WebProNews

Category: CFOTrends

  • Andreessen Leaves eBay’s Board of Directors

    Andreessen Leaves eBay’s Board of Directors

    Marc Andreessen announced he is resigning from eBay’s board of directors as the company prepares to split into two separate entities: eBay and PayPal.

    Andreessen has been on the board for six years. He joined in September of 2008. He said that now is the right time to step down with the split-up on the way.

    eBay President and CEO John Donahoe said: “Marc has been an extraordinary board member, and we greatly appreciate the leadership, insight and expertise he has provided over the past six years. He has provided invaluable support to me, the board and the entire company.”

    “It’s been an absolute privilege to serve with John, Pierre, and team, and I could not be more proud of what we’ve accomplished,” Andreessen said. “I have complete confidence in John and the board to lead eBay and PayPal through the process of embarking on independent paths in 2015. I wish eBay, and both of its successor companies, all the best, and look forward to following the future of eBay and PayPal closely in the years to come.”

    The board decided that splitting up eBay and PayPal would best position both units to “capitalize on their respective growth opportunities in the rapidly changing global commerce and payments landscape.”

    Donahoe and CFO Bob Swan will lead the separation of each business with oversight from the board. eBay’s new CEO will become Devin Wenig, who is currently president of eBay Marketplaces. Dan Schulman is PayPal’s president, and is in charge of finding a CEO for the standalone company.

    Image via Wikimedia Commons

  • Is Google’s Core Business Actually In Trouble?

    Is Google’s Core Business Actually In Trouble?

    Google released its earnings report for the third quarter on Thursday, and while the company managed to post a revenue increase of 20% year-over-year, analysts are concerned by slowing growth in its core ad business, which is how it makes the bulk of its money.

    “We continue to be excited about the growth in our advertising and emerging businesses,” said CFO Patrick Pichette.

    Others aren’t so excited. Paid clicks were up 17% year-over-year, but only up 2% quarter-over-quarter, and the previous quarter saw 25% year-over-year growth, which makes that 17% look worse. On top of that, Google has seen twelve straight quarters of ad price decline.

    Does Google actually has call for concern here, or do you believe that this is not an indication of significant trouble for Google’s future? Share your thoughts in the comments.

    Google’s average cost-per-click decreased 2% year-over-year and remained consistent from the second quarter. As Tim Peterson at Ad Age notes, the big question heading into Google’s reports for a while now, is whether the company has gotten advertisers to pay more for ads, and “as of Thursday, the answer was: Still no.”

    “This continues a years-long trend driven by more people being exposed to Google’s ads on their smartphones and tablets and advertisers’ unwillingness to pay as much for those smaller-screen ads as they do for desktop ones,” he writes. “Google has tried to reverse this pattern, but been so far has been unable to.”

    Google doesn’t break out mobile ad numbers separately from desktop, which would obviously give people a better picture of what’s actually happening. The fact that they don’t do this would seem to suggest that mobile isn’t doing as well as the company would like, but Google tried to paint a more optimistic picture during its conference call.

    Pichette told analysts, ” I mean, look, it’s very clear that mobile is still a big part of our growth. And we’re very pleased about it. I mean, it’s — but when we talk about mobile, I think there’s a couple things. One is you have to continue to look at both the growth in volume and the growth in pricing. So these are long-term trends that we’re seeing. The CPCs and the clicks, they can fluctuate from quarter-to-quarter. It just happens that we’ve made some changes this quarter that improved the mobile pricing while impacting the lower quality clicks and that’s what you see a bit reflected in our numbers.”

    Interim Chief Business Officer and special advisor to the CEO, Omid Kordestani, later said, “The way we’re focusing this is that users really are using their screens interchangeably simultaneously throughout the day and that we really are not at this point doing this like-by-like comparisons or comment on it because we think it’s still early and we’re really focused on just again delivering the results. And it took many years, for example, for the desktop ecosystem to develop the right ad formats and really take advantage of the platform. So I think we just need to continue innovating here, experimenting here to get it right.”

    Seeking Alpha has a full transcript of the call here.

    The New York Times has a report out about Google’s woes suggesting that Google’s search business is “showing signs of age.”

    In response to that, Stephen Arnold, a tech and financial analyst with over 30 years of experience, writes, “The innovations are mostly wrapper code and tweaks that generate more money for Google. Keep in mind that the vaunted business model is pretty much what GoTo/Overture/Yahoo had and did not leverage. We have, therefore, a bit of Clever, some voting, and the PageRank method disclosed in a patent held by Stanford University. The innovation engine at Google has been to graft GoTo/Overture/Yahoo with a bit of Oingo (Applied Semantics) and ignite the race to be number one on a page of Google results. Ta da. A business model that works. Keep in mind that Google is, as Steve Ballmer said, before he bought a basketball team, a “one trick pony.” A monoculture of money with an aging DNA.”

    As his article implies, there’s also the distinct possibility that Google actually knows what it’s doing, and that analysts’ blabbings are basically noise from those that don’t really see the big picture.

    Interestingly, CEO Larry Page hasn’t had anything to say about any of this. He’s been staying away from the quarterly conference calls for a while now, but he didn’t even contribute a statement to the earnings report this time.

    What do you think? Is there real concern here? Is Google’s core business really in trouble? Share your thoughts in the comments.

    Image via YouTube

  • Google Earnings Released, Revenue Up 20%

    Google Earnings Released, Revenue Up 20%

    Google just released its earnings for the third quarter with revenue up 20% year-over-year at 16.52 billion.

    CFO Patrick Pichette said, “Google had another strong performance this quarter, with revenue up 20% year on year, at $16.5 billion. We continue to be excited about the growth in our advertising and emerging businesses.”

    Not a word from CEO Larry Page this time around. He’s been sitting out from the calls for a while, but apparently he’s not even contributing quotes for the earnings reports anymore.

    Paid clicks were up 17% year-over-year, and up 2% quarter-over-quarter. Average cost-per-click decreased 2% year-over-year and remained consistent from the second quarter.

    Here’s the release in its entirety:

    MOUNTAIN VIEW, Calif. – October 16, 2014 – Google Inc. (NASDAQ: GOOG, GOOGL) today announced financial results for the quarter ended September 30, 2014.

    “Google had another strong performance this quarter, with revenue up 20% year on year, at $16.5 billion,” said Patrick Pichette, CFO of Google.  “We continue to be excited about the growth in our advertising and emerging businesses.”

    Q3 Financial Summary

    Google Inc. reported consolidated revenues of $16.52 billion for the quarter ended September 30, 2014, an increase of 20% compared to the third quarter of 2013. Google Inc. reports advertising revenues, consistent with GAAP, on a gross basis without deducting traffic acquisition costs (TAC). In the third quarter of 2014, TAC totaled $3.35 billion, or 23% of advertising revenues.

    Operating income, operating margin, net income, and earnings per share (EPS) are reported on a GAAP and non-GAAP basis. The non-GAAP measures, as well as free cash flow, an alternative non-GAAP measure of liquidity, are described below and are reconciled to the corresponding GAAP measures at the end of this release.

    • GAAP operating income in the third quarter of 2014 was $3.72 billion, or 23% of revenues. This compares to GAAP operating income of $3.76 billion, or 27% of revenues, in the third quarter of 2013. Non-GAAP operating income in the third quarter of 2014 was $5.36 billion, or 32% of revenues. This compares to non-GAAP operating income of $4.62 billion, or 34% of revenues, in the third quarter of 2013.
    • GAAP net income (including net loss from discontinued operations) in the third quarter of 2014 was $2.81 billion, compared to $2.97 billion in the third quarter of 2013. Non-GAAP net income in the third quarter of 2014 was $4.37 billion, compared to $3.82 billion in the third quarter of 2013.
    • GAAP EPS (including impact from net loss from discontinued operations) in the third quarter of 2014 was $4.09 on 688 million diluted shares outstanding, compared to $4.38 in the third quarter of 2013 on 678 million diluted shares outstanding. Non-GAAP EPS in the third quarter of 2014 was $6.35 compared to $5.63 in the third quarter of 2013.
    • Non-GAAP operating income and non-GAAP operating margin exclude stock-based compensation (SBC) expense. Non-GAAP net income and non-GAAP EPS exclude SBC expense, net of the related tax benefit, as well as net income (loss) from discontinued operations. In the third quarter of 2014, non-GAAP operating income, non-GAAP operating margin, non-GAAP net income, and non-GAAP EPS also excluded an impairment charge of $378 million related to a patent licensing royalty asset acquired in connection with the purchase of Motorola.
    • In the third quarter of 2014, the expense related to SBC from our continuing operations and the related tax benefits were $1,255 million and $258 million compared to $856 million and $200 million in the third quarter of 2013. In addition, net loss from discontinued operations in the third quarter of 2014 was $185 million, compared to $193 million in the third quarter of 2013.

    On January 29, 2014, we entered into an agreement with Lenovo Group Limited providing for the disposition of the Motorola Mobile business. Financial results of Motorola Mobile are presented as “Net income (loss) from discontinued operations” on the Consolidated Statements of Income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2014; and assets and liabilities of Motorola Mobile to be disposed of are presented as “Assets held for sale” and “Liabilities held for sale”, respectively, on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of September 30, 2014.

    On April 2, 2014, we issued shares of Class C capital stock as a dividend to our stockholders. Except for the number of authorized shares and par value, all references to share and per share amounts have been retroactively restated for all prior periods shown to reflect the stock split, which was effected in the form of a stock dividend.

    Q3 Financial Highlights

    Revenues and other information – Google Inc. revenues for the quarter ended September 30, 2014 were $16.52 billion, representing a 20% increase over third quarter of 2013 revenues of $13.75 billion.

    • Sites Revenues – Our sites generated revenues of $11.25 billion, or 68% of total revenues, in the third quarter of 2014. This represents a 20% increase over third quarter of 2013 sites revenues of $9.38 billion.
    • Network Revenues – Our partner sites generated revenues of $3.43 billion, or 21% of total revenues, in the third quarter of 2014. This represents a 9% increase over third quarter of 2013 network revenues of $3.15 billion.
    • Other Revenues – Other revenues were $1.84 billion, or 11% of total revenues, in the third quarter of 2014. This represents a 50% increase over third quarter of 2013 other revenues of $1.23 billion.

    International Revenues – Our revenues from outside of the United States totaled $9.55 billion, representing 58% of total revenues in the third quarter of 2014, compared to 58% in the second quarter of 2014 and 56% in the third quarter of 2013.

    • Our revenues from the United Kingdom totaled $1.63 billion, representing 10% of total revenues in the third quarter of 2014, compared to 10% in the third quarter of 2013.

