.98 37 % $ 2.06 $ 2.55 24 %
    Registrar Metrics:
    End of Period # of Domains(4) (in millions) 12.7 13.7 8 % 12.7 13.7 8 %
    Average Revenue per Domain(5) $ 10.08 $ 10.09 $ 10.08 $ 10.19 1 %
    ____________________
    (1) Page views represent the total number of web pages viewed across (a) our owned and operated websites and/or (b) our network of customer websites, to the extent that the viewed customer web pages host the Company’s monetization, social media and/or content services.
    (2) RPM is defined as Content & Media revenue per one thousand page views.
    (3) RPM ex-TAC is defined as Content & Media Revenue ex-TAC per one thousand page views.
    (4) Domain is defined as an individual domain name paid for by a third-party customer where the domain name is managed through our Registrar service offering.
    (5) Average revenue per domain is calculated by dividing Registrar revenue for a period by the average number of domains registered in that period. Average revenue per domain for partial year periods is annualized.
    Beginning July 1, 2011, the number of net new domains has been adjusted to include only new registered domains added to our platform for which the Company has recognized revenue. Excluding the impact of this change, average revenue per domain during the three months and year ended December 31, 2012 would have increased 1% and decreased 4%, respectively, compared to the corresponding prior-year periods.

    Q4 2012 Operating Metrics:

    • Owned & Operated page views increased 24% year-over-year, driven primarily by strong traffic growth on eHow.com and LIVESTRONG.COM. Owned & Operated RPMs were relatively flat year-over-year.
    • Network page views decreased 8% year-over-year to 4.5 billion, due primarily to lower traffic from our social media partners. Network RPM ex-TAC increased 37% year-over-year, reflecting higher revenue from our growing network of content partners, primarily YouTube.
    • End of period domains increased 8% year-over-year to 13.7 million, driven primarily by the addition of higher volume customers and continued growth from existing resellers, with average revenue per domain flat year-over-year.

    Business Outlook

    The following forward-looking information includes certain projections made by management as of the date of this press release. The Company does not intend to revise or update this information, except as required by law, and may not provide this type of information in the future. Due to a variety of factors, actual results may differ significantly from those projected. The factors that may affect results include, without limitation, the factors referenced later in this announcement under the caption “Cautionary Information Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.” These and other factors are discussed in more detail in the Company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

    Excluding $5 to $10 million of estimated expenses in 2013 associated with the formation of the Company’s gTLD initiative, the Company’s guidance for the first quarter endingMarch 31, 2013 and fiscal year ending December 31, 2013 is as follows:

    First Quarter 2013

    • Revenue in the range of $100.0 – $102.0 million
    • Revenue ex-TAC in the range of $94.0 – $96.0 million
    • Adjusted EBITDA in the range of $23.5 – $25.5 million
    • Adjusted EPS in the range of $0.07 – $0.08 per share
    • Weighted average diluted shares 89.0 – 90.0 million

    Full Year 2013

    • Revenue in the range of $435.0 – $443.0 million
    • Revenue ex-TAC in the range of $410.0 – $418.0 million
    • Adjusted EBITDA in the range of $110.0 – $115.0 million
    • Adjusted EPS in the range of $0.39 – $0.43 per share
    • Weighted average diluted shares 89.0 – 91.0 million

    Conference Call and Webcast Information

    Demand Media will host a corresponding conference call and live webcast at 5:00 p.m. Eastern time today. To access the conference call, dial 877.565.1268 (for domestic participants) or 937.999.3108 (for international participants). The conference ID is 90583374. To participate on the live call, analysts should dial-in at least 10 minutes prior to the commencement of the call. A live webcast also will be available on the Investor Relations section of the Company’s corporate website at http://ir.demandmedia.com and via replay beginning approximately two hours after the completion of the call.

    About Non-GAAP Financial Measures

    To supplement our consolidated financial statements, which are prepared and presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”), we use certain non-GAAP financial measures described below. The presentation of this additional financial information is not intended to be considered in isolation or as a substitute for, or superior to, the financial information prepared and presented in accordance with GAAP. For more information on these non-GAAP financial measures, please see the tables captioned “Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measures to Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Operations” included at the end of this release.

    Effective Q1 2012, the Company began reporting Adjusted EBITDA instead of Adjusted OIBDA. While the dollar value of each measure is the same, a comparison of the historical reconciliation of both measures is provided in our supplemental financial schedules posted on the investor relations section of our corporate website athttp://ir.demandmedia.com. The non-GAAP financial measures presented in this release are the primary measures used by the Company’s management and board of directors to understand and evaluate its financial performance and operating trends, including period to period comparisons, to prepare and approve its annual budget and to develop short and long term operational plans. Additionally, Adjusted EBITDA is the primary measure used by the compensation committee of the Company’s board of directors to establish the funding targets for and fund its annual bonus pool for the Company’s employees and executives. We believe our presented non-GAAP financial measures are useful to investors both because (1) they allow for greater transparency with respect to key metrics used by management in its financial and operational decision-making and (2) management frequently uses them in its discussions with investors, commercial bankers, securities analysts and other users of its financial statements.

