WebProNews

Category: CallCenterPro

News and updates covering the call center industry.

  • Zuck Discusses Facebook Search On Earnings Call

    Zuck Discusses Facebook Search On Earnings Call

    Facebook reported its Q1 earnings on Wednesday, and while it wasn’t talked about a great deal, the subject of Facebook’s efforts in search did come up during the ensuing conference call.

    In his prepared remarks, CEO Mark Zuckerberg mentioned that Facebook is now seeing over a billion mobile searchers per day.

    The mobile search number is noteworthy for a couple of reasons. For one, Facebook only updated is mobile search functionality to reflect its efforts in desktop search in Q4. The company announced in December that it was giving users the ability to surface posts based on keywords in search, and that this would be available for desktop as well as iOS and Android.

    The second reason the amount of searches happening on mobile is significant is that this is a largely untapped opportunity for Facebook to increase its ad revenue in the long term. The more searches that happen on Facebook, the bigger opportunity this will be for the company and its advertisers.

    Zuckerberg also mentioned search as one of three ways it’s “continuing to build a new generation of Internet services that are more useful, intuitive, and immersive (with the other two ways being artificial intelligence and virtual reality platform Oculus). He said Facebook will have more to share about all of these over the coming months. That’s pretty much all he had to say about search until the audience Q&A portion of the call.

    Asked more about Facebook’s search efforts during the Q&A, Zuck said (via SeekingAlpha’s transcript of the call):

    So we’re pretty early in this whole thing and there’s so much unique content that people share in Facebook that I think that that is the clear, unique opportunity to go for first, right? I mean there’s – if you think about the overall web, there’s a lot of public content that’s out there that any web search engine can go index and provide. But a lot of what we can get at are recommendations on products and travel and restaurants and things that your friends have shared, they haven’t shared publicly, and knowing different correlations, or interesting things about what your friends are interested in, and that’s the type of stuff, those are questions that we can answer that no one else can answer, and that’s probably going to be what we continue to focus on doing first. And I think what you’re seeing is that as we enable more use cases and as we just get a lot of the basics right around performance and bringing the mobile features into parity and beyond what we’ve been able to do on desktop, the volume is growing quickly.

    I think on a recent earnings call we just announced that we passed 1 billion searches total so now being more than 1 billion on mobile shows some progress that I’m pretty proud of for the search team.

    Personalized search is no doubt an area where Facebook should be able to compete with other services. Yahoo is working on something to that effect, and apparently thinking it can make a big impact with ages-old Yahoo Mail messages. I think Facebook’s ridiculous amount of personal data has a lot more potential to make such an impact. Yahoo has been talking a lot about the value distribution partnerships. It may want to look at Facebook for some opportunities.

    One analyst asked Facebook if it Facebook expects to leverage its 2 million advertiser relationships against third-party search queries: “For example, when a user searches on, say, Yahoo! or maybe some Apple device, Facebook might tap in to advertisers to provide relevant sponsored results.”

    COO Sheryl Sandberg simply stated that the company has no plans to work with marketers in such a way.

    On the company’s previous earnings call, Zuckerberg noted that its recent search changes at resulted in indexing a trillion posts. And that was a quarter ago.

    You can read more about what Zuckerberg has said about search in the past here.

    Images via Facebook

  • Scott Disick: Kris Jenner Calls Him A-Hole In Vegas

    Scott Disick: Kris Jenner Calls Him A-Hole In Vegas

    Scott Disick, in previews for Sunday’s episode of Keeping Up with the Kardashians, proved beyond a shadow of a doubt that he is absolutely off the wagon.

    In a wild Vegas romp, which was meant to be a birthday celebration for Kris Jenner, Scott Disick acted a complete fool and was clearly sauced before the party even started.

    Scott Disick was the one who set up the appearance for Kris Jenner, but for most of the day he was missing.

    But, it becomes quite apparent what he has been doing all day when Scott Disick shows up as Kris is having dinner with her friends and her boyfriend.

    It doesn’t seem to go well for Scott Disick and Kris Jenner for the rest of the night.

    “I’m liking @310Nutrition. You can get a #310shake sample and free shaker cup like this one at www.Try310Shake.com.”

    A photo posted by Scott Disick (@letthelordbewithyou) on

    Scott Disick tells Kris Jenner she has to do a strip-tease at her appearance.

    Then Scott Disick appears to have a weird, drunken conversation with French Montana.

    And the night leads, somehow, to Scott Disick suggesting that Kris is flirting with him.

    Scott Disick eventually sprays champagne all over Kris Jenner, which is when she calls him an a–hole.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p62dBhi7zA0

    Kris reportedly said to Scott Disick, “F—ing a–hole! What the f— are you doing? You f—ing hit me in the head.”

    It doesn’t look too good for Scott Disick when Kris reported the goings-on to his very pregnant girlfriend, Kourtney.