    Foreign Exchange Impact on Revenues – Excluding gains related to our foreign exchange risk management program, had foreign exchange rates remained constant from the second quarter of 2014 through the third quarter of 2014, our revenues in the third quarter of 2014 would have been $66 million higher. Excluding gains related to our foreign exchange risk management program, had foreign exchange rates remained constant from the third quarter of 2013 through the third quarter of 2014, our revenues in the third quarter of 2014 would have been $106 million lower.

    • In the third quarter of 2014, we recognized a benefit of $10 million to revenues through our foreign exchange risk management program, compared to $22 million in the third quarter of 2013.

    Reconciliations of our non-GAAP international revenues excluding the impact of foreign exchange and hedging to GAAP international revenues are included at the end of this release.

    Paid Clicks – Aggregate paid clicks, which include clicks related to ads served on Google sites and the sites of our Network members, increased approximately 17% over the third quarter of 2013 and increased approximately 2% over the second quarter of 2014. Sites paid clicks, which include clicks related to ads we serve on Google owned and operated properties across different geographies and form factors including search, YouTube engagement ads like TrueView, and other owned and operated properties like Maps and Finance, increased approximately 24% over the third quarter of 2013 and increased approximately 4% over the second quarter of 2014. Network paid clicks, which include clicks related to ads served on non-Google properties participating in our AdSense for Search, AdSense for Content, and AdMob businesses, increased approximately 2% over the third quarter of 2013 and decreased approximately 4% over the second quarter of 2014.

    Cost-Per-Click – Average cost-per-click, which includes clicks related to ads served on Google sites and the sites of our Network members, decreased approximately 2% over the third quarter of 2013 and remained constant from the second quarter of 2014. Cost-per-click for Google sites decreased approximately 4% over the third quarter of 2013 and decreased approximately 1% over the second quarter of 2014. Network cost-per-click decreased approximately 4% over the third quarter of 2013 and increased approximately 2% over the second quarter of 2014.

    TAC – Traffic acquisition costs, the portion of revenues shared with Google’s partners, increased to $3.35 billion in the third quarter of 2014, compared to $2.97 billion in the third quarter of 2013. TAC as a percentage of advertising revenues was 23% in the third quarter of 2014, compared to 24% in the third quarter of 2013.

    The majority of TAC is related to amounts ultimately paid to our Network members, which totaled $2.42 billion in the third quarter of 2014. TAC also includes amounts ultimately paid to certain distribution partners and others who direct traffic to our website, which totaled $927 million in the third quarter of 2014.

    Other Cost of Revenues – Other cost of revenues, which is comprised primarily of data centers operational expenses, hardware inventory costs, amortization and impairment of acquisition-related intangible assets, and content acquisition costs, increased to $3.35 billion, or 20% of revenues, in the third quarter of 2014, compared to $2.44 billion, or 18% of revenues, in the third quarter of 2013.

    Operating Expenses – Operating expenses, other than cost of revenues, were $6.10 billion in the third quarter of 2014, or 37% of revenues, compared to $4.58 billion in the third quarter of 2013, or 33% of revenues.

    Depreciation and Loss on Disposal of Property and Equipment, Amortization Expenses, and Impairment of Intangibles and Other Assets – Depreciation and loss on disposal of property and equipment and amortization and impairment of intangibles and other assets were $1.55 billion for the third quarter of 2014, of which $1.52 billion was related to Google, compared to $974 million in the third quarter of 2013. Of the $1.52 billion, $109 million was related to amortization of Motorola intangibles, which Google will retain subsequent to the disposal of Motorola Mobile.

    Stock-Based Compensation (SBC) – In the third quarter of 2014, the total charge related to SBC was $1,255 million compared to $856 million in the third quarter of 2013. We currently estimate SBC charges for grants made to employees prior to September 30, 2014 to be approximately $4.16 billion for 2014. This estimate does not include expenses to be recognized related to employee stock awards that are granted after September 30, 2014.

    Operating Income – GAAP operating income in the third quarter of 2014 was $3.72 billion, or 23% of revenues. This compares to GAAP operating income of $3.76 billion, or 27% of revenues, in the third quarter of 2013. Non-GAAP operating income in the third quarter of 2014 was $5.36 billion, or 32% of revenues. This compares to non-GAAP operating income of $4.62 billion, or 34% of revenues, in the third quarter of 2013.

    Interest and Other Income, Net – Interest and other income, net, was $133 million in the third quarter of 2014, compared to $14 million in the third quarter of 2013.

    Income Taxes – Our effective tax rate was 22% for the third quarter of 2014, which includes the effect of the impairment charge of $378 million (discussed above) that is not deductible for income tax purposes.

    Net Loss from Discontinued Operations – Net loss from discontinued operations in the third quarter of 2014 was $185 million, compared to $193 million in the third quarter of 2013. Net loss from discontinued operations in the third quarter of 2014 included a pre-tax adjustment of $26 million related to the release of the deferral of certain revenue for the Motorola Mobile segment. Had we presented Motorola Mobile as an operating segment, the Motorola Mobile segment revenue for the third quarter of 2014 would have been $1.69 billion, $26 million lower than what was included in net loss from discontinued operations.

    Net Income – GAAP consolidated net income in the third quarter of 2014 was $2.81 billion, compared to $2.97 billion in the third quarter of 2013. Non-GAAP consolidated net income was $4.37 billion in the third quarter of 2014, compared to $3.82 billion in the third quarter of 2013. GAAP EPS in the third quarter of 2014 was $4.09 on 688 million diluted shares outstanding, compared to $4.38 in the third quarter of 2013 on 678 million diluted shares outstanding. Non-GAAP EPS in the third quarter of 2014 was $6.35, compared to $5.63 in the third quarter of 2013.

    Cash Flow and Capital Expenditures – Net cash provided by operating activities in the third quarter of 2014 totaled $5.99 billion, compared to $5.08 billion in the third quarter of 2013. In the third quarter of 2014, capital expenditures were $2.42 billion, the majority of which was for data-center construction, production equipment, and real estate purchases. Free cash flow, an alternative non-GAAP measure of liquidity, is defined as net cash provided by operating activities less capital expenditures. In the third quarter of 2014, free cash flow was $3.58 billion compared to $2.79 billion in the third quarter of 2013.

    We expect to continue to make significant capital expenditures.

    A reconciliation of free cash flow to net cash provided by operating activities, the GAAP measure of liquidity, is included at the end of this release.

    Cash – As of September 30, 2014, cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities were $62.16 billion, which excludes cash classified as held for sale, compared to $58.72 billion as of December 31, 2013.

    Headcount – On a worldwide basis, we employed 55,030 full-time employees (51,564 in Google and 3,466 in Motorola Mobile) as of September 30, 2014, compared to 52,069 full-time employees (48,584 in Google and 3,485 in Motorola Mobile) as of June 30, 2014.

    WEBCAST AND CONFERENCE CALL INFORMATION

    A live audio webcast of Google’s third quarter 2014 earnings release call will be available at http://investor.google.com/webcast.html. The call begins today at 1:30 PM (PT) / 4:30 PM (ET). This press release, the financial tables, as well as other supplemental information including the reconciliations of certain non-GAAP measures to their nearest comparable GAAP measures, are also available on that site.

    We also announce investor information, including news and commentary about our business and financial performance, SEC filings, notices of investor events and our press and earnings releases, on our investor relations website (http://investor.google.com) and our investor relations Google+ page (https://plus.google.com/+GoogleInvestorRelations/posts).

    FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

    This press release contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. These statements include statements regarding our investments in areas of strategic focus, our expected SBC charges, and our plans to make significant capital expenditures. Actual results may differ materially from the results predicted, and reported results should not be considered as an indication of future performance. The potential risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ from the results predicted include, among others, unforeseen changes in our hiring patterns and our need to expend capital to accommodate the growth of the business, as well as those risks and uncertainties included under the captions “Risk Factors” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 and our most recent Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2014 which are on file with the SEC and are available on our investor relations website at investor.google.com and on the SEC website at www.sec.gov. Additional information will also be set forth in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2014.  All information provided in this release and in the attachments is as of October 16, 2014, and we undertake no duty to update this information unless required by law.

    ABOUT NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES

    To supplement our consolidated financial statements, which are prepared and presented in accordance with GAAP, we use the following non-GAAP financial measures: non-GAAP operating income, non-GAAP operating margin, non-GAAP net income, non-GAAP EPS, free cash flow, and non-GAAP international revenues. The presentation of this financial information is not intended to be considered in isolation or as a substitute for, or superior to, the financial information prepared and presented in accordance with GAAP. For more information on these non-GAAP financial measures, please see the tables captioned “Reconciliations of non-GAAP results of operations to the nearest comparable GAAP measures,” “Reconciliation from net cash provided by operating activities to free cash flow,” and “Reconciliation from GAAP international revenues to non-GAAP international revenues” included at the end of this release.

    We use these non-GAAP financial measures for financial and operational decision-making and as a means to evaluate period-to-period comparisons. Our management believes that these non-GAAP financial measures provide meaningful supplemental information regarding our performance and liquidity by excluding certain expenses and expenditures that may not be indicative of our recurring core business operating results, meaning our operating performance excluding not only non-cash charges, such as SBC, but also discrete cash charges that are infrequent in nature. We believe that both management and investors benefit from referring to these non-GAAP financial measures in assessing our performance and when planning, forecasting, and analyzing future periods. These non-GAAP financial measures also facilitate management’s internal comparisons to our historical performance and liquidity as well as comparisons to our competitors’ operating results. We believe these non-GAAP financial measures are useful to investors both because (1) they allow for greater transparency with respect to key metrics used by management in its financial and operational decision-making and (2) they are used by our institutional investors and the analyst community to help them analyze the health of our business.

    Non-GAAP operating income and operating margin. We define non-GAAP operating income as operating income excluding expenses related to SBC, and, as applicable, other special items. Non-GAAP operating margin is defined as non-GAAP operating income divided by revenues. Google considers these non-GAAP financial measures to be useful metrics for management and investors because they exclude the effect of SBC, and as applicable, other special items so that Google’s management and investors can compare Google’s recurring core business operating results over multiple periods. Because of varying available valuation methodologies, subjective assumptions and the variety of award types that companies can use under FASB ASC Topic 718, Google’s management believes that providing a non-GAAP financial measure that excludes SBC allows investors to make meaningful comparisons between Google’s recurring core business operating results and those of other companies, as well as providing Google’s management with an important tool for financial and operational decision making and for evaluating Google’s own recurring core business operating results over different periods of time. There are a number of limitations related to the use of non-GAAP operating income versus operating income calculated in accordance with GAAP. First, non-GAAP operating income excludes some costs, namely, SBC, that are recurring. SBC has been and will continue to be for the foreseeable future a significant recurring expense in Google’s business. Second, SBC is an important part of our employees’ compensation. Third, the components of the costs that we exclude in our calculation of non-GAAP operating income may differ from the components that our peer companies exclude when they report their results of operations. Management compensates for these limitations by providing specific information regarding the GAAP amounts excluded from non-GAAP operating income and evaluating non-GAAP operating income together with operating income calculated in accordance with GAAP.