    Revenue ex-TAC is defined by the Company as GAAP revenue less traffic acquisition costs (TAC). TAC comprises the portion of Content & Media GAAP revenue shared with the Company’s network customers. Management believes that Revenue ex-TAC is a meaningful measure of operating performance because it is frequently used for internal managerial purposes and helps facilitate a more complete period-to-period understanding of factors and trends affecting the Company’s underlying revenue performance of its Content & Media service offering.

    Adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (Adjusted EBITDA) is defined by the Company as net income (loss) before income tax expense, other income (expense), interest expense (income), depreciation, amortization, stock-based compensation, as well as the financial impact of acquisition and realignment costs, the formation expenses directly related to its gTLD initiative, expenditures related to the separation of Demand Media into two distinct publicly traded companies, and any gains or losses on certain asset sales or dispositions. Acquisition and realignment costs include such items, when applicable, as (1) non-cash GAAP purchase accounting adjustments for certain deferred revenue and costs, (2) legal, accounting and other professional fees directly attributable to acquisition activity, and (3) employee severance payments attributable to acquisition or corporate realignment activities. Management does not consider these expenses to be indicative of the Company’s ongoing operating results or future outlook.

    Management believes that these non-GAAP financial measures reflect the Company’s business in a manner that allows for meaningful period to period comparisons and analysis of trends. In particular, the exclusion of certain expenses in calculating Adjusted EBITDA can provide a useful measure for period to period comparisons of the Company’s underlying recurring revenue and operating costs, which is focused more closely on the current costs necessary to utilize previously acquired long-lived assets. In addition, management believes that it can be useful to exclude certain non-cash charges because the amount of such expenses is the result of long-term investment decisions in previous periods rather than day-to-day operating decisions. For example, due to the long-lived nature of a majority of its media content, the revenue generated by the Company’s media content assets in a given period bears little relationship to the amount of its investment in media content in that same period. Accordingly, management believes that content acquisition costs represent a discretionary long-term capital investment decision undertaken at a point in time. This investment decision is clearly distinguishable from other ongoing business activities, and its discretionary nature and long-term impact differentiate it from specific period transactions, decisions regarding day-to-day operations, and activities that would have an immediate impact on operating or financial performance if materially changed, deferred or terminated.

    Adjusted Earnings Per Share is defined by the Company as Adjusted Net Income divided by the weighted average number of shares outstanding. Adjusted Net Income is defined by the Company as net income (loss) before the effect of stock-based compensation, amortization of intangible assets acquired via business combinations, accelerated amortization of intangible assets removed from service, acquisition and realignment costs, the formation expenses directly related to its gTLD initiative, expenditures related to the separation of Demand Media into two distinct publicly traded companies, and any gains or losses on certain asset sales or dispositions, and is calculated using the application of a normalized effective tax rate. Acquisition and realignment costs include such items, when applicable, as (1) non-cash GAAP purchase accounting adjustments for certain deferred revenue and costs, (2) legal, accounting and other professional fees directly attributable to acquisition activity, and (3) employee severance payments attributable to acquisition or corporate realignment activities. Management does not consider these expenses to be indicative of the Company’s ongoing operating results or future outlook.

    Management believes that Adjusted Net Income and Adjusted Earnings Per Share provide investors with additional useful information to measure the Company’s underlying financial performance, particularly from period to period, because these measures are exclusive of certain non-cash expenses not directly related to the operation of its ongoing business (such as amortization of intangible assets acquired via business combinations, as well as certain other non-cash expenses such as purchase accounting adjustments and stock-based compensation) and include a normalized effective tax rate based on the Company’s statutory tax rate.

    Discretionary Free Cash Flow is defined by the Company as net cash provided by operating activities excluding cash outflows from acquisition and realignment activities, the formation expenses directly related to its gTLD initiative, and expenditures related to the separation of Demand Media into two distinct publicly traded companies, less capital expenditures to acquire property and equipment. Free Cash Flow is defined by the Company as Discretionary Free Cash Flow less investments in intangible assets and is not impacted by gTLD application payments, which were $18.2 million in 2012. Management believes that Discretionary Free Cash Flow and Free Cash Flow provide investors with additional useful information to measure operating liquidity because they reflect the Company’s underlying cash flows from recurring operating activities after investing in capital assets and intangible assets. These measures are used by management, and may also be useful for investors, to assess the Company’s ability to generate cash flow for a variety of strategic opportunities, including reinvestment in the business, pursuing new business opportunities, potential acquisitions, payment of dividends and share repurchases.