    Love this sweater for some reason

    A photo posted by Scott Disick (@letthelordbewithyou) on

    Kourtney revealed to Kris, “I heard him come home. It’s just like, are you drinking again? It’s obvious, it’s not a question.”

    Kourtney seemed very disappointed in her Scott Disick’s behavior. She said, “He’s not trying, he’s a d-ck…he’s literally schizophrenic.”

    What do you think about Scott Disick’s behavior on the upcoming episode of Keeping Up with the Kardashians?

    Will you be watching?

  • Amber Rose Professes Love for Wiz Khalifa, Calls Him ‘the Love of My Life,’ Shares Suggestive Photo

    Amber Rose Professes Love for Wiz Khalifa, Calls Him ‘the Love of My Life,’ Shares Suggestive Photo

    Amber Rose, known for her mostly nude Instagram pictures that display her ample curves, seems to be truly burying the hatchet with her ex-husband Wiz Khalifa. In fact, in a recent post, she professes her love for the father of her two-year-old son, Sebastian.

    Rose even alluded to her desire to reconcile with the rapper.

    “We went wrong somewhere and even if we never ever get back together (Even tho I pray, dream and hope we do) he will forever be the love of my life,” Amber Rose captioned an Instagram photo.

    “We forever have a bond because we made a beautiful baby from our love. Through all the ups and downs of our relationship my heart still beats for him every single day. I’m sick of putting on a front like I’m happy without him. I’m not. He makes me happy. He’s the only one who can.”

    Can Amber Rose post a photo that isn’t highly suggestive–even when she’s sharing the deepest thoughts?

    No.

    A photo posted by Amber Rose (@amberrose) on

    It was back in March when Amber Rose seemingly made peace with Wiz Khalifa regarding the couple’s son. Khalifa asked her to listen to the lyrics of his new song from the Furious 7 soundtrack, and those lyrics clearly hit a nerve.

    “How could we not talk about family when family’s all that we got? / Everything I went through you were standing there by my side / And now you gonna be with me for the last ride”

    Do you think a reconciliation is in the future cards for Amber Rose and Wiz Khalifa? How long can he go on seeing all those sexy photos she shares without claiming her for his own?

    A photo posted by Amber Rose (@amberrose) on

  • Catelynn Lowell Shares ‘Teen Mom OG’ Gender Reveal, Called Trailer Trash by Farrah Abraham

    Catelynn Lowell Shares ‘Teen Mom OG’ Gender Reveal, Called Trailer Trash by Farrah Abraham

    Catelynn Lowell had some good moments and some bad ones on this past weekend’s episode of Teen Mom OG. The good was her gender reveal, when she and Tyler Baltierra learned what most had suspected all along–that they were having a baby girl.

    You’ll recall that Catelynn Lowell and her boyfriend gave up their first baby girl–Carly–for adoption, deciding at the time that they simply weren’t mature enough to raise a child. The two have weathered many storms since then, are now engaged, and expecting their second chance at parenthood–at least on the show.

    In reality, Catelynn Lowell and Tyler Baltierra have already welcomed their new bundle of joy.

    A video posted by Catelynn Lowell (@catelynnmtv) on

    Even though Farrah Abraham has yet to appear on an episode of Teen Mom OG (so far the show has featured Catelynn Lowell, Amber Portwood, and Maci Bookout), she has managed to get in some hurtful digs from backstage. Probably the most insulting remark she made was aimed at Catelynn Lowell.

    The jab took place as Catelynn Lowell was speaking with the show’s host about ending her ongoing feud with Abraham. That’s when the former porn star dug her nails in deep.

    “There’s somebody still in denial,” she said to the show’s producers, snickering over her remark. “Still in denial land of white trash!”

    That wasn’t the end of her derogatory comments either. At least they weren’t all directed at Catelynn Lowell.

    “From the past I never initially got along with the girls. They had some other issues with myself from the get-go…I would never confide in them,” Farrah Abraham said.

    “Would I ever confide in people who are very fake and not real with themselves and kind of in denial and can’t empathize with someone? Of course not!” the erotic novelist continued.

    “She just burned bridges with everybody. What an idiot,” Amber Portwood said as she, Catelynn Lowell, and Maci Bookout simply shook their heads in disbelief at what they were hearing Farrah Abraham say.

    Fortunately for Catelynn, she knows what Farrah is all about. It would likely have stung far worse had Maci or Amber made a rude comment about her.

    This is no doubt a clear indication of what future episodes of Teen Mom OG will entail–and they’re likely to get even worse when Farrah Abraham starts appearing in them.

  • Yelp Documentary Puts Out Call For Stories From Businesses

    Yelp Documentary Puts Out Call For Stories From Businesses

    Yelp documentary-in-the-making Billion Dollar Bully met its Kickstarter funding goal on Friday after generating a fair amount of exposure in the media, most notably with a back-and-forth between filmmaker Kaylie Milliken and Yelp VP of Corporate Communications Shannon Eis on CNBC.