    Non-GAAP net income and EPS. We define non-GAAP net income as net income excluding expenses related to SBC and, as applicable, other special items less the related tax effects, as well as net income (loss) from discontinued operations. The tax effects of SBC and, as applicable, other special items are calculated using the tax-deductible portion of SBC, and, as applicable, other special items, and applying the entity-specific, U.S. federal and blended state tax rates.  We define non-GAAP EPS as non-GAAP net income divided by the weighted average outstanding shares, on a fully-diluted basis. We consider these non-GAAP financial measures to be useful metrics for management and investors for the same reasons that Google uses non-GAAP operating income and non-GAAP operating margin. However, in order to provide a complete picture of our recurring core business operating results, we exclude from non-GAAP net income and non-GAAP EPS the tax effects associated with SBC and, as applicable, other special items. Without excluding these tax effects, investors would only see the gross effect that excluding these expenses had on our operating results. The same limitations described above regarding Google’s use of non-GAAP operating income and non-GAAP operating margin apply to our use of non-GAAP net income and non-GAAP EPS. Management compensates for these limitations by providing specific information regarding the GAAP amounts excluded from non-GAAP net income and non-GAAP EPS and evaluating non-GAAP net income and non-GAAP EPS together with net income and EPS calculated in accordance with GAAP.

    Free cash flow. We define free cash flow as net cash provided by operating activities less capital expenditures. We consider free cash flow to be a liquidity measure that provides useful information to management and investors about the amount of cash generated by the business that, after the acquisition of property and equipment, including information technology infrastructure and land and buildings, can be used for strategic opportunities, including investing in our business, making strategic acquisitions, and strengthening the balance sheet. Analysis of free cash flow also facilitates management’s comparisons of our operating results to competitors’ operating results. A limitation of using free cash flow versus the GAAP measure of net cash provided by operating activities as a means for evaluating Google is that free cash flow does not represent the total increase or decrease in the cash balance from operations for the period because it excludes cash used for capital expenditures during the period. Our management compensates for this limitation by providing information about our capital expenditures on the face of the statement of cash flows and under the caption “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and Annual Report on Form 10-K. Google has computed free cash flow using the same consistent method from quarter to quarter and year to year.

    Non-GAAP international revenues. We define non-GAAP international revenues as international revenues excluding the impact of foreign exchange rate movements and hedging activities. Non-GAAP international revenues are calculated by translating current quarter revenues using prior quarter and prior year exchange rates, as well as excluding any hedging gains realized in the current quarter. We consider non-GAAP international revenues as a useful metric as it facilitates management’s internal comparison to our historical performance.

    The accompanying tables have more details on the non-GAAP financial measures that are most directly comparable to GAAP financial measures and the related reconciliations between these financial measures.

    Image via Google

  • Netflix Releases Earnings, Ends Quarter With 53.1 Million Members

    Netflix Releases Earnings, Ends Quarter With 53.1 Million Members

    Netflix just released its earnings report for the third quarter, and announced that it had 53.1 million global members at the end of Q3. That means they’ve added roughly 3.1 million since last quarter. 37.22 million of its members are in the U.S. The company expects to add 4 million more in Q4.

    Revenue was $1.22 billion. Here’s an overview of the financials.

    In a letter to shareholders, CEO Reed Hastings and CFO David Wells talked about the company’s original content slate, multi-territory TV licensing, net neutrality, and HBO’s plans to offer a standalone service.

    They say that since Netflix and HBO offer different content, they believe both services will prosper. They’re probably right.

    Netflix’s DVD business still has six million members, and added $89 million in contribution profit during Q3. The company expects close to the same in Q4.

    Netflix is in production on nine new Netflix original series around the world, and has more original documentaries, comedy specials, and original films on the way, not to mention new kids series.

    Image via Netflix

  • Mark Zuckerberg Donates $25 Million to Fight Ebola on the Front Lines

    Mark Zuckerberg Donates $25 Million to Fight Ebola on the Front Lines

    Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg said yesterday that he and his wife would $25 million to the Centers for Disease Control Foundation to fight Ebola.

    The nation’s most famous hoodie-wearing public figure since the Unabomber announced his donation — where else? — on his Facebook page.

    “We need to get Ebola under control in the near term so that it doesn’t spread further and become a long-term global health crisis that we end up fighting for decades at large scale, like HIV or polio. We believe our grant is the quickest way to empower the CDC and the experts in this field to prevent this outcome.”

    The grant is from Zuckerberg and his wife, Priscilla Chan, who is a doctor. Their gift will go to help fight the disease on the front lines in Africa. It will be used to train staff, set up care centers, and identify Ebola cases.

    “One problem right now is that most people — including government leaders — don’t realize we’re at such a critical turning point,” Zuckerberg said. “Spending $25 million to help get this under control now is very little cost compared to all the lives it could save and all the billions of dollars of costs we’d have to spend fighting the disease if it spread much further.”

    While Ebola is a terrible and often-fatal disease, medical professionals do offer encouraging news about the disease that should help calm the public. For example, Ebola is not an airborne virus. This is cause for relief, since it means that transmission and spread of the disease is limited to bodily fluid contact. Persons who have the disease and capable of transmitting it are usually far too sick to be traveling. This limits the possibility of transmission to, literally, spitting distance.

    But that can be far enough to start a pandemic. After all, HIV is not airborne either. Efforts like those bankrolled by Zuckerberg and Chan are needed to get a handle on what could be a globally devastating disease.

    More information about Ebola can be found on the CDC Foundation website.

  • Hawk Is Sick and Tired of Man’s Encroachment on the Sky, Takes Out Drone

    Hawk Is Sick and Tired of Man’s Encroachment on the Sky, Takes Out Drone

    Wanna see a hawk that hates drones as much as the FAA?

    A hawk flying above Magazine Beach park in Cambridge, Massachusetts saw a quadcopter drone all up in its business and decided to do what a hawk should do in such a situation – take it the f–k out.

    “On Oct 8th, I was flying my quadcopter at Magazine Beach Park in Cambridge, when a hawk decided he wasn’t too happy with my invasion of his airspace… As far as I could tell, the hawk came out unscathed, and having defeated his prey, was happy to retreat. (As soon as he flew at me, I throttled down the props to try to minimize any harm to the bird.) The quadcopter came out unscathed as well,” says the owner of the quadcopter and invader of airspace Christopher Schmidt.

    Good thing both survived. I think we can share the skies. Can there be a peace?

    Image via Christopher Schmidt, YouTube screenshot, h/t Digital Trends

  • What The eBay PayPal Split-Up Means For Them And For You

    What The eBay PayPal Split-Up Means For Them And For You

    Big news in the world of e-commerce. eBay announced that it will separate eBay and PayPal into two independent, publicly-trade companies next year.

    Do you expect each of these companies to thrive separately? Let us know what you think.

    Investor Carl Icahn had famously called for such a spin-off, and it looks like he is now getting his wish. He’s reportedly the company’s six-largest shareholder.

    The decision came after the Board of Directors reviewed the company’s growth strategies and structure. They concluded that creating two separate businesses best positions them to “capitalize on their respective growth opportunities in the rapidly changing global commerce and payments landscape.”

    Indeed, both eBay and PayPal face greatly increased competition from numerous big players including Google, Apple, Amazon, Alibaba, and Square, to name a few. Then there are companies like Stripe, which already has deals in place with Facebook and Twitter.

    “eBay and PayPal are two great businesses with leading global positions in commerce and payments,” said President and CEO John Donahoe. “For more than a decade eBay and PayPal have mutually benefited from being part of one company, creating substantial shareholder value. However, a thorough strategic review with our board shows that keeping eBay and PayPal together beyond 2015 clearly becomes less advantageous to each business strategically and competitively. The industry landscape is changing, and each business faces different competitive opportunities and challenges.”

    “eBay and PayPal will be sharper and stronger, and more focused and competitive as leading, standalone companies in their respective markets,” Donahoe added. “As independent companies, eBay and PayPal will enjoy added flexibility to pursue new market and partnership opportunities. And we are confident following a thorough assessment of the relationships between eBay and PayPal that operating agreements can maintain synergies going forward. Our board and management team believe that putting eBay and PayPal on independent paths in 2015 is best for each business and will create additional value for our shareholders.”

    In its announcement, eBay listed the following as three conclusions the Board came to upon completing its review:

    1. A changing competitive landscape creates enormous opportunities for eBay and PayPal; separation will create sharper strategic focus and better position each business to capitalize on those growth opportunities as independent companies. The pace of industry change and innovation in commerce and payments requires maximum flexibility to stay competitive and drive global leadership.

    2. The benefits of the existing relationships between eBay and PayPal will naturally decline over time and can be optimized in arm’s length operating agreements between the two entities. Arm’s length operating agreements can formalize the existing relationships between the two companies and capture ongoing synergies.

    3. This is the best path for delivering sustainable shareholder value. eBay is a leading global commerce platform that has benefited from PayPal, and PayPal is a strong, rapidly growing global payments leader because it has been part of eBay. But beyond 2015, eBay and PayPal will each benefit more and create greater value from the strategic focus, speed, flexibility and agility that come with being independent publicly traded companies.

    Donahoe and CFO Bob Swan will lead the separation of each business with oversight from the board, including the determination of management and capital structures for both companies. Interestingly, neither Donahoe nor Swan will have an executive management role in either of the separated companies, though they’ll most likely serve on the Boards.

    eBay’s new CEO will become Devin Wenig, who is currently president of eBay Marketplaces. Scott Schenkel, who is currently CFO of eBay Marketplaces will become CFO of eBay.

    “eBay has been a leading innovator in the world of commerce for almost 20 years; it’s an incredibly special business,” Donahoe said. “Since joining eBay three years ago, Devin has proven to be an exceptional global leader and operating executive. He is steadily enhancing eBay’s unique assets and capabilities and creating new commerce experiences to ensure long-term growth and commerce leadership. He will make a fantastic CEO of eBay.”

    Dan Schulman joins PayPal from American Express, where he was president of Enterprise Growth, to be President of PayPal, effective immediately, he will also be responsible for designating the CEO of the standalone PayPal company.

    “As both a leading global technology platform and a financial services business, PayPal requires a diverse blend of leadership skills and operating experience in its president and future CEO,” Donahoe said. “Dan has a proven track record of leading complex technology businesses at scale, driving sustainable growth and understanding how to innovate to drive competitive advantage and deliver compelling experiences for customers. I am thrilled to have him lead PayPal forward as a publicly traded, independent global payments leader, and we welcome him to the team.”