    The use of these non-GAAP financial measures has certain limitations because they do not reflect all items of income and expense, or cash flows that affect the Company’s operations. An additional limitation of these non-GAAP financial measures is that they do not have standardized meanings, and therefore other companies may use the same or similarly named measures but exclude different items or use different computations. Management compensates for these limitations by reconciling these non-GAAP financial measures to their most comparable GAAP financial measures within its financial press releases. Non-GAAP financial measures should be considered in addition to, not as a substitute for, financial measures prepared in accordance with GAAP. Further, these non-GAAP financial measures may differ from the non-GAAP financial information used by other companies, including peer companies, and therefore comparability may be limited. We encourage investors and others to review our financial information in its entirety and not rely on a single financial measure. The accompanying tables have more details on the GAAP financial measures and the related reconciliations.

    About Demand Media

    Demand Media, Inc. (NYSE: DMD) is a leading digital media and domain services company that informs and entertains one of the internet’s largest audiences, helps advertisers find innovative ways to engage with their customers and enables publishers, individuals and businesses to expand their online presence. Headquartered in Santa Monica, CA, Demand Media has offices in North America, South America and Europe. For more information about Demand Media, please visit www.demandmedia.com.

    Cautionary Information Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

    This press release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, as amended. These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties regarding the Company’s future financial performance, and are based on current expectations, estimates and projections about our industry, financial condition, operating performance and results of operations, including certain assumptions related thereto. Statements containing words such as guidance, may, believe, anticipate, expect, intend, plan, project, projections, business outlook, and estimate or similar expressions constitute forward-looking statements. Actual results may differ materially from the results predicted, and reported results should not be considered an indication of future performance. Potential risks and uncertainties include, among others: our ability to complete a separation of our business as announced herein and unanticipated developments that may delay or negatively impact such a transaction; the possibility that we may decide not to proceed with the separation of our business as announced herein if we determine that alternative opportunities are more favorable to our stockholders; the possibility that we decide to separate our business in a manner different from that disclosed herein; the impact and possible disruption to our operations from pursuing such a separation transaction announced herein; our ability to retain key personnel; the high costs we will likely incur in connection with such a transaction, which we would not be able to recoup if such a transaction is not consummated; the expectation that the transaction announced herein will be tax-free; revenue and growth expectations for the two independent companies following the separation of our business; the ability of each business to operate as an independent entity upon completion of such a transaction; changes in the methodologies of internet search engines, including ongoing algorithmic changes made by Google as well as possible future changes, and the impact such changes may have on page view growth and driving search related traffic to our owned and operated websites and the websites of our network customers; changes in our content creation and distribution platform, including the possible repurposing of content to alternate distribution channels, reduced investments in intangible assets or the sale or removal of content; our ability to successfully launch, produce and monetize new content formats; the inherent challenges of estimating the overall impact on page views and search driven traffic to our owned and operated websites based on the data available to us as internet search engines continue to make adjustments to their search algorithms; our ability to compete with new or existing competitors; our ability to maintain or increase our advertising revenue; our ability to continue to drive and grow traffic to our owned and operated websites and the websites of our network customers; our ability to effectively monetize our portfolio of content; our dependence on material agreements with a specific business partner for a significant portion of our revenue; future internal rates of return on content investment and our decision to invest in different types of content in the future, including premium video and other formats of text content; our ability to attract and retain freelance creative professionals; changes in our level of investment in media content intangibles; the effects of changes or shifts in internet marketing expenditures, including from text to video content as well as from desktop to mobile content; the effects of shifting consumption of media content from desktop to mobile; the effects of seasonality on traffic to our owned and operated websites and the websites of our network customers; our ability to continue to add partners to our registrar platform on competitive terms; our ability to successfully pursue and implement our gTLD initiative; changes in stock-based compensation; changes in amortization or depreciation expense due to a variety of factors; potential write downs, reserves against or impairment of assets including receivables, goodwill, intangibles (including media content) or other assets; changes in tax laws, our business or other factors that would impact anticipated tax benefits or expenses; our ability to successfully identify, consummate and integrate acquisitions; our ability to retain key customers and key personnel; risks associated with litigation; the impact of governmental regulation; and the effects of discontinuing or discontinued business operations. From time to time, we may consider acquisitions or divestitures that, if consummated, could be material. Any forward-looking statements regarding financial metrics are based upon the assumption that no such acquisition or divestiture is consummated during the relevant periods. If an acquisition or divestiture were consummated, actual results could differ materially from any forward-looking statements. More information about potential risk factors that could affect our operating and financial results are contained in our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year endingDecember 31, 2011 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission(http://www.sec.gov) on February 24, 2012, and as such risk factors may be updated in our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including, without limitation, information under the captions Risk Factors and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

    Furthermore, as discussed above, the Company does not intend to revise or update the information set forth in this press release, except as required by law, and may not provide this type of information in the future.