    So far, the film has raised over $64,000 from 534 backers, and continues to seek additional funding to cover graphic art, marketing, principal photography, and contract wok.

    The film was already about half shot before the Kickstarter campaign launched, but Milliken is seeking additional stories from business owners about their Yelp experiences, and has set up a new point of contact to get them. A post on the production company’s blog says:

    The support for this project so far has been amazing. This topic has effected so many people, and we have been getting emails from so many wanting to tell us their story. This kind of response lets us truly realize the impact that we can have by bringing this story to life.

    We have setup a new email address to send all your stories too. This will help us gather your stories, and make sure that we don’t miss hearing what you have to say.

    Please send your stories to [email protected]

    Considering how frequently businesses claim to have their own stories in the comment sections of our own coverage of Yelp, I’m guessing the inbox will be flooded.

    An update on the Kickstarter page made over the weekend promises the creation of new rewards for stretch goals.

    “Window stickers and t-shirts have been requested by several people, so we will be incorporating that,” it says. “We are just so thrilled at the way this project has taken off! It really wouldn’t be happening without the support from all of you.”

    It remains to be seen whether or not Billion Dollar Bully will be able to show us any hard hitting evidence to back up the claims many people have made, but if nothing else, it will give these people a new format to share their stories beyond random Internet comments.

    Milliken has said she hasn’t been able to get Yelp to agree to go on camera for the film, but that she hopes they do. Yelp continues to point to a Harvard Business School study, the dismissal of lawsuits, and a recently concluded FTC investigation, which it says debunks the claims at hand. The documentary will be exploring these things, according to Milliken. Yelp says she has a conflict of interest.

    For more on the project and what Yelp has had to say about it, read our interview with Milliken and our follow-up from after the above CNBC exchange.

    Image via YouTube

  • Sarah Michelle Gellar, Freddie Prinze, Jr. Call Themselves ‘Party Animals’

    Sarah Michelle Gellar, Freddie Prinze, Jr. Call Themselves ‘Party Animals’

    Sarah Michelle Gellar and her handsome hubby Freddie Prinze, Jr. enjoyed a date night recently–one for adults only, too. The parents of two are like any other couple–they need time out sans the kids.

    It was during this date when Sarah Michelle Gellar started snapping selfies of her with her husband, and the result is adorable.

    “Sometimes even parents need a #DateNight Up past ten pm #PartyAnimals Married almost 13 years and still enjoying each other’s company,” the former Buffy the Vampire Slayer star wrote.

    You have to admit they look pretty happy together–even after 13 years.

    A photo posted by Sarah Michelle (@sarahmgellar) on

    It was only about three weeks ago when Sarah Michelle Gellar shared another selfie with her Instagram followers. This one was while the two were celebrating Freddie Prinze, Jr.’s birthday.

    “Happy birthday to this guy @RealFPJ Thank you for showing me dreams are possible, and being the best partner a girl could ever have (esp on #InternationalWomensDay),” she captioned this shot.

    It definitely appears as though the years have been kind to Sarah Michelle Gellar and Freddie Prinze, Jr. All too often, Hollywood couples get wrapped up in appearances and all the glitz and glamour hype. These two seem to have stayed quite grounded. They’re even very involved in teaching their kids to help those less fortunate than themselves.

    “We’ve been getting the kids at my daughter’s pre-school involved in things and now one by one, they’ve all stopped asking for presents at birthday parties and they all want to do different donations, whether it’s canned food or baby diapers and wipes,” she revealed.

    “I didn’t have much growing up, so I’m in a fortunate position where I can provide my daughter with dolls or toys, whatever that thing is. But to see her really want to give back for those other children is the best gift as a mom that I could ever receive.”

    Kudos to Sarah Michelle Gellar and Freddie Prinze, Jr. on the grounded life they’re living with their children–and on being ‘party animals’ from time to time.

  • 29% Of Millennials Can’t Recall Last Time They Read A Newspaper

    29% Of Millennials Can’t Recall Last Time They Read A Newspaper

    Last week, a study from the Media Insight Project came out finding that millennials have little interest in paying for news. Now, Retale has some new findings based on a poll of over 1,000 people, looking at newspaper readership, format preferences, and attitude toward paying for content.

    According to that, only 19% of millennials have paid for newspaper content (print or digital) in the last month, while 50% of all age groups are completely unwilling to pay for print. Millennials are the least willing at 55%.

    In fact, 29% of all millennials said that they couldn’t even recall the last time they read a print newspaper.

    “Millennials are a digital-first audience,” said Retale President Pat Dermody. “They’re not consuming print newspaper content in the same way as previous generations. For the industry to adapt, they’ll have to be creative and consider new digital formats to support readership and drive revenue.”

    67% of all age groups were against paying for digital news access while 50% were unwilling for print. About 60% of all millennials said they’re not willing to pay anything for digital news access.