    What does the mean split mean for current customers and businesses using eBay and PayPal? eBay had this to say:

    The creation of independent eBay and PayPal businesses will take up to 12 months to complete so this has no immediate impact on your account. Likewise, you can continue to count on everything you expect from eBay today. Innovation, value, trust, selection, and global reach will remain central to our business. And we will continue to work closely with PayPal to ensure payments remain a seamless part of the eBay experience.

    As an active customer, you help make eBay what it is. eBay has always been more than a store. It is a community of people—buyers and sellers—connecting around the world. Thank you for being part of this amazing community. As we begin this next chapter of the eBay story, you have our commitment to make sure people like you remain at the heart of everything we do.

    The spin-off is expected to be completed in the second half of 2015. It is subject to market, regulatory, and other conditions.

    Some are already speculating that another company like Google could make a play to acquire PayPal, but given that it’s not even going to be its own company for another year, there’s no telling what will happen in the space in the meantime.

    eBay has a history of getting rid of companies it previously acquired. It sold Skype to an investment group, which in turn sold it to Microsoft. It also sold StumbleUpon, which became profitable a year ago.

    Do you think users will benefit from the separation of eBay and PayPal? Will it make any difference? Share your thoughts in the comments.

    Image via Wikimedia Commons

  • Should Twitter Change Its Timeline Feature?

    Should Twitter Change Its Timeline Feature?

    There have been rumors and fears for quite some time that Twitter would one day implement an algorithmic timeline, which would essentially be its equivalent to Facebook’s News Feed. Unfortunately, it doesn’t seem like many users want that.

    Would you favor an algorithmic approach to the Twitter timeline? Should they make it an option? Should they just leave things alone altogether? Tell us what you think.

    Fueling the rumors, Twitter CFO Anthony Noto recently spoke at the Citi Global Technology Conference about priorities at the company, which according to The Wall Street Journal, include an algorithm-driven content feed, a better search engine, and group chatting. I don’t think many will complain about better search or group chatting, but that algorithm-driven content feed part has people up in arms.

    The WSJ reports:

    Twitter’s timeline is organized in reverse chronological order, a delivery system that has not changed since the product was created eight years ago and one that some early adopters consider sacred to the core Twitter experience. But this “isn’t the most relevant experience for a user,” Noto said. Timely tweets can get buried at the bottom of the feed if the user doesn’t have the app open, for example. “Putting that content in front of the person at that moment in time is a way to organize that content better.”

    Some reactions from users:

    I’d have included tweets in favor of the change if I saw any.

    Suffice it to say, a lot of people are frustrated with Twitter right now, even though the big changes haven’t gone into effect yet (if they even do). The company is, however, also responsible for the death of Twitpic apparently.

    Twitter has already started to tinker with the Timeline a bit, adding favorites from people you follow, for example, though as CEO Dick Costolo said, these only appear when you refresh your timeline twice and they have no additional content to show you. You’re more likely to see that stuff if you don’t follow many accounts.

    The kind of change Noto seems to be referring to would make Twitter much more Facebook-like, and that means your organic reach will be in jeopardy just as it has been on Facebook. Getting in front of your followers will be at the mercy of Twitter, who is pushing advertising more than ever.

    We may see some controversial days ahead.

    Of course some tweets would benefit from an algorithmic approach. As Twitter’s analytics made clear, most tweets already aren’t getting a great amount of reach to begin with. The algorithm approach could mean more visibility for more of your content, which could lead to things like more web traffic and more conversions. But it would still be at the mercy of Twitter, and it would ultimately come down to what kind of content Twitter felt like showing to users. Obviously, they want you to spend money on advertising, so it’s hard to imagine the benefits for unpaid content would outweigh the need to pay to play.

    What do you think? Is an algorithmic Twitter Timeline a good idea? Let us know in the comments.

    Image via Twitter

  • Twitter’s Apparently Thinking About Group Chat

    Twitter’s Apparently Thinking About Group Chat

    Does Twitter need a group chat feature? Would you use it?

    According to the company’s CFO, group chat is one of the functions high up on their future innovation list. Speaking at the Citi Global Technology Conference in New York, Twitter’s Anthony Noto hinted that the company is looking into direct messaging between multiple users – clearly Twitter’s foray into group chat. As of now, users can only direct message one other user at a time.

    In the context of discussing a football game, Noto had this to say, per The Wall Street Journal:

    “I’m not sure I want to have (that) conversation in front of my boss and the rest of the 271m global users. I might want to take that to a private setting which you can do through direct messaging. Today you can only do that one to one as opposed to one to many. So that’s an example of innovation around sharing or expression that we can pursue over time.”

    In other news from Noto’s talk, Twitter’s head of product has apparently put search at the forefront of his priorities.

    “If you think about our search capabilities we have a great data set of topical information about topical tweets, the hierarchy within search really has to lend itself to that taxonomy,” said Noto. He went on to say Twitter needs “an algorithm that delivers the depth and breadth of the content we have on a specific topic and then eventually as it relates to people.”

    Messaging is big right now. Facebook bought WhatsApp for $19 billion dollars. Snapchat is reportedly worth $10 billion. Facebook just unbundled and turned a lot of its focus to a standalone messenger app. Every day, millions of people use Twitter to communicate – but mostly publicly. It sort of makes sense for Twitter to want to give its users a way to chat privately and more efficiently.

    Image via Rosaura Ochoa, Flickr Creative Commons

  • Amazon CFO Thomas Szkutak To Retire

    Amazon CFO Thomas Szkutak To Retire

    Amazon announced on Wednesday that Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Thomas J. Szkutak will retire from the company next June. He has been CFO since joining Amazon in 2002.

    Szkutak currently oversees the controller, treasury, investor relations, tax, internal audit and facilities functions at Amazon, in addition to the financial management of its business units.

    VP of Finance Brian T. Olsavsky will succeed him Szkutak as CFO, reporting directly to CEO Jeff Bezos.

    Bezos said, “Tom’s impact over the past 12 years is evident in every part of our business. Under Tom’s stewardship, customers have benefitted from category expansion and geographical expansion, along with amazing new businesses like AWS and Kindle. The day Tom joined the company was a very lucky one for Amazon’s shareowners and customers and for all of us who’ve had the pleasure and fun of getting to work with him. We wish Tom and his family all the best in their next round of adventures.”

    Szkutak added, “It’s been a privilege for me to work with so many talented people who are continually inventing on behalf of customers, and now I look forward to spending more time with my family and other outside interests. I’ve worked very closely with Brian Olsavsky over the past 12 years and have seen firsthand how talented he is, and I have confidence that he will be a great CFO for Amazon.com.”

    Olsavsky also joined the company in 2002. He and Szkutak will work together on the transition of CFO responsibilities over the next 10 months.

    Image via Google Play

  • “Real Housewives of New Jersey” Brawls: Husband Edition

    “Real Housewives of New Jersey” Brawls: Husband Edition

    Well, it looks like the Real Housewives of New Jersey wives aren’t the only ones willing to throw down to get their point across!

    Who would have thought that not showing up for a “guy’s night out” get together would lead to a brawl? That was the case when Joe Gorga, husband of Housewives star Melissa Gorga, went at it with Jim Marchese.

    Marchese runs a mortgage company which takes up most of his time. According to People magazine, the business is only part of the reason Amber Marchese’s husband is so scarce.

    He’s also actively avoiding the Giudices, Gorga’s relatives, because of their recent fraud scandal.

    Gorga confronted Marchese about his behavior outside of an establishment, declaring the man “unfit to shine [his] shoes”.

    It is clear that Gorga and Marchese have two entirely different philosophies about how to settle a conflict.

    Gorga, who tangled with his brother-in-law Joe Giudice in the past, is a far more “physical” individual who is intent to settle matters with his fists.

    Marchese prefers to get at his opponents in a different way.

    “Touch me and I’ll [have you arrested]” is more or less Marchese’s approach.

    “If I want to hurt you [Gorga], I’m going to sue you,” the man taunted.

    “I’m going to leverage your house, I’m going to give you three years of hell in a courtroom, I’m going to bleed you dry financially, and I’m going to humiliate you as I depose you for eight hours and make you my bitch.”

    ….Damn.

    That really does sound far more painful than a few minutes of brawling.

    Perhaps he should pass this wisdom on to his wife Amber Marchese, who had her own conflicts to deal with thanks in large part to Melissa Gorga.

    Amber Marchese got her hair yanked during a scrap with twins Nicole Napolitano and Teresa Aprea over spreading rumors that alleged Napolitano is a home-wrecker.

    After sharing the gossip with Gorga, the latter immediately reported back to the twins.

    It looks like on RHONJ, conflict is for the wives and husbands.

    With the Giudices likely headed to prison, Bravo has done a good job of finding new sources of drama to entertain viewers during their absence.

    Image via YouTube

  • Was Yelp Misleading About Its Reviews?

    Was Yelp Misleading About Its Reviews?

    Yelp is no stranger to legal battles, nor is it a stranger to complaints about how it handles reviews. Now, the company faces a new class action suit from shareholders, accusing it of selling over $81 million in stock, while misleading shareholders about the legitimacy of reviews.

    Do you believe Yelp would mislead investors about its reviews, or do you think the suit is baseless? Share your thoughts in the comments.

    Named defendants include CEO Jeremy Stoppelman, CFO Robert Krolik, and COO Geoffrey Donaker.

    Joseph Curry, who filed the suit, alleges that Yelp “made false and misleading statements concerning the company’s true business and financial condition, including but not limited to the true nature of the so-called “firsthand” experiences and reviews appearing on the company’s website, the robustness of its processes and algorithms purportedly designed to screen unreliable reviews, and the company’s forecasted financial growth prospects and the extent to which they were reliant upon undisclosed business practices, including but not limited to requiring business customers to pay to suppress negative reviews.”

    The complaint adds, “The class period misrepresentations made by defendants concerning the company’s current financial and business condition, including its forecasted financial and business condition alleged herein, were each materially false and misleading when made and caused the company’s stock to trade at artificially inflated prices of over $98.00 per share on March 4, 2014, because defendants knew, or recklessly disregarded, the following facts:

    (a) Reviews, including anonymous reviews, appearing on the company’s website were not all authentic “firsthand” reviews, but instead included fraudulent reviews by reviewers who did not have first-hand experience with the business being reviewed;

    (b) Algorithms purportedly designed to screen unreliable reviews did not comprehensively do so, and instead the company allowed such unreliable reviews to remain prominent while the company tried to sell services designed to suppress negative reviews or make them go away; and

    (c) In light of the above facts, the representations concerning the company’s current and future financial condition and prospects, and the extent to which they were reliant upon undisclosed business practices, did not have a reasonable basis.”