    Demand Media, Inc. and Subsidiaries
    Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
    (In thousands, except per share amounts)
    Three months ended Year ended
    December 31, December 31,
    2011 2012 2011 2012
    Revenue $ 84,415 $ 103,142 $ 324,866 $ 380,578
    Operating expenses
    Service costs (exclusive of amortization of intangible assets shown separately below) (1) (2) 40,198 48,865 155,830 181,018
    Sales and marketing (1) (2) 9,325 12,823 37,394 46,501
    Product development (1) (2) 9,462 9,719 38,146 40,708
    General and administrative (1) (2) 13,803 16,171 59,451 63,025
    Amortization of intangible assets 16,393 9,460 47,174 40,676
    Total operating expenses 89,181 97,038 337,995 371,928
    Income (loss) from operations (4,766 ) 6,104 (13,129 ) 8,650
    Other income (expense)
    Interest income 4 8 56 42
    Interest expense (151 ) (157 ) (861 ) (622 )
    Other income (expense), net (75 ) (34 ) (413 ) (111 )
    Total other expense (222 ) (183 ) (1,218 ) (691 )
    Income (loss) before income taxes (4,988 ) 5,921 (14,347 ) 7,959
    Income tax expense (1,438 ) (1,172 ) (4,177 ) (1,783 )
    Net (loss) income $ (6,426 ) $ 4,749 $ (18,524 ) $ 6,176
     