    According to the study, 27% of millennials prefer a Netflix-like, “all-you-can-eat” payment structure for digital news. It also dound that 76% of those 55 and older are completely unwilling to pay anything for digital news access. Millennials prefer to access digital content via mobile browser (37%) vs. PC (35%).

    Here’s what the numbers look like for paying for digital news:

    85% of respondents who choose to get their news digitally cited cost as a key factor. 59% cited convenience, and surprisingly only 39% cited more up-to-date content. For print, 49% cited familiarity, while 37% said the experience is less distracting than a website. 36% cited convenience, and 27% cited perceived credibility of content.

    For those few millennials who do prefer print content, 31% cited credibility compared to 26% citing convenience. For those 35 and over, 39% cited convenience over 26% for credibility.

    When it comes to receiving and redeeming deals and retail promotions, 40% of millennials prefer digital, and this is the largest group that does. 52% of those 35 and over prefer print.

    “Retail circulars have long been one of the most effective marketing tools in retail marketing,” said Dermody. “However, broader trends in media consumption, with readers migrating from print to digital, can’t be ignored. In digitizing print circulars, retailers can navigate the evolving landscape and preserve a proven marketing strategy. They can also better connect with this new and growing group of mobile, millennial shoppers.”

    Image via Thinkstock

  • Flash Continues To Die As Google Automatically Converts Ads

    Flash Continues To Die As Google Automatically Converts Ads

    Google announced on Wednesday that it will start converting all Flash ads to HTML5 automatically. The company presents this as an opportunity for advertisers to access more inventory.

    In a post on Google+, Google says, “Over half of time spent online is now spent on mobile devices. This presents a tremendous opportunity for marketers to reach their customers throughout the day, whenever they may be browsing. But there is an all-too-common barrier: many mobile devices and some browsers do not currently support Flash. That’s why we’re introducing a way to automatically convert Flash ads to HTML5, giving advertisers better access to the portion of Google Display Network inventory that is HTML5-only.”

    Last fall, Google announced interactive HTML5 backup tools for when Flash isn’t supported for both the Google Display Network and DoubleClick Campaign Manager. These tools would automatically create HTML5 versions of Flash ads, and when they’re served on devices or browsers that don’t support Flash, they show the interactive HTML5 ad instead of a static image backup.

    Now, Google says, “Eligible Flash campaigns, both existing and new, will now be automatically converted to HTML5 when uploaded through AdWords, AdWords Editor, and many 3rd party tools. “With this new tool plus our best practices and versatile mobile ad formats, we’re making it easier for marketers to deliver beautiful display ads that just work — regardless of screen or device — ensuring a better experience for both consumers and brands.”

    As Google notes in its help center, not all Flash ads can be converted to HTML5. The company recommends uploading your ad to the Swiffy tool to see if it will convert. If the tool can convert it, it will be automatically converted when it’s uploaded to AdWords.

    You can also see in your AdWords reports whether it was converted. Just segment the ad table by devices. If you see mobile or tablet impressions for a Flash ad, it was converted.

    Google says that in late 2015 it will begin providing a notification on all converted Flash ads.

    Google doesn’t allow Flash ads that don’t support the clickTAG variable, which is the tracking code Google assigns an individual ad and allows it to register where the ad was displayed when ti was clicked. It says that on any click, the ads should redirect to the URL specified in the clickTAG argument, and there should be any other redirection in between. Note that the variable name has to be spelled exactly like “clickTAG” with the upper-case TAG and no space.

    Google mentioned “best practices”. It refers to a document called Smart Phone Tips: An Advertiser’s Checklist for Getting Mobile Right. This provides guidance on mobile creatives and extensions, mobile targeting, mobile measurement, mobile bidding, and working without mobile-optimized sites.

    Google has been doing everything it can to help phase out Flash for years. This is only the latest nail in its coffin. Last month, the company announced that it is now defaulting to the HTML5 player on the web for YouTube embeds, moving to iframes. Additionally, it announced the deprecation of the old style of Flash <object> embeds and Flash API.

    Image via Adobe

  • Google Adds Call-Only Campaigns To AdWords

    Google Adds Call-Only Campaigns To AdWords

    Google announced the launch of new call-only campaigns for AdWords. These let businesses reach customers by prominently showing their phone number, business description, and a call button on the search results page.

    “People are living their lives online and engaging with your business in new ways,” says AdWords product manager Amit Agarwal. “With smartphones in hand, consumers are increasingly looking for products or services while on the go and then placing a call right away. In fact, 70% of mobile searchers call a business directly from search results.”

    “Call-only campaigns are specially designed to only show on mobile devices that can make phone calls,” he says. “This means every click you pay for can be a phone call to your business.”

    As Google notes, advertisers can simply form their bid strategies based on CPA or ROAS goals for calls as every click goes toward a phone call. The company recommends tailoring ads for calls with language like “speak to a specialist today” or “call to make an appointment”.