    It goes on to allege that the defendants sold over a million shares of Yelp stock at prices as high as $98.99 per share for “insider trading proceeds” of over $81.5 million. As a point of reference, shares are $67.78 as of the time of this writing.

    Here’s the actual complaint (via GigaOm):

    Curry v Yelp by jeff_roberts881

    Yelp has suggested that the claims made in the complaint are without merit, as you would expect.

    The company was in the news earlier this week as a hotel called Union Street Guest House was charging people for posting negative reviews. As a result, people who hadn’t actually stayed there flocked to the hotel’s Yelp page to leave bad reviews. Yelp said this was against its policy, and said “reviews that are contributed as a result of media attention and do not reflect first-hand experiences run counter to Yelp’s Terms of Service and will be removed from the site.”

    Still, seemingly illegitimate reviews (including one from Hitler) have continued to appear on the page. Sometimes fictional businesses and reviews appear on the site as well.

    In April, the FTC disclosed that it had seen over 2,000 complaints about Yelp’s business practices between 2008 and March of this year. The company, which is celebrating its ten-year anniversary, released its quarterly earnings report last week, as it became profitable for the first time since going public in 2012.

    Do you think Yelp can actually do a good job of keeping reviews legitimate? Let us know in the comments.

    Image via Yelp (Flickr)

  • Oklahoma Teen Missionary Accused of Rape in Kenya

    Oklahoma Teen Missionary Accused of Rape in Kenya

    A 19-year-old missionary from Oklahoma accused of raping and molesting children in Kenya was ordered by a judge to remain in custody on Tuesday. There had been a ruling on Monday allowing the teen to be bailed out for $10,000 and stay under house arrest, which was revoked.

    U.S. Magistrate Shon Erwin granted Matthew Durham a release on bond under house arrest with his father to act as custodian. Though, U.S. District Judge David Russell stepped in and ordered Durham to stay in jail while the federal court considers the appeal.

    Durham, of Edmond, OK, has been accused of sexually assaulting up to 10 boys and girls aged six to nine at the Upendo Children’s Home in Nairobi. Durham’s attorneys believe the teen was coerced into making a confession, and asserted that the teen was told he would “face certain death” in Kenya.

    Durham’s mother, father and pastor testified on his behalf during his detention hearing on Monday, corroborating the story of coercion in Kenya, though prosecutors revealed that the teen claimed a demon name “Luke” told him to commit the attacks.

    Federal prosecutors filed a Motion for Detention Tuesday, citing that Durham could be a flight risk and a danger to the public. U.S. attorney Sanford Coats commented, “The defendant poses a significant danger to the community if released.”

    Durham was indicted for one count of traveling with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, engaging in sexual conduct and aggravated sexual abuse.

    Prosecutors said Kenya is pursuing extradition for Durham to face charges there.

    Image via Wikimedia Commons

  • Facebook Q1 Earnings Released, Revenue Up 72%, CFO Stepping Down

    Facebook Q1 Earnings Released, Revenue Up 72%, CFO Stepping Down

    Facebook just released its earnings for the first quarter, with revenue of $2.50 billion, up 72% year-over-year. Revenue from advertising was $2.27 billion, up 82% over that time.

    Daily active users were 802 million as of last month, up of 21% year-over-year. That’s 609 million on mobile (up 43%). Monthly active users were1.28 billion as of the end of March, up 15% year-over-year. Mobile MAUs were 1.01 billion, up 34%.

    CEO Mark Zuckerberg said, “Facebook’s business is strong and growing, and this quarter was a great start to 2014. We’ve made some long term bets on the future while staying focused on executing and improving our core products and business. We’re in great position to continue making progress towards our mission.”

    More slides here.

    The company also announced that CFO David Ebersman will be stepping down later this year. He has been in the role for five years. He will be succeeded by David Wehner, Facebook’s VP of Corporate Finance and Business Planning (and former Zynga CFO) as of June 1st. Ebersman will remain with the company through September for transition.

    “David has been a great partner in building Facebook, and I’m grateful for everything he’s done to help make the world more open and connected,” said Zuckerberg. “David set us up to operate efficiently and make the long term investments we need, and built an incredibly strong team including Dave Wehner, our next CFO. I look forward to working with Dave in his new role.”

    “This has been a tough decision because Facebook is such a great company and has such a bright future ahead, but I’ve decided to move back into healthcare where I spent my career before Facebook,” Ebersman said. “It’s been a privilege working at Facebook and being part of such a great team. We have an incredibly talented finance organization, and I have complete confidence in Dave Wehner and his ability to lead the team going forward.”

    Kara Swisher is reporting that Ebersman is likely to be focusing on moving back to the healthcare space, where he worked before joining Facebook.

    From the conference call…

    Mark said its core Facebook mobile app has over a billion users, while Messenger and Instagram have 200 million. The current priority for those two as well as WhatsApp is growth, and monetization isn’t a near-term priority. With new apps like Paper, Facebook will wait until they have 100 million before worrying about how they fit into the business model.

    App install ads have seen 350 million installs to date.

    He’s really encouraged by the feedback they’ve been seeing about ads. Not everyone is so enthusiastic.

    Here’s the release in its entirety:

    MENLO PARK, Calif., April 23, 2014 /PRNewswire/ — Facebook, Inc. (NASDAQ: FB) today reported financial results for the quarter ended March 31, 2014.

    “Facebook’s business is strong and growing, and this quarter was a great start to 2014,” said Mark Zuckerberg, Facebook founder and CEO. “We’ve made some long term bets on the future while staying focused on executing and improving our core products and business. We’re in great position to continue making progress towards our mission.”

    First Quarter 2014 Financial Summary

    Three Months Ended

     March 31,

    In millions, except percentages and per share amounts 2013 2014
    Revenue $                  1,458 $                      2,502
    Income from Operations
        GAAP $                     373 $                      1,075
        Non-GAAP $                     563 $                      1,374
    Operating Margin
        GAAP 26 % 43 %
        Non-GAAP 39 % 55 %
    Net Income
        GAAP $                     219 $                         642
        Non-GAAP $                     312 $                         885
    Diluted Earnings per Share (EPS)
        GAAP $                    0.09 $                        0.25
        Non-GAAP $                    0.12 $                        0.34

    First Quarter 2014 Operational Highlights

    • Daily active users (DAUs) were 802 million on average for March 2014, an increase of 21% year-over-year.
    • Mobile DAUs were 609 million on average for March 2014, an increase of 43% year-over-year.
    • Monthly active users (MAUs) were 1.28 billion as of March 31, 2014, an increase of 15% year-over-year.
    • Mobile MAUs were 1.01 billion as of March 31, 2014, an increase of 34% year-over-year.

    First Quarter 2014 Financial Highlights

     

    Revenue – Revenue for the first quarter of 2014 totaled $2.50 billion, an increase of 72%, compared with $1.46 billion in the first quarter of 2013.

    • Revenue from advertising was $2.27 billion, an 82% increase from the same quarter last year.
    • Mobile advertising revenue represented approximately 59% of advertising revenue for the first quarter of 2014, up from approximately 30% of advertising revenue in the first quarter of 2013.
    • Payments and other fees revenue was $237 million for the first quarter of 2014.

    Costs and expenses – GAAP costs and expenses for the first quarter of 2014 were $1.43 billion, an increase of 32% from the first quarter of 2013, driven primarily by increased headcount and infrastructure expense. Excluding share-based compensation and related payroll tax expenses, non-GAAP costs and expenses were $1.13 billion in the first quarter of 2014, up 26% compared to $895 millionfor the first quarter of 2013.

    Income from operations – For the first quarter of 2014, GAAP income from operations was $1.08 billion, up 188% compared to $373 million in the first quarter of 2013. Excluding share-based compensation and related payroll tax expenses, non-GAAP income from operations for the first quarter of 2014 was $1.37 billion, up 144% compared to $563 million for the first quarter of 2013.

    Operating margin – GAAP operating margin was 43% for the first quarter of 2014, compared to 26% in the first quarter of 2013. Excluding share-based compensation and related payroll tax expenses, non-GAAP operating margin was 55% for the first quarter of 2014, compared to 39% for the first quarter of 2013.

     

    Provision for income taxes – GAAP income tax expense for the first quarter of 2014 was $433 million, representing a 40% effective tax rate. Excluding share-based compensation and related payroll tax expenses, the non-GAAP effective tax rate would have been approximately 36%.

    Net income and EPS  For the first quarter of 2014, GAAP net income was $642 million, up 193% compared to $219 million for the first quarter of 2013. Excluding share-based compensation and related payroll tax expenses and income tax adjustments, non-GAAP net income for the first quarter of 2014 was $885 million, up 184% compared to $312 million for the first quarter of 2013. GAAP diluted EPS was $0.25 in the first quarter of 2014, up 178% compared to $0.09 in the first quarter of 2013. Excluding share-based compensation and related payroll tax expenses and income tax adjustments, non-GAAP diluted EPS for the first quarter of 2014 was$0.34, up 183% compared to $0.12 in the first quarter of 2013.

    Capital expenditures – Capital expenditures for the first quarter of 2014 were $363 million.

    Cash and marketable securities – Cash and marketable securities were $12.63 billion at the end of the first quarter of 2014.

    Free cash flow – Free cash flow for the first quarter of 2014 was $922 million.

    CFO Transition – Facebook today also announced that David Ebersman has informed the company of his intention to step down as chief financial officer after serving in the position for almost five years. On June 1, 2014, he will be succeeded as CFO by David Wehner, currently Facebook’s Vice President, Corporate Finance and Business Planning. Ebersman will remain with the company through September to ensure a seamless transition of his responsibilities.

    Wehner joined Facebook in November 2012 from Zynga, where he served as CFO. Earlier, he spent nine years at Allen & Company where he was a managing director. Wehner has a B.S. in Chemistry from Georgetown University, and an M.S. in Applied Physics from Stanford University.

    “David has been a great partner in building Facebook, and I’m grateful for everything he’s done to help make the world more open and connected,” said Zuckerberg. “David set us up to operate efficiently and make the long term investments we need, and built an incredibly strong team including Dave Wehner, our next CFO. I look forward to working with Dave in his new role.”

    “This has been a tough decision because Facebook is such a great company and has such a bright future ahead, but I’ve decided to move back into healthcare where I spent my career before Facebook,” Ebersman said. “It’s been a privilege working at Facebook and being part of such a great team. We have an incredibly talented finance organization, and I have complete confidence in Dave Wehnerand his ability to lead the team going forward.”