    (1) Stock-based compensation expense included in the line items above:
    Service costs $ 711 $ 679 $ 2,052 $ 2,820
    Sales and marketing 1,416 1,597 4,857 6,118
    Product development 1,364 1,283 5,013 6,452
    General and administrative 3,263 3,823 16,934 15,978
    Total stock-based compensation expense $ 6,754 $ 7,382 $ 28,856 $ 31,368
    (2) Depreciation included in the line items above:
    Service costs $ 3,770 $ 3,663 $ 16,075 $ 14,452
    Sales and marketing 127 108 423 453
    Product development 308 238 1,466 1,025
    General and administrative 861 1,025 2,994 3,728
    Total depreciation $ 5,066 $ 5,034 $ 20,958 $ 19,658
    Income (loss) per common share:
    Net income (loss) $ (6,426 ) $ 4,749 $ (18,524 ) $ 6,176
    Cumulative preferred stock dividends (3) (2,477 )
    Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders $ (6,426 ) $ 4,749 $ (21,001 ) $ 6,176
    Net income (loss) per share – basic (0.08 ) 0.06 (0.27 ) 0.07
    Net income (loss) per share – diluted (0.08 ) 0.05 (0.27 ) 0.07
    Weighted average number of shares – basic 83,592 86,140 78,646 84,553
    Weighted average number of shares – diluted 83,592 88,444 78,646 87,237
    ____________________
    (3) As a result of the Company’s initial public offering which was completed on January 31, 2011, all shares of the Company’s preferred stock were converted to common stock.
    Demand Media, Inc. and Subsidiaries
    Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
    (In thousands)
    December 31, December 31,
    2011 2012
    Current assets
    Cash and cash equivalents $ 86,035 $ 102,933
    Accounts receivable, net 32,665 45,517
    Prepaid expenses and other current assets 8,656 6,041
    Deferred registration costs 50,636 57,718
    Total current assets 177,992 212,209
    Property and equipment, net 32,626 35,467
    Intangible assets, net 111,304 91,061
    Goodwill 256,060 267,034
    Deferred registration costs 9,555 11,320
    Other long-term assets 2,566 20,906
    Total assets $ 590,103 $ 637,997
    Liabilities, Convertible Preferred Stock and Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)
    Current liabilities
    Accounts payable $ 10,046 $ 10,471
    Accrued expenses and other current liabilities 33,932 40,489
    Deferred tax liabilities 18,288 18,892
    Deferred revenue 71,109 75,142
    Total current liabilities 133,375 144,994
    Deferred revenue 14,802 15,965
    Other liabilities 1,660 4,847
    Total liabilities 149,837 165,806
    Stockholders’ equity (deficit)
    Common stock and additional paid-in capital 528,042 562,703
    Treasury stock (17,064 ) (25,932 )
    Accumulated other comprehensive income 59 15
    Accumulated deficit (70,771 ) (64,595 )
    Total stockholders’ equity (deficit) 440,266 472,191
    Total liabilities, convertible preferred stock and stockholders’ equity (deficit) $ 590,103 $ 637,997
    Demand Media, Inc. and Subsidiaries
    Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
    (In thousands)
    Three months ended Year ended
    December 31, December 31,
    2011 2012 2011 2012
    Cash flows from operating activities:
    Net income (loss) $ (6,426 ) $ 4,749 $ (18,524 ) $ 6,176
    Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities:
    Depreciation and amortization 21,459 14,494 68,132 60,334
    Stock-based compensation 6,741 7,382 28,730 31,368
    Other 1,128 1,134 3,491 1,717
    Net change in operating assets and liabilities, net of effect of acquisitions 4,322 (1,722 ) 3,520 (8,612 )
    Net cash provided by operating activities 27,224 26,037 85,349 90,983
    Cash flows from investing activities:
    Purchases of property and equipment (4,222 ) (5,283 ) (18,246 ) (17,708 )
    Purchases of intangibles (5,294 ) (4,647 ) (49,283 ) (13,237 )
    Payments for gTLD applications (18,202 )
    Cash paid for acquisitions (38 ) (16,200 ) (31,010 ) (17,480 )
    Other (855 )
    Net cash used in investing activities (9,554 ) (26,130 ) (98,539 ) (67,482 )
    Cash flows from financing activities:
    Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net (145 ) 78,480
    Repurchases of common stock (13,336 ) (4,913 ) (17,064 ) (8,869 )
    Proceeds from exercises of stock options and contributions to ESPP 3,242 1,451 7,599 12,467
    Net taxes paid on RSUs vesting and options exercised (364 ) (6,151 ) (725 ) (9,496 )
    Other (168 ) (258 ) (1,354 ) (668 )
    Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities (10,771 ) (9,871 ) 66,936 (6,566 )
    Effect of foreign currency on cash and cash equivalents (18 ) (19 ) (49 ) (37 )
    Change in cash and cash equivalents 6,881 (9,983 ) 53,697 16,898
    Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period 79,154 112,916 32,338 86,035
    Cash and cash equivalents, end of period $ 86,035 $ 102,933 $ 86,035 $ 102,933
    Demand Media, Inc. and Subsidiaries
    Reconciliations of Non-GAAP Measures to Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Operations
    (In thousands, except per share amounts)
    Three months ended Year ended
    December 31, December 31,
    2011 2012 2011 2012
    Revenue ex-TAC:
    Content & Media revenue $ 53,032 $ 68,633 $ 205,450 $ 246,399
    Less: traffic acquisition costs (TAC) (3,111 ) (6,332 ) (12,495 ) (19,441 )
    Content & Media Revenue ex-TAC 49,921 62,301 192,955 226,958
    Registrar revenue 31,383 34,509 119,416 134,179
    Total Revenue ex-TAC $ 81,304 $ 96,810 $ 312,371 $ 361,137
    Adjusted EBITDA(1):
    Net income (loss) $ (6,426 ) $ 4,749 $ (18,524 ) $ 6,176
    Income tax expense 1,438 1,172 4,177 1,783
    Interest and other expense, net 222 183 1,218 691
    Depreciation and amortization(2) 21,459 14,494 68,132 60,334
    Stock-based compensation 6,754 7,382 28,856 31,368
    Acquisition and realignment costs(3) 271 314 2,099 446
    gTLD expense(4) 1,061 2,650
    Adjusted EBITDA $ 23,718 $ 29,355 $ 85,958 $ 103,448
    Discretionary and Total Free Cash Flow:
    Net cash provided by operating activities $ 27,224 $ 26,037 $ 85,349 $ 90,983
    Purchases of property and equipment (4,222 ) (5,283 ) (18,246 ) (17,708 )
    Acquisition and realignment cash flows 602 25 1,670 25
    gTLD expense cash flows(4) 974 2,198
    Discretionary Free Cash Flow 23,604 21,753 68,773 75,498
    Purchases of intangible assets (5,294 ) (4,647 ) (49,283 ) (13,237 )
    Free Cash Flow(4)(5) $ 18,310 $ 17,106 $ 19,490 $ 62,261
    Adjusted Net Income:
    GAAP net income (loss) $ (6,426 ) $ 4,749 $ (18,524 ) $ 6,176
    (a) Stock-based compensation 6,754 7,382 28,856 31,368
    (b) Amortization of intangible assets – M&A 2,974 2,572 12,773 10,904
    (c) Content intangible assets removed from service(2) 5,898 237 5,898 2,055
    (d) Acquisition and realignment costs(3) 271 314 2,099 446
    (e) gTLD expense(4) 1,061 2,650
    (f) Income tax effect of items (a) – (e) & application of 38% statutory tax rate to pre-tax income (2,707 ) (5,473 ) (9,229 ) (19,262 )
    Adjusted Net Income $ 6,764 $ 10,842 $ 21,873 $ 34,337
    Non-GAAP Adjusted Net Income per share – diluted $ 0.08 $ 0.12 $ 0.25 $ 0.39
    Shares used to calculate non-GAAP Adjusted Net Income per share – diluted(6) 86,758 88,444 88,541 87,237
    ___________________
    (1) Effective Q1 2012, the Company began reporting Adjusted EBITDA instead of Adjusted OIBDA. While the dollar value of each measure does not differ, a comparison of the historical reconciliation of both measures is provided in our supplemental financial schedules available on the investor relations section of our corporate website.
    (2) In conjunction with its previously announced plans to improve its content creation and distribution platform, the Company elected to remove certain content assets from service, resulting in accelerated amortization expense of $5.9 million in the fourth quarter of 2011, and $1.8 million and $0.2 million in the first and fourth quarter of 2012, respectively.
    (3) Acquisition and realignment costs include such items, when applicable, as (1) non-cash GAAP purchase accounting adjustments for certain deferred revenue and costs, (2) legal, accounting and other professional fees directly attributable to acquisition activity, and (3) employee severance payments attributable to acquisition or corporate realignment activities. Management does not consider these costs to be indicative of the Company’s core operating results.
    (4) Comprises formation expenses directly related to the Company’s gTLD initiative that did not generate associated revenue in 2012.
    (5) In 2012, the Company invested $18.2 million in gTLD applications, which did not impact its recurring Free Cash Flow metric.
    (6) Shares used to calculate non-GAAP Adjusted Net Income per share – diluted include the weighted average common stock for the periods presented and all dilutive common stock equivalents at each period. Amounts have been adjusted in 2011 to reflect the revised capital structure following the Company’s initial public offering which was completed on January 31, 2011, whereby the Company issued 5,175 shares of common stock and converted certain warrants and all of its previously outstanding convertible preferred stock into 62,155 shares of common stock as if those transactions were consummated on January 1, 2011.
    Demand Media, Inc. and Subsidiaries
    Unaudited GAAP Revenue, by Revenue Source
    (In thousands)
    Three months ended Year ended
    December 31, December 31,
    2011 2012 2011 2012
    Content & Media:
    Owned and operated websites $ 39,172 $ 48,796 $ 157,089 $ 178,511
    Network of customer websites 13,860 19,837 48,361 67,888
    Total Revenue – Content & Media 53,032 68,633 205,450 246,399
    Registrar 31,383 34,509 119,416 134,179
    Total Revenue $ 84,415 $ 103,142 $ 324,866 $ 380,578
    Three months ended Year ended
    December 31, December 31,
    2011 2012 2011 2012
    Content & Media:
    Owned and operated websites 46 % 47 % 48 % 47 %
    Network of customer websites 16 % 19 % 15 % 18 %
    Total Revenue – Content & Media 63 % 67 % 63 % 65 %
    Registrar 37 % 33 % 37 % 35 %
    Total Revenue 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 %