    Recent research from BrightLocal found that phone calls are the success metric small to midsize businesses are most concerned with.

    Image via Google

  • Amber Rose: Wiz Khalifa Calls Her ‘Foul Creature’

    Amber Rose: Wiz Khalifa Calls Her ‘Foul Creature’

    Amber Rose is a ‘foul creature,’ at least according to her ex, Wiz Khalifa. Rose filed for divorce from Khalifa back in 2014, and the two have a two-year-old son named Sebastian.

    It seems like visitation issues may be the reason Khalifa dissed his ex-wife in this way. A series of tweets from Wiz Khalifa no doubt means that some bitterness between the two definitely exists.

    The first tweet is a bit disturbing, as it indicates Amber Rose ‘did something’ to their son.

    The subsequent tweets portray Khalifa with a calmer demeanor. Hopefully all is well with little Sebastian.

    If you note the time of day on the first and second tweets, it seems only minutes went by before Wiz Khalifa settled down a bit.

    That’s about all the information anyone has at this point about whatever Amber Rose did to warrant being called a ‘foul creature.’

    The last time Amber Rose made news, it was for some Instagram photos she posted wearing practically nothing.

    A photo posted by Amber Rose (@amberrose) on

    It will be interesting to learn if more hits the media about whatever set off Wiz Khalifa and made him resort to name calling with Amber Rose. In the meantime, couples in the throes of visitation or custody issues can file ‘foul creature’ in their arsenal of vile phrases, and pull it out when their stress hits unthinkable levels.

  • Google Shows Call-To-Action Links For Quick Answer Results From Third-Party Sites

    Google Shows Call-To-Action Links For Quick Answer Results From Third-Party Sites

    Back in November, people started noticing that Google was showing call-to-action link for some of its quick answer results. The only examples anyone produced at the time came from Google’s own pages.

    For example, “adwords negative keywords” showed some info drawn from a Google support page, and included a link to “Show me how.”

    Another example was for the query “open gmail account,” which did the same thing, but included a link saying “Go to Account Creation”.

    Most queries in which Google pulls info from a third-party site simply include more generic source links:

    Now, as Search Engine Land points out, Google is showing the call-to-action style links for some third-party sites. For example, search “quickbooks install,” and you’ll see a WordPress answer box with a link that says, “Go to download.”

    A query for “wordpress download” presents a similar result. As SEL also notes, a query for “love quotes” also brings up a similar answer box with a call-to-action link “Try Again.” Hitting that will simply bring up another quote.

    It’s still unclear how and when Google decides to show call-to-action links for these types of results. Perhaps at some point they’ll give webmasters the ability to tell them what they want to appear for their content.

    Google recently asked webmasters what kinds of things they’d like to see added to Webmaster Tools in 2015. So far, 976 people have submitted 319 suggestions and cast 5,509 votes.

    Images via Google

  • Tara Lipinksi And Johnny Weir Called The Super Bowl Winner

    Tara Lipinksi And Johnny Weir Called The Super Bowl Winner

    Tara Lipinski and Johnny Weir got a lot of people talking with their coverage of the Olympics in Sochi, so it was a no-brainer to put them together again on television for coverage of the Super Bowl. Even better than their outfits and onscreen chemistry, however, was the fact that they chose the winning team based on one factor: hotness.

    “We’re rooting for Rob Gronkowski. We got to interview him. He was so nice, and we fell in love. We’re rooting for him specifically, and he just happens to play for the Patriots,” Lipinski told Entertainment Tonight.

    “We watched a couple of his YouTube play moments. We don’t understand anything. We just think he’s a big, hot dude,” Weir added.

    Tara Lipinski posted several photos and videos on Instagram while she and Weir were in Phoenix and it certainly looked like they were having as much fun as humanly possible. The longtime friends were also excited that Katy Perry was the halftime show performer, as they kept her on repeat when they were in Sochi.

    “We listened to Katy Perry’s ‘Dark Horse’ on repeat at Sochi. That was our pre-game song in the makeup trailer. We’d make sure the makeup girls would turn it on, and we’d listen to it every day. It’s just right that at our next event together, Katy Perry would be there,” Tara Lipinski said.

    Tackle practice @johnnygweir

    A video posted by Tara Lipinski (@taralipinski) on

    Game Day #SuperBowlXLIX @johnnygweir

    A photo posted by Tara Lipinski (@taralipinski) on

    The time is nearing #SuperBowlSunday

    A photo posted by Tara Lipinski (@taralipinski) on

    Lipinski said before the game that while she and Weir didn’t know much about football, it didn’t matter when it came to enjoying the Super Bowl.

    “When you’re as good as these teams are, and when you’re prepared and ready to compete as an athlete, the hardest part is just letting go and staying out of your mind. But these teams are so talented, and that’s why it’s going to be so good to watch them brawl,” Tara Lipinski said.