    Webcast and Conference Call Information

    Facebook will host a conference call to discuss the results at 2 p.m. PT / 5 p.m. ET today. The live webcast can be accessed at the Facebook Investor Relations website at investor.fb.com, along with the company’s earnings press release, financial tables and slide presentation. Facebook uses the investor.fb.com website, and intends to also use Mark Zuckerberg’s Facebook Page (https://www.facebook.com/zuck), as a means of disclosing material non-public information and for complying with its disclosure obligations under Regulation FD.

    Following the call, a replay will be available at the same website. A telephonic replay will be available for one week following the conference call at + 1 (404) 537-3406 or + 1 (855) 859-2056, conference ID 11218209.

     

    About Facebook

    Founded in 2004, Facebook’s mission is to give people the power to share and make the world more open and connected. People useFacebook to stay connected with friends and family, to discover what’s going on in the world, and to share and express what matters to them.

     

    Contacts

     

    Investors:
    Deborah Crawford
    investor@fb.com / investor.fb.com

    Press:
    Vanessa Chan
    press@fb.com / newsroom.fb.com

    Forward Looking Statements

    This press release contains forward-looking statements regarding our future business expectations, which are subject to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements are only predictions and may differ materially from actual results due to a variety of factors including: our ability to retain or increase users and engagement levels; our reliance on advertising revenue; our ability to continue to monetize our mobile products; risks associated with new product development and their introduction as well as other new business initiatives; our emphasis on user growth and engagement and the user experience over short-term financial results; competition; litigation; privacy and regulatory concerns; risks associated with acquisitions; security breaches; and our ability to manage growth and geographically-dispersed operations. These and other potential risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ from the results predicted are more fully detailed under the caption “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on January 31, 2014, which is available on our Investor Relations website at investor.fb.com and on the SEC website at www.sec.gov. Additional information will also be set forth in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2014. In addition, please note that the date of this press release is April 23, 2014, and any forward-looking statements contained herein are based on assumptions that we believe to be reasonable as of this date. We undertake no obligation to update these statements as a result of new information or future events.

    Non-GAAP Financial Measures

    To supplement our consolidated financial statements, which are prepared and presented in accordance with GAAP, we use the following non-GAAP financial measures: revenue excluding foreign exchange effect and advertising revenue excluding foreign exchange effect; non-GAAP costs and expenses; non-GAAP income from operations; non-GAAP net income; non-GAAP diluted shares; non-GAAP diluted earnings per share; non-GAAP operating margin; non-GAAP effective tax rate; and free cash flow. The presentation of these financial measures is not intended to be considered in isolation or as a substitute for, or superior to, financial information prepared and presented in accordance with GAAP. Investors are cautioned that there are material limitations associated with the use of non-GAAP financial measures as an analytical tool. In particular, many of the adjustments to our GAAP financial measures reflect the exclusion of items, specifically share-based compensation expense and payroll tax related to share-based compensation expense, and the related income tax effects, that are recurring and will be reflected in our financial results for the foreseeable future. In addition, these measures may be different from non-GAAP financial measures used by other companies, limiting their usefulness for comparison purposes. We compensate for these limitations by providing specific information regarding the GAAP amounts excluded from these non-GAAP financial measures.

    We believe these non-GAAP financial measures provide investors with useful supplemental information about the financial performance of our business, enable comparison of financial results between periods where certain items may vary independent of business performance, and allow for greater transparency with respect to key metrics used by management in operating our business.

    We exclude the following items from one or more of our non-GAAP financial measures:

    Share-based compensation expense. We exclude share-based compensation expense because we believe that the non-GAAP financial measures excluding this item provide meaningful supplemental information regarding operational performance. In particular, because of varying available valuation methodologies, subjective assumptions and the variety of award types that companies can use under FASB ASC Topic 718, we believe that providing non-GAAP financial measures that exclude this expense allows investors the ability to make more meaningful comparisons between our operating results and those of other companies. Accordingly, we believe that excluding this expense provides investors and management with greater visibility to the underlying performance of our business operations, facilitates comparison of our results with other periods, and may also facilitate comparison with the results of other companies in our industry.

    Payroll tax expense related to share-based compensation. We exclude payroll tax expense related to share-based compensation expense because, without excluding these tax expenses, investors would not see the full effect that excluding share-based compensation expense had on our operating results. These expenses are tied to the exercise or vesting of underlying equity awards and the price of our common stock at the time of vesting or exercise, which factors may vary from period to period independent of the operating performance of our business. Similar to share-based compensation expense, we believe that excluding this payroll tax expense provides investors and management with greater visibility to the underlying performance of our business operations and facilitates comparison with other periods as well as the results of other companies.

    Income tax effect of share-based compensation and related payroll tax expenses. We believe excluding the income tax effect of non-GAAP adjustments assists investors and management in understanding the tax provision related to those adjustments and provides useful supplemental information regarding the underlying performance of our business operations.

    Foreign exchange effect on revenue. We translate revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2014 using prior year exchange rates for our settlement currencies, which we believe is a useful metric that facilitates comparison to our historical performance.

    Purchases of property and equipment; Property and equipment acquired under capital leases. We subtract both purchases of property and equipment and property and equipment acquired under capital leases in our calculation of free cash flow because we believe that these two items collectively represent the amount of property and equipment we need to procure to support our business, regardless of whether we finance such property or equipment with a capital lease. We believe that this methodology can provide useful supplemental information to help investors better understand underlying trends in our business.

    For more information on our non-GAAP financial measures and a reconciliation of such measures to the nearest GAAP measure, please see the “Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Results to Nearest GAAP Measures” table in this press release.

     

    FACEBOOK, INC.
    CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
    (In millions, except for per share amounts)
    (Unaudited)
    Three Months Ended March 31,
    2013 2014
    Revenue $                  1,458 $                 2,502
    Costs and expenses:
         Cost of revenue 413 462
         Research and development 293 455
         Marketing and sales 203 323
         General and administrative 176 187
            Total costs and expenses 1,085 1,427
    Income from operations 373 1,075
    Interest and other income/(expense), net (20)
    Income before provision for income taxes 353 1,075
    Provision for income taxes 134 433
    Net income $                     219 $                    642
    Less: Net income attributable to participating securities 2 3
    Net income attributable to Class A and Class B common stockholders $                     217 $                    639
    Earnings per share attributable to Class A and Class B common stockholders:
         Basic $                    0.09 $                   0.25
         Diluted $                    0.09 $                   0.25
    Weighted average shares used to compute earnings per share attributable to Class A and Class B common stockholders:
         Basic 2,386 2,545
         Diluted 2,499 2,609
    Share-based compensation expense included in costs and expenses:
         Cost of revenue $                         8 $                      12
         Research and development 117 181
         Marketing and sales 24 43
         General and administrative 21 38
            Total share-based compensation expense $                     170 $                    274
    Payroll tax expenses related to share-based compensation included in costs and expenses:
         Cost of revenue $                         1 $                        2
         Research and development 11 15
         Marketing and sales 4 4
         General and administrative 4 4
            Total payroll tax expenses related to share-based compensation $                       20 $                      25

     

    FACEBOOK, INC.
    CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
    (In millions)
    (Unaudited)
    December 31, 2013 March 31, 2014
    Assets
    Current assets:
    Cash and cash equivalents $                      3,323 $                      2,998
    Marketable securities 8,126 9,631
    Accounts receivable 1,109 1,006
    Prepaid expenses and other current assets 512 425
    Total current assets 13,070 14,060
    Property and equipment, net 2,882 3,074
    Goodwill and intangible assets, net 1,722 1,682
    Other assets 221 212
    Total assets $                    17,895 $                    19,028
    Liabilities and stockholders’ equity
    Current liabilities:
    Accounts payable $                           87 $                           85
    Developer partners payable 181 188
    Accrued expenses and other current liabilities 555 525
    Deferred revenue and deposits 38 38
    Current portion of capital lease obligations 239 201
    Total current liabilities 1,100 1,037
    Capital lease obligations, less current portion 237 191
    Other liabilities 1,088 1,063
    Total liabilities 2,425 2,291
    Stockholders’ equity
    Common stock and additional paid-in capital 12,297 12,921
    Accumulated other comprehensive income 14 15
    Retained earnings 3,159 3,801
    Total stockholders’ equity 15,470 16,737
    Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $                    17,895 $                    19,028

     

    FACEBOOK, INC.
    CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
    (In millions)
    (Unaudited)
    Three Months Ended March 31,
    2013 2014
    Cash flows from operating activities
    Net income $                    219 $                       642
    Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
    Depreciation and amortization 233 264
    Lease abandonment 8 (13)
    Share-based compensation 170 274
    Deferred income taxes (7) (1)
    Tax benefit from share-based award activity 59 345
    Excess tax benefit from share-based award activity (62) (348)
    Other 9 9
      Changes in assets and liabilities:
    Accounts receivable 54 105
    Prepaid expenses and other current assets (1) (4)
    Other assets (36) 16
    Accounts payable 1 (10)
    Developer partners payable 21 7
    Accrued expenses and other current liabilities (33) (27)
    Other liabilities 84 26
      Net cash provided by operating activities 719 1,285
    Cash flows from investing activities
      Purchases of property and equipment (327) (363)
      Purchases of marketable securities (1,508) (2,974)
      Sales of marketable securities 699 847
      Maturities of marketable securities 903 619
      Acquisitions of businesses, net of cash acquired, and purchases of intangible assets (99)
      Other investing activities, net 6 (1)
      Net cash used in investing activities (326) (1,872)
    Cash flows from financing activities
      Taxes paid related to net share settlement of equity awards (405) (3)
      Proceeds from exercise of stock options 8 1
      Principal payments on capital lease obligations (109) (84)
      Excess tax benefit from share-based award activity 62 348
      Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities (444) 262
    Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents (8)
    Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents (59) (325)
    Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 2,384 3,323
    Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $                 2,325 $                    2,998
    Supplemental cash flow data
      Cash paid during the period for:
    Interest $                      12 $                           4
    Income taxes $                        9 $                         37
      Non-cash investing and financing activities:
    Net change in accounts payable and accrued expenses and other current liabilities related to property and equipment additions $                      47 $                         (3)
    Property and equipment acquired under capital leases $                      11 $                         —
    Fair value of shares issued related to acquisitions of businesses and other assets $                      33 $                         —

     

    Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Results to Nearest GAAP Measures
    (In millions, except percentages and per share amounts)
    (Unaudited)
    Three Months Ended March 31,
    2013 2014
    GAAP revenue $                1,458 $                2,502
         Foreign exchange effect on 2014 revenue using 2013 rates 9
    Revenue excluding foreign exchange effect $                2,511
    GAAP revenue year-over-year change % 72 %
    Revenue excluding foreign exchange effect year-over-year change % 72 %
    GAAP advertising revenue $                1,245 $                2,265
         Foreign exchange effect on 2014 advertising revenue using 2013 rates 9
    Advertising revenue excluding foreign exchange effect $                2,274
    GAAP advertising revenue year-over-year change % 82 %
    Advertising revenue excluding foreign exchange effect year-over-year change % 83 %
    GAAP costs and expenses $                1,085 $                1,427
         Share-based compensation expense (170) (274)
         Payroll tax expenses related to share-based compensation (20) (25)
    Non-GAAP costs and expenses $                   895 $                1,128
    GAAP income from operations $                   373 $                1,075
         Share-based compensation expense 170 274
         Payroll tax expenses related to share-based compensation 20 25
    Non-GAAP income from operations $                   563 $                1,374
    GAAP net income $                   219 $                   642
         Share-based compensation expense 170 274
         Payroll tax expenses related to share-based compensation 20 25
         Income tax adjustments (97) (56)
    Non-GAAP net income $                   312 $                   885
    GAAP and Non-GAAP diluted shares 2,499 2,609
    GAAP diluted earnings per share 0.09 0.25
         Non-GAAP adjustments to net income 0.03 0.09
    Non-GAAP diluted earnings per share 0.12 0.34
    GAAP operating margin 26 % 43 %
         Share-based compensation expense 12 % 11 %
         Payroll tax expenses related to share-based compensation 1 % 1 %
    Non-GAAP operating margin 39 % 55 %
    GAAP income before provision for income taxes $                   353 $                1,075
    GAAP provision for income taxes 134 433
    GAAP effective tax rate 38 % 40 %
    GAAP income before provision for income taxes $                   353 $                1,075
    Share-based compensation and related payroll tax expenses 190 299
    Non-GAAP income before provision for income taxes $                   543 $                1,374
    Non-GAAP provision for income taxes 231 489
    Non-GAAP effective tax rate 43 % 36 %
    Net cash provided by operating activities $                   719 $                1,285
         Purchases of property and equipment (327) (363)
         Property and equipment acquired under capital leases (11)
    Free cash flow $                   381 $                   922

    SOURCE Facebook, Inc.

     

    Image via Facebook

  • Peter Oppenheimer To Retire From Apple In September

    Peter Oppenheimer To Retire From Apple In September

    It’s rare to see departures from Apple on the executive level, but they do happen. In fact, Apple’s longtime SVP and CFO is retiring this year.

    Apple announced today that Peter Oppenheimer, its senior vice president and CFO, will be retiring in September. Before that, he’ll begin transferring his duties to his successor, Luca Maestri, in June. Maestri is currently Apple’s vice president of Finance and corporate controller.

    “Peter has served as our CFO for the past decade as Apple’s annual revenue grew from $8 billion to $171 billion and our global footprint expanded dramatically. His guidance, leadership and expertise have been instrumental to Apple’s success, not only as our CFO but also in many areas beyond finance, as he frequently took on additional activities to assist across the company. His contributions and integrity as our CFO create a new benchmark for public company CFOs,” said Tim Cook, Apple CEO. “Peter is also a dear friend I always knew I could count on. Although I am sad to see him leave, I am happy he is taking time for himself and his family. As all of us who know him would have expected, he has created a professional succession plan to ensure Apple doesn’t miss a beat.”

    Oppenheimer joined Apple in 1996 as controller for the Americas, but was soon promoted to vice president and Worldwide Sales controller in 1997. From there, he moved to corporate controller before becoming CFO.

    As for his successor, Maestri began his career at General Motors where he served in various finance and operating roles for 20 years. He has also served as CFO at Nokia Siemens Network and Xerox before joining Apple in March 2013.

    “Luca has over 25 years of global experience in senior financial management, including roles as a public company CFO, and I am confident he will be a great CFO at Apple,” said Cook. “When we were recruiting for a corporate controller, we met Luca and knew he would become Peter’s successor. His contributions to Apple have already been significant in his time with us and he has quickly gained respect from his colleagues throughout the company.”

    After leaving Apple, Oppenheimer will focus on family and his new position on the Board of Directors for Goldman Sachs.

    Image via Cupertino CityChannel/YouTube

  • Even Netflix’s CFO Thinks HBO Should Probably Offer a Standalone Streaming Service

    Even Netflix’s CFO Thinks HBO Should Probably Offer a Standalone Streaming Service

    Game of Thrones is the most pirated show on TV – and it has more to do with it than just great characters, amazing set design, and Khaleesi’s boobs.

    HBO does not offer a standalone streaming service. Sure, they have HBO GO – which contains pretty much every episode of every series they’ve ever produced. But you must have an HBO subscription through a cable provider in order to access it. That’s the model that HBO has chosen to run with, and it doesn’t look like they are going to change it anytime soon (at least in the States).

    Now, people in the streaming video business are suggesting that HBO could seriously increase their subscriber base if they were to offer such a standalone HBO GO-style service. And when I said people in the streaming video business, I mean Netflix CFO David Wells.

    GigaOm quotes Wells, speaking at a recent Goldman Sachs conference,

    “We believe that if they were direct-to-consumer, there would be materially more subscribers that would pay for it in the U.S.”

    He went on to suggest that HBO could challenge Netflix in terms of domestic subscribers if they were to offer such a service.

    Of course, it’s all about cost-benefit and HBO has done their homework and made their decision. For now, the current model that ties HBO content to a cable subscription is what works for them.

    Of course, that doesn’t mean that the people don’t want a standalone, cable-free HBO GO service. You might remember a campaign that look place last summer called “Take My Money, HBO.” Tens of thousands of people flooded Twitter with pleas for HBO to, well, take their money – basically saying that they would be first in line to sign up for such a service if HBO decided to come around and offer one.

    Some people said they were willing to pay upwards of $20 a month for the hypothetical service, and the average wound up being somewhere around $12.

    It’s not like HBO is unaware of the clamoring. HBO execs have even dropped hints that such a model could, maybe, possibly, probably but probably not, definitely could, definitely couldn’t work in the future.

    “But right now we have the right model,” said HBO CEO Ricahrd Plepler earlier this year.

    Image via HBO, YouTube

  • Joy Covey, Amazon’s First CFO, Dies In Bike Accident

    Joy Covey, Amazon’s First CFO, Dies In Bike Accident

    Joy Covey, a big part in the success of Amazon’s business, has died at the age of 50. She was riding her bike in San Francisco when it happened. She was an entrepreneur and contributed to Amazon’s massive expansion, becoming their first CFO. She has been described as a self-made woman, tech entrepreneur, and intellectual powerhouse. She has a long history of working in the tech sector and got there using her intellect and highly driven work ethic.

    Covey joined Amazon as its CFO in 1996, after already working as the CFO for the digital-audio start-up called Digidesign, according to CNET. Covey has quite the success story after dropping out of high school and leaving home when she was only 15. Shortly after that, she decided to go to college at the age of 17. She graduated in two and a half years from Fresno State and then went on to Harvard in order to get dual Law and MBA degrees.

    Covey was named one of Fortune Magazine’s 50 Most Powerful Business Women during her time working for Amazon. She was very profitable in her time as the CFO and Fortune even described her greatest feat as convincing Wall Street that a profitless company was worth $22 billion. Amazon’s business is constantly growing and even features their own television shows and streaming services, as of recently.

    At the time of her death, Covey was working as the treasurer for the National Resources Defense Council. After leaving Amazon, she was a deeply committed environmentalist and helped form the Beagle Foundation, which funded a two year fellowship with the NRDC for Harvard Law School graduates. Frances Beinecke, the president of the NRDC spoke very highly of Covey’s work, saying “Her adventurous and indomitable spirit was infectious and she constantly challenged us to reach greater heights.” It is no surprise, being the environmentalist that she is, that she was riding her bike when she died.

    The accident happened in San Francisco and the San Francisco Chronicle reports that she was riding northbound around 1:30 p.m. on Wednesday when a Southbound Mazda minivan turned left onto Elk Hill Road, forcing a head-on collision, that resulted in Covey losing her life shortly after. The driver wad a 22 year old male. Art Montiel, the California Highway Patrol Officer that was on the scene said “She was wearing a helmet, but the injuries were too severe.” She was pronounced dead on the scene and there was nothing that the paramedics could do.

    She was very helpful to both organizations that she worked for and she will be forever missed by friends and family. Covey leaves behind her son Tyler, who is eight years old.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KUkhdjf32-8

    Image via Youtube

  • Early Amazon CFO Joy Covey Dies In Bicycle Collision With Minivan

    Early Amazon CFO Joy Covey Dies In Bicycle Collision With Minivan

    Former Amazon CFO Joy Covey has reportedly died in a bicycle accident on Skyline Boulevard in San Mateo County.

    CBS SF Bay Area reported that the accident occurred as the result of a collision with a white Mazda MPV minivan that turned in front of the bicycle, without naming the victim.

    PandoDaily reports that people close to the Covey family confirmed that it was Joy, who is survived by her eight-year old son.

    According to the CBS report, she had been wearing a helmet. The driver was a 22-year old male. Covey was 50.

    Covey worked at Amazon from 1996 to 2000. She is credited with being instrumental in the company’s success in its early days. She was its first CFO, and was there when the company went public in 1997. More recently, Covey had reportedly been serving as treasurer of the National Resources Defense Council.

    All Things D’s Kara Swisher fondly remembers interviewing her back in the mid-nineties before becoming good friends with her. Swisher writes:

    Joy was tough, but fair, and she always had an interesting insight to the Internet scene, cutting right through the awful and endless logrolling and posturing in the tech world to get to the actual point. She was also a wonderful mother, and a good friend to many in the tech community, including myself.

    ..

    Mostly, she was a person of substance, of heart, of grit and of much-needed humor. Joy did not just tell it like it was — she lived it like it was, too.

    Swisher shares the old interview here.

    Image: Joy Covey (Facebook)

  • Netflix CEO/CFO To Do Live Video Discussion With Moderators In Lieu Of Regular Earnings Call

    Netflix CEO/CFO To Do Live Video Discussion With Moderators In Lieu Of Regular Earnings Call

    Netflix announced on Tuesday that it will post its second-quarter 2013 financial results and business outlook on Monday, July 22nd at about 1:05 PM Pacific Time.

    Investors will no doubt be eager to hear of the company’s performance in relation to its original shows like House of Cards, Hemlock Grove and Arrested Development, and how these have impacted new subscriptions.

    House of Cards already has a second season in the works, and the company recently announced the renewals of both Hemlock Grove and the upcoming Orange is the New Black, indicating how serious it really is about original programming as it pertains to the future of Netflix. While nothing has been announced, Netflix has also expressed interest (as has the show’s creator) in bringing back Arrested Development.