     

    Source: Demand Media, Inc.

  • Google Retail Stores On The Way?

    Google Retail Stores On The Way?

    Google is planning on opening up retail stores in major metropolitan areas by the end of the year, according to a report from 9to5Google.

    Seth Weintraub, who notes that Google already has a retail presence in a number of Best Buys and PCWorld/Dixon’s stores, reports (citing a “reliable source”) that Google is in the process of building stand alone retail stores, and that these would be places where Google could not only sell its Nexus devices (and possibly apparel), but push its Chrome operating system, and get Google Glass into consumers’ hands.

    Google Glass, while it may seem like a novelty, could actually prove to be a very important product for Google, and if this is one of Google’s main motivating factors for opening a chain or retail stores, that shows how important Google really does consider it.

    Google was recently granted a patent, which seems to indicate the company is looking to make your actual life searchable, and Glass could play a significant role in it being able to do so. While we’re looking a ways out in the future, so may contact lenses based on similar functionality. If Google is also able to refine Glass from the fashion standpoint, one can easily imagine more merchandise to fill a store.

    Google is also said to be thinking about marketing a smart watch, so that’s yet another potential device for Google to place on the shelves.

    And who knows what else Google may have on the horizon?

    It will be interesting to see what kind of presence (if any) Google gives motorola devices in these stores, assuming they actually do open. Google indicated that it would not give Motorola special treatment among device manufacturers, when it announced the acquisition.

    As Google gets further into the hardware business, a retail store is a no brainer, particularly in light of what is already available from competitors. Apple has over 400 retail stores in 14 countries.

    We’ve reached out to Google for comment, and will update accordingly.

    Would you shop at a Google store?

  • What Google’s Enhanced Campaigns Mean For Small Businesses

    It’s been a huge week of news in the online maketing industry, particularly when it comes to Google. For one, Yahoo announced that it has signed a contextual ad agreement with Google, which will see Google display ads appear on various Yahoo properties, and even some co-branded sites. Before that, Google announced the launch of enhanced campaigns for AdWords, which is a huge evolutionary step (for better or for worse) for Google’s ad product, and by default, that means it has huge ramifications for online advertising.