  • Google Responds To Yahoo’s Firefox Deal On Earnings Call

    Google Responds To Yahoo’s Firefox Deal On Earnings Call

    Google released its Q4 and fiscal year 2014 financial results on Thursday with full year revenue up 19% year-over-year at $66 billion and revenue of $18.1 billion for the quarter, which was a 15% year-over-year increase.

    During the company’s conference call, CFO and Senior Vice President Patrick Pichette was asked about the impact of Yahoo’s deal with Mozilla to replace Google as the default search experience in the Firefox browser. here’s what he had to say (via Seeking Alpha’s transcript):

    You’ve all heard the announcements about Mozilla. And so when we don’t comment on the details of any of our partnerships that we have, having said that, we continue to do two things that really matter. One is our users continue to actually go in, if they love Google, they will continue to find Google, whichever platform, whichever browser, and that’s really what we’ve focused on doing.

    And then the second piece is the way to win this in the long-term, right? It’s very simple. You just make wonderful products. And when you make wonderful products that are magical people will find them.

    And so that’s the strategy that we’re using and we just don’t comment on any of our – we’ve never commented on any of our deals, so we want comment on Mozilla either.

    The subject came up again a bit later in the call, and Pichette had a little more to say:

    So on the issue of partnerships, Google has a lot of partnerships, right, it’s got – it’s an anchor of our strategy, because that actually gives us distribution, distribution is good. And so we also we look for partnerships in many spaces.

    Partnerships have to be win-wins, and in that sense, right, we’ll always look for those combinations. But also at the end of the day, there’s a second piece of the strategy, which is, as I said earlier, building amazing product, because if you build the amazing products then people want to distribute you product.

    And so that’s why, we have a meet in the whole search team that actually do this amazing job through the knowledge graph and all of the other elements of search, and no matter what the device, no matter the location, no matter the time of day. If we give you the answer as you’re looking for and 10 clicks less than it was before and then even faster and better all the time, that’s what wins, and that’s the core of what we’re focused on, and then people will find the way to get the Google.

    So, yes, partnerships matter. But at the core of it, you need partnership, because you have a phenomenal product. And that’s what we’re going to continue to build this amazing company.

    Google has already been showing concern about losing Mozilla. It definitely matters. Google has been trying to get people to switch back with messages like this:

    And one on the Google homepage in the Firefox browser, which says, “Get to Google faster. Make Google your default engine.”

    Yahoo also reported its earnings this week, and Mayer talked more about her company’s deal with Mozilla. She appears to be quite excited about it, and is clearly thirsty for a similar partnership with Apple to replace Google as the default experience in Safari. Whether or not that happens remains to be seen. Microsoft and Google both want that too.

    Last week, Merkle | RKG released its Digital Marketing Report for Q4 2014, which looked at the impact of the Yahoo/Mozilla deal on paid search.

    “We’re now able to assess the impact of the deal on Yahoo’s share of Firefox paid search traffic, which grew from 12% at the beginning of December to 30% by the end of the year,” the report said. “However, digging deeper reveals that Yahoo’s share of Firefox 34 paid clicks has been in decline ever since the first big wave of updates in the second week of December. While the initial rollout saw Yahoo’s share rise to a peak of 43% on December 10th, that figure was just 36% by December’s end.”

    “This is primarily the result of users switching the default search engine of their browsers back to Google, as shown by the corresponding increase in Google’s share of Firefox 34 paid clicks throughout the month of December,” it added. “All in all, it appears the deal will move about 2% or less of total paid search traffic from Google to Yahoo. This is far less than the 10%+ of paid traffic that stands to be on the table if Safari default search were to change hands, which news outlets have reported is a possibility in 2015.”

    According to that report, Bing and Yahoo outpaced Google in paid search growth, not only because of the Yahoo Firefox deal, but also rapid growth from Bing Product Ads.

    Here’s Google’s full earnings release:

    MOUNTAIN VIEW, Calif. – January 29, 2015 –  Google Inc. (NASDAQ: GOOG, GOOGL) today announced financial results for the quarter and fiscal year ended December 31, 2014.

    “Google’s full year revenue for 2014 was $66 billion, up 19% year on year,” said Patrick Pichette, CFO of Google, “and this quarter, our revenue was $18.1 billion, despite strong currency headwinds.”

    Q4 Financial Summary

    Google Inc. reported consolidated revenues of $18.10 billion for the quarter ended December 31, 2014, an increase of 15% compared to the fourth quarter of 2013. Google Inc. reports advertising revenues, consistent with GAAP, on a gross basis without deducting traffic acquisition costs (TAC). In the fourth quarter of 2014, TAC totaled $3.62 billion, or 22% of advertising revenues.

    Operating income, operating margin, net income, and earnings per share (EPS) are reported on a GAAP and non-GAAP basis. The non-GAAP measures, as well as free cash flow, an alternative non-GAAP measure of liquidity, are described below and are reconciled to the corresponding GAAP measures at the end of this release.