    Interestingly, rather than doing a traditional earnings call, Netflix has elected to provide a live video discussion featuring CEO Reed Hastings and CFO David Wells to be moderated by BTIG Resarch’s Rich Greenfield and CNBC’s Julia Boorstin. The executives will be answering questions submitted by email and Twitter. These can be submitted to Greenfield at rgreenfield@btig.com or @RichBTIG or Boorstin at Julia.boorstin@nbcuni.com or @JBoorstin.

    According to Netflix, the moderators will incorporate as many submitted questions into the discussion as time allows.

    If you wish to watch the discussion live, you will be able to find it on Netflix’s Investor Relations page.

    Image: James Duncan Davidson/O’Reilly Media, Inc. (Wikimedia Commons)

  • Microsoft Reports $20.49 Billion in Revenue, CFO Leaves

    Microsoft Reports $20.49 Billion in Revenue, CFO Leaves

    Microsoft released its Q3 earnings, including $20.49 billion in revenue. Operating income was $7.61 billion. Net income was $6.06 billion.

    CEO Steve Ballmer said, “The bold bets we made on cloud services are paying off as people increasingly choose Microsoft services including Office 365, Windows Azure, Xbox LIVE, and Skype. While there is still work to do, we are optimistic that the bets we’ve made on Windows devices position us well for the long-term.”

    In addition to the results, the company announced that CFO Peter Klein will leave at the end of the current fiscal year after four years in the role and 11 years with the company.

    “I’ve had a great experience as CFO and overall in my time at Microsoft,” Klein said. “We have an incredibly strong finance organization, and I’m looking forward to working with my successor on the transition through the end of the fiscal year.”

    Here’s the release in its entirety:

    REDMOND, Wash. — Apr. 18, 2013 — Microsoft Corp. today announced quarterly revenue of $20.49 billion for the quarter ended March 31, 2013. Operating income, net income, and diluted earnings per share for the quarter were $7.61 billion, $6.06 billion, and $0.72 per share.

    These financial results reflect the net recognition of revenue related to the Windows Upgrade Offer, Office Upgrade Offer and Pre-Sales, and the Entertainment and Devices Division Video Game Deferral, partially offset by the European Commission fine. The following table reconciles these financial results reported in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) to non-GAAP financial results. We have provided this non-GAAP financial information to aid investors in better understanding the company’s performance.

    Download: Web

     

    “The bold bets we made on cloud services are paying off as people increasingly choose Microsoft services including Office 365, Windows Azure, Xbox LIVE, and Skype,” said Steve Ballmer, chief executive officer at Microsoft. “While there is still work to do, we are optimistic that the bets we’ve made on Windows devices position us well for the long-term.”

    The Microsoft Business Division posted $6.32 billion of revenue, an 8% increase from the prior year period. Adjusting for the net recognition of revenue related to the Office Upgrade Offer and Pre-Sales, Microsoft Business Division non-GAAP revenue increased 5%. During the quarter, we launched the new Office, enhancing productivity and the user experience through new mobility, social, and cloud features.

    The Server & Tools business reported $5.04 billion of revenue, an 11% increase from the prior year period, driven by double-digit percentage revenue growth in SQL Server and System Center.

    “Our enterprise business continues to thrive,” said Kevin Turner, chief operating officer at Microsoft. “Enterprise customers are increasingly turning to Microsoft for their IT solutions and as a result, we continue to take share from our competitors in key areas including hybrid cloud, data platform, and virtualization.”

    The Windows Division posted revenue of $5.70 billion, a 23% increase from the prior year period. Adjusting for the recognition of revenue related to the Windows Upgrade Offer, Windows Division non-GAAP revenue was flat. During the quarter, we added to the Surface family of devices with Surface Pro.

    The Online Services Division reported revenue of $832 million, an 18% increase from the prior year period. Online advertising revenue grew 22% driven by an increase in revenue per search.

    The Entertainment and Devices Division posted revenue of $2.53 billion, an increase of 56% from the prior year period. Adjusting for the recognition of revenue related to the Video Game Deferral, the division’s non-GAAP revenue increased 33% for the third quarter. Xbox LIVE now has over 46 million members worldwide, an 18% increase from the prior year period.

    “Our diverse business continues to deliver solid financial results, even as we navigate the evolving device market,” said Peter Klein, chief financial officer at Microsoft. “Looking ahead, we will continue to invest in long-term growth opportunities to drive our devices and services strategy forward and deliver ongoing value to shareholders.”

    Business Outlook

    Adjusting for the European Commission fine, Microsoft is revising operating expense guidance downward and now offers a range of $30.2 billion to $30.5 billion for the full year ending June 30, 2013. Microsoft also offers preliminary fiscal year 2014 operating expense guidance of $31.6 billion to $32.2 billion, representing 4% to 6% growth from the mid-point of fiscal year 2013 adjusted guidance.

    CFO Transition

    The company also announced Microsoft CFO Peter Klein will leave the company at the end of the current fiscal year, after nearly four years in role and 11 years at the company. Microsoft will be naming a new CFO from its finance leadership team in the next several weeks.

    “It has been a pleasure to work with Peter as CFO,” Ballmer said. “He’s been a key member of my leadership team and a strategic advisor to me, and I wish him the very best.”

    “I’ve had a great experience as CFO and overall in my time at Microsoft,” Klein said. “We have an incredibly strong finance organization, and I’m looking forward to working with my successor on the transition through the end of the fiscal year.”

    Webcast Details

    Peter Klein, chief financial officer, Frank Brod, chief accounting officer, and Chris Suh, general manager of Investor Relations, will host a conference call and webcast at 2:30 p.m. PDT (5:30 p.m. EDT) today to discuss details of the company’s performance for the quarter and certain forward-looking information. The session may be accessed at http://www.microsoft.com/investor/ . The webcast will be available for replay through the close of business on Apr. 18, 2014.

    Adjusted Financial Results and Non-GAAP Measures

    For the third quarter fiscal year 2013, GAAP revenue, operating income, and earnings per share included the recognition of revenue for the Windows Upgrade Offer, the Office Upgrade Offer and Pre-Sales, and the Entertainment and Devices Division Video Game Deferral, partially offset by the European Commission fine. These items are defined in our Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2013. In addition to these financial results reported in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), we have provided certain non-GAAP financial information to aid investors in better understanding the company’s performance. Presenting these measures without the impact of these items gives additional insight into operational performance and helps clarify trends affecting the company’s business. For comparability of reporting, management considers this information in conjunction with GAAP amounts in evaluating business performance. These non-GAAP financial measures should not be considered as a substitute for, or superior to, the measures of financial performance prepared in accordance with GAAP.

    Non-GAAP Reconciliations

    Windows Division

     

    Download: Web

    Microsoft Business Division

    Download: Web

     

     

    Entertainment and Devices Division

    Download: Web

     

    About Microsoft

    Founded in 1975, Microsoft (Nasdaq “MSFT”) is the worldwide leader in software, services and solutions that help people and businesses realize their full potential.

    Forward-Looking Statements

    Statements in this release that are “forward-looking statements” are based on current expectations and assumptions that are subject to risks and uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially because of factors such as:

    • intense competition in all of Microsoft’s markets;
    • execution and competitive risks from our increasing focus on devices and services;
    • significant investments in new products and services that may not be profitable;
    • Microsoft’s continued ability to protect its intellectual property rights;
    • claims that Microsoft has infringed the intellectual property rights of others;
    • the possibility of unauthorized disclosure of significant portions of Microsoft’s source code;
    • cyber-attacks and security vulnerabilities in Microsoft products that could reduce revenue or lead to liability;
    • improper disclosure of personal data that could result in liability and harm to Microsoft’s reputation;
    • outages, data losses, and disruptions of our online services if we fail to maintain an adequate operations infrastructure;
    • government litigation and regulation that may limit how Microsoft designs and markets its products;
    • Microsoft’s ability to attract and retain talented employees;
    • delays in product development and related product release schedules;
    • unfavorable changes in general economic or market conditions, disruption of our partner networks or sales channels, or the availability of credit that affect demand for Microsoft’s products and services or the value of our investment portfolio;
    • adverse results in legal disputes;
    • unanticipated tax liabilities;
    • quality or supply problems in Microsoft’s consumer hardware or other vertically integrated hardware and software products;
    • impairment of goodwill or amortizable intangible assets causing a charge to earnings;
    • exposure to increased economic and regulatory uncertainties from operating a global business;
    • geopolitical conditions, natural disaster, cyber-attack or other catastrophic events disrupting Microsoft’s business; and
    • acquisitions, joint ventures, and strategic alliances that adversely affect the business.

    For further information regarding risks and uncertainties associated with Microsoft’s business, please refer to the “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and “Risk Factors” sections of Microsoft’s SEC filings, including, but not limited to, its annual report on Form 10-K and quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, copies of which may be obtained by contacting Microsoft’s Investor Relations department at (800) 285-7772 or at Microsoft’s Investor Relations website at http://www.microsoft.com/investor/.

    All information in this release is as of Apr. 18, 2013. The company undertakes no duty to update any forward-looking statement to conform the statement to actual results or changes in the company’s expectations.

  • Zynga Loses Another Exec, Shuffles Around Those That Remain

    Zynga Loses Another Exec, Shuffles Around Those That Remain

    Zynga has been bleeding talent and executives over the past few months as the company struggles to stay relevant in a changing social games environment. It doesn’t look it’s stopping anytime soon either as Zynga has announced the departure of another executive.

    The social games maker announced yesterday afternoon that CFO David Wehner is leaving the company for a finance position at Facebook. The split seems to be amicable with Zynga CEO Mark Pincus saying that Wehner “remains a good friend.”

    As for the rest of the company, Pincus seems to have used Wehner’s departure as an excuse to shuffle around management at the social games maker. A number of execs were promoted or given new responsibilities yesterday. David Ko, previously chief mobile officer, is now the chief operations officer; Barry Cottle, previously executive vice president of business and corporate development, is now the chief revenue officer; and Steven Chiang, previously executive vice president of games, is now president of the games division. As for Wehner’s now vacant position, Mark Vranesh, previously chief accounting officer, has been moved to the position of CFO.

    “Mark, David, Barry and Steve are rooted in our culture, committed to our future and part of the talented bench of leadership at Zynga,” said Pincus. “I’m confident we have the right team to deliver on our mission of connecting the world through games and position us for long-term growth.”

    The most interesting result of this corporate shuffle is the promotion of Chiang to president of games. Before coming to Zynga, Chiang was senior vice president and group general manager at EA Sports. During his time there, he oversaw the development of Madden NFL. His experience in developing successful brands could help Zynga successfully reiterate on its existing brands while developing new IPs for mobile and social.

    Zynga is not in a good place right now, and won’t be for a while. The company needs a hit, and it can’t lose any more executives. At the moment, it just looks like a bunch of people fleeing a sinking ship. The company needs to boost investor confidence, and more departures will only do the exact opposite.