    What impact do you see Google’s changes having on your online marketing efforts? Let us know in the comments.

    WordStream was one of three companies outside of Google that worked with the company on the enhanced campaigns project over the last few months. Founder/CTO Larry Kim reached out to WebProNews with some perspective about what the offering brings to the table for businesses.

    “Enhanced Campaigns represent the biggest single change to the basic structure of AdWords campaigns in the past 10 years,” he says. “The new campaign structure will greatly simplify targeting and bidding for different devices and locations. It’s a win-win for both Google and advertisers.”

    One key feature is bid adjustments to help advertisers manage bids across devices, locations, time of day, etc. from a single campaign. “A breakfast cafe wants to reach people nearby searching for ‘coffee’ or ‘breakfast’ on a smartphone,” explains Google SVP of engineering, Sridhar Ramaswamy, giving an example. “Using bid adjustments, with three simple entries, they can bid 25% higher for people searching a half-mile away, 20% lower for searches after 11am, and 50% higher for searches on smartphones. These bid adjustments can apply to all ads and all keywords in one single campaign.”

    Enhanced campaigns will show ads across devices with the right ad text, sitelink, app or extension, without advertisers having to edit each campaign for every combination of devices, location and time of day. “A national retailer with both physical locations and a website can show ads with click-to-call and location extensions for people searching on their smartphones, while showing an ad for their e-commerce website to people searching on a PC — all within a single campaign,” explains Ramaswamy.

    The enhanced campaigns also come with advanced reports to measure new conversion types. For example, you can count calls and app downloads as conversions in your AdWords reports.

    “Mobile search has been growing incredibly quickly – it’s actually expected to outpace desktop search by next year,” says Kim. “But Google has had a big problem monetizing that traffic. For one, setting up mobile campaigns was too complicated. Making matters worse, mobile CPC’s tended to be much lower. Enhanced Campaigns are a strategic effort to solve both those problems.”

    “Enhanced Campaigns are great news for advertisers at small and medium-sized businesses,” he adds. “Previously, mobile campaign management was too complicated and time-consuming for all but the biggest-budget, most sophisticated advertisers. Now even small companies can take advantage of the exciting opportunities in mobile search.”

    “With Enhanced Campaigns, you not only have more bidding options, but your ads are actually much smarter,” he explains. “Google will be able to choose and adjust your ads and settings based on user context, so mobile users will get an optimized ad experience, without you having to build out separate campaigns.”

    “There has always been a big gap between the cost per click (CPC) on mobile versus desktop. For obvious reasons, Google wants to close that gap, and these changes will help it accomplish that. I believe that mobile CPCs will be similar to desktop CPCs by the time campaigns are auto-upgraded later this year.”

    Adobe’s Bill Mungovan explores how Google’s changes will impact advertisers in terms of tablets being considered mobile devices.

    “A 2012 Google study showed that the most pop­u­lar places to use tablets are, in order, on the couch, in bed, in the home, at the table, and in the kitchen,” he writes. “Indeed, the first out-of-home loca­tion to make the list was the car, which occurred only 3% of the time. So tablets appear to be closer to lap­tops than mobile phones, at least in terms of con­sumer usage.”

    WIth Google’s offering, tablet users will be lumped in with desktop users, while smartphone users will be targeted through the enhanced campaign functionality. “Adver­tis­ers can no longer cre­ate sep­a­rate cam­paigns for desk­top, smart­phone and tablet tar­get­ing, but will instead be able to add a mobile mod­i­fier at the cam­paign level to mod­ify bids on smart­phone traf­fic,” says Mungovan. “Google has made a clear state­ment to its adver­tis­ers: tablets aren’t mobile. But they’ve taken it a step fur­ther and effec­tively said that tablets are desktops.”

    “Cur­rently, CPCs are lower for tablets given that com­pe­ti­tion for tablet traf­fic is still rel­a­tively low (but increas­ing),” he says. “By lump­ing the higher per­form­ing tablet traf­fic in with desk­top traf­fic, rev­enue per search (RPS) will increase for Google as CPCs increase on the com­bined desk­top and tablet traf­fic. This, pre­sum­ably, will address Google’s mobile mon­e­ti­za­tion gap as an increas­ing share of searches is com­ing from tablets and smartphones.”

    “The down­side for adver­tis­ers in the long run is they may see lower over­all ROI as these CPCs creep up,” he adds.

    As far as Kim is concerned, small businesses should be big winners with Google’s changes.