    • GAAP operating income in the fourth quarter of 2014 was $4.40 billion, or 24% of revenues. This compares to GAAP operating income of $4.43 billion, or 28% of revenues, in the fourth quarter of 2013. Non-GAAP operating income in the fourth quarter of 2014 was $5.60 billion, or 31% of revenues. This compares to non-GAAP operating income of $5.30 billion, or 34% of revenues, in the fourth quarter of 2013.
    • GAAP net income (including net income (loss) from discontinued operations) in the fourth quarter of 2014 was $4.76 billion, compared to $3.38 billion in the fourth quarter of 2013. Non-GAAP net income in the fourth quarter of 2014 was $4.74 billion, compared to $4.57 billion in the fourth quarter of 2013.
    • GAAP EPS (including impact from net income (loss) from discontinued operations) in the fourth quarter of 2014 was $6.91 on 688 million diluted shares outstanding, compared to $4.95 in the fourth quarter of 2013 on 682 million diluted shares outstanding. Non-GAAP EPS in the fourth quarter of 2014 was $6.88, compared to $6.70 in the fourth quarter of 2013.
    • Non-GAAP operating income and non-GAAP operating margin exclude stock-based compensation (SBC) expense from continuing operations. Non-GAAP net income and non-GAAP EPS exclude SBC expense from continuing operations, net of the related tax benefits, as well as net income (loss) from discontinued operations.
    • In the fourth quarter of 2014, the expense related to SBC from continuing operations and the related tax benefits were $1,201 million and $255 million compared to $873 million and $184 million in the fourth quarter of 2013. In addition, net income from discontinued operations in the fourth quarter of 2014 was $967 million, compared to a net loss of $506 million in the fourth quarter of 2013.

    On October 29, 2014, we closed the sale of Motorola Mobile business. Financial results of Motorola Mobile are presented as Net income (loss) from discontinued operations on the Consolidated Statements of Income for the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2013 and 2014 through the date of sale.  The sale resulted in a gain of $740 million, net of tax, which was included in Net income (loss) from discontinued operations on the Consolidated Statements of Income for the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2014.  All references to results of our operations have been retroactively restated for all prior periods to exclude the results from Motorola Mobile.

    On April 2, 2014, we issued shares of Class C capital stock as a dividend to our stockholders. Except for the number of authorized shares and par value, all references to share and per share amounts have been retroactively restated for all prior periods shown to reflect the stock split, which was effected in the form of a stock dividend.

    Q4 Financial Highlights

    Revenues and Monetization – Google Inc. revenues for the quarter ended December 31, 2014 were $18.10 billion, representing a 15% increase over fourth quarter of 2013 revenues of $15.71 billion.

    Sites Revenues – Our sites generated revenues of $12.43 billion, or 69% of total revenues, in the fourth quarter of 2014. This represents an 18% increase over fourth quarter 2013 sites revenues of $10.54 billion.

    Network Revenues – Our partner sites generated revenues of $3.72 billion, or 20% of total revenues, in the fourth quarter of 2014.   This represents a 6% increase over fourth quarter 2013 network revenues of $3.52 billion.

    Other Revenues – Other revenues were $1.95 billion, or 11% of total revenues, in the fourth quarter of 2014.  This represents a 19% increase over fourth quarter 2013 other revenues of $1.65 billion.

    International Revenues – Our revenues from outside of the United States totaled $10.23 billion, representing 56% of total revenues in the fourth quarter of 2014, compared to 58% in the third quarter of 2014 and 56% in the fourth quarter of 2013. Our revenues from the United Kingdom totaled $1.66 billion, representing 9% of total revenues in the fourth quarter of 2014, compared to 10% in the fourth quarter of 2013.

    Foreign Exchange Impact on Revenues – Excluding gains related to our foreign exchange risk management program, had foreign exchange rates remained constant from the third quarter of 2014 through the fourth quarter of 2014, our revenues in the fourth quarter of 2014 would have been $541 million higher. Excluding gains related to our foreign exchange risk management program, had foreign exchange rates remained constant from the fourth quarter of 2013 through the fourth quarter of 2014, our revenues in the fourth quarter of 2014 would have been $616 million higher. In the fourth quarter of 2014, we recognized a benefit of $148 million to revenues through our foreign exchange risk management program, compared to $3 million in the fourth quarter of 2013.

    Reconciliations of our non-GAAP international revenues excluding the impact of foreign exchange and hedging to GAAP international revenues are included at the end of this release.

    Paid Clicks – Aggregate paid clicks, which include clicks related to ads served on Google sites and the sites of our Network members, increased approximately 14% over the fourth quarter of 2013 and increased approximately 11% over the third quarter of 2014. Sites paid clicks, which include clicks related to ads we serve on Google owned and operated properties across different geographies and devices including search, YouTube engagement ads like TrueView, and other owned and operated properties including Maps and Finance, increased approximately 25% over the fourth quarter of 2013 and increased approximately 18% over the third quarter of 2014. Network paid clicks, which include clicks related to ads served on non-Google properties participating in our AdSense for Search, AdSense for Content, and AdMob businesses, decreased approximately 11% over the fourth quarter of 2013 and decreased approximately 7% over the third quarter of 2014.