    “Small businesses in particular have never been able to fully take advantage of the potential ROI in mobile search,” says Kim. “Not only was the setup and maintenance process prohibitively complex, but conversion tracking was much more challenging, and the reporting costs were being offloaded onto the advertiser. All of these factors acted as disincentives. With Enhanced Campaigns, Google is making it much simpler and more attractive for even small businesses to get ROI from mobile advertising.”

    You can read more of Kim’s analysis here.

    Apparently some advertisers aren’t thrilled with the direction Google is taking, expressing concerns with a loss of control.

    Neil Sorenson, the head of PPC at ZAGG.com, says enhanced campaigns “aren’t really an upgrade or improvement’”. He writes, “What can we expect? Some advertisers might welcome Enhanced Campaigns with outstretched arms. It is entirely possible that these advertisers will see continued success using the new campaigns. That’s fantastic for them! Search marketers who have noted varying conversion rates across devices and taken steps to reduce or eliminate unprofitable traffic sources are likely worried. At this point it is for good reason.”

    Business Insider points to some others in the industry who are expressing concern. For example, an anonymous search marketing professional said of the “smart pricing” behind enhanced campaigns, “They’re stealing money from advertisers because they can. It’s the most lowbrow thing Google has ever done. The damage this is going to do to advertisers is big. They’re going to sell a story to the public and be the Wizard of Oz behind the curtain.”

    iProspect says, “Advertisers who do not have a smartphone strategy will be forced to come up with one, or leverage the bid multiplier workaround (setting the bid multiplier to negative 100 percent) to opt out of smartphones. Advertisers who don’t take the time to make this adjustment, or are unaware of it, will start serving ads on smartphones unintentionally. This is an example of Google deciding what is best for the advertiser – however, in this case they’re not just opting you into a setting by default, they’re removing the option of opting out or using a workaround.”

    Enhanced campaigns will roll out to advertisers as an option over the coming weeks. All campaigns will be upgraded in mid-2013.

    What do you think about Google’s changes? Game changer? Good or bad for advertisers? Share your thoughts in the comments.

  • Ouya Launches At Retailers Nationwide In June

    Ouya Launches At Retailers Nationwide In June

    Ouya – the little game console that could – is almost upon us. Those who helped make it the most successful gaming Kickstarter ever only have one more month before its delivered to them. What about those who didn’t preorder one last year though? They’ll have to wait a bit longer.

    Speaking to the Wall Street Journal, Ouya CEO Julie Uhrman said that the Ouya would be hitting retail in June of this year. The company has struck deals with various retailers, like Target, Amazon, GameStop and Best Buy, to carry the mini-console. Before that though, the company will be shipping out Kickstarter backer units in March and early preorders in April.

    GameStop and Amazon already have preorder pages up for the Ouya with the console retailing for $99.99. The base console comes with one console and a controller. Extra controllers will retail for $49.99 each.

    As for game support, Uhrman told the WSJ that about 200 titles are being prepared for Ouya at the moment. The titles range from indie efforts to games from big name studios. An example of each would be Minecraft from Mojang and Final Fantasy III from Square Enix.

    Ouya has the games and right price, but can it compete with the new consoles coming from Sony and Microsoft this year? Uhrman says that it’s not their intention to compete with the other consoles, but instead “carve out own niche.”

    Retailers seem to have faith in Ouya, and it’s Kickstarter campaign still impresses. It still remains to be seen, however, how consumers will respond once it officially launches. I find it hard to imagine people playing sloppy controller-based ports of smartphone titles on their televisions, but wholly original content may just Ouya the kickstart it needs to succeed where others have failed.

  • TwitchTV to Offer Expensive Ad-Free Subscription

    TwitchTV to Offer Expensive Ad-Free Subscription

    One of the most frustrating experiences while watching an eSports event online is dropping a stream and having to reload and sit through another commercial while the action continues. TwitchTV, the most popular video game streaming service, has heard customer complaints and is now offering a solution.

    The new “Twitch Turbo” subscription service will allow users to remove all ads from the Twitch website. That means no pre-roll ads, no display ads, and no companion ads.

    Unfortunately, the service is priced absurdly high at $8.99 per month. A subscription to Netflix Instant Watch streaming is only $8 per month. With a year-long PlayStation Plus subscription, for less than $5 per month gamers could be playing games themselves instead of watching other people game on a stream. Not to mention free ad-blocking software can do the same job as Twitch Turbo for free.

    The Turbo service doesn’t only offer ad-free Twitch, however. Subscribers will also get an “Exclusive Turbo Badge” to show off on the site, as well as custom set of new emoticons and exclusive chat colors. Also, subscribers will get priority when interacting with customer support.

    TwitchTV is quickly becoming the online destination for streaming games and eSports. Last year the company raised $15 million in venture capital during a funding round. At the time Twitch CEO Emmett Shear claimed that the website was seeing 20 million unique visitors per month.