    Cost-Per-Click – Average cost-per-click, which includes clicks related to ads served on Google sites and the sites of our Network members, decreased approximately 3% over the fourth quarter of 2013 and decreased approximately 3% over the third quarter of 2014. Cost-per-click for Google sites decreased approximately 8% over the fourth quarter of 2013 and decreased approximately 8% over the third quarter of 2014. Network cost-per-click increased approximately 6% over the fourth quarter of 2013 and increased approximately 10% over the third quarter of 2014.

    Traffic Acquisition Costs – Traffic acquisition costs (TAC), the portion of revenues shared with Google’s partners, increased to $3.62 billion in the fourth quarter of 2014, compared to $3.31 billion in the fourth quarter of 2013. TAC as a percentage of advertising revenues was 22% in the fourth quarter of 2014, compared to 24% in the fourth quarter of 2013.

    The majority of TAC is related to amounts ultimately paid to our Network members, which totaled $2.66 billion in the fourth quarter of 2014. TAC also includes amounts paid to our distribution partners who distribute our browser or otherwise direct search queries to our website, which totaled $968 million in the fourth quarter of 2014.

    Other Cost of Revenues – Other cost of revenues, which is comprised primarily of data center operational expenses, content acquisition costs,  revenue share payments to mobile carriers and original equipment manufacturers, and hardware inventory costs, increased to $3.30 billion, or 18% of revenues, in the fourth quarter of 2014, compared to $2.94 billion, or 19% of revenues, in the fourth quarter of 2013.

    Operating Expenses – Operating expenses, other than cost of revenues, were $6.78 billion in the fourth quarter of 2014, or 37% of revenues, compared to $5.03 billion in the fourth quarter of 2013, or 32% of revenues.

    Depreciation and Loss on Disposal of Property and Equipment and Amortization Expenses – Depreciation and loss on disposal of property and equipment and amortization and impairment of intangibles and other assets were $1.27 billion for the fourth quarter of 2014, compared to $1.04 billion for the fourth quarter of 2013.

    Stock-Based Compensation (SBC) – In the fourth quarter of 2014, the total charge related to SBC from continuing operations was $1,201 million, compared to $873 million in the fourth quarter of 2013. We currently estimate SBC charges for grants made to employees prior to December 31, 2014 to be approximately $4.30 billion for 2015. This estimate does not include expenses to be recognized related to employee stock awards that are granted after December 31, 2014.

    Operating Income – GAAP operating income in the fourth quarter of 2014 was $4.40 billion, or 24% of revenues. This compares to GAAP operating income of $4.43 billion, or 28% of revenues, in the fourth quarter of 2013. Non-GAAP operating income in the fourth quarter of 2014 was $5.60 billion, or 31% of revenues. This compares to non-GAAP operating income of $5.30 billion, or 34% of revenues, in the fourth quarter of 2013.

    Interest and Other Income, Net – Interest and other income, net, was $128 million in the fourth quarter of 2014, compared to $112 million in the fourth quarter of 2013.

    Income Taxes – Our effective tax rate was 16% for the fourth quarter of 2014.

    Net Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations – Net income from discontinued operations in the fourth quarter of 2014 was $967 million, compared to a net loss of $506 million in the fourth quarter of 2013. Net income from discontinued operations in the fourth quarter of 2014 includes a gain of $740 million, net of tax, from the sale of Motorola Mobile business.

    Net Income – GAAP consolidated net income in the fourth quarter of 2014 was $4.76 billion, compared to $3.38 billion in the fourth quarter of 2013. Non-GAAP consolidated net income was $4.74 billion in the fourth quarter of 2014, compared to $4.57 billion in the fourth quarter of 2013. GAAP EPS in the fourth quarter of 2014 was $6.91 on 688 million diluted shares outstanding, compared to $4.95 in the fourth quarter of 2013 on 682 million diluted shares outstanding. Non-GAAP EPS in the fourth quarter of 2014 was $6.88, compared to $6.70 in the fourth quarter of 2013.

    Cash Flow and Capital Expenditures – Net cash provided by operating activities in the fourth quarter of 2014 totaled $6.36 billion, compared to $5.24 billion in the fourth quarter of 2013. In the fourth quarter of 2014, capital expenditures were $3.55 billion, the majority of which was for real estate purchases, production equipment, and data center construction. Free cash flow, an alternative non-GAAP measure of liquidity, is defined as net cash provided by operating activities less capital expenditures. In the fourth quarter of 2014, free cash flow was $2.81 billion compared to $2.98 billion in the fourth quarter of 2013.

    We expect to continue to make significant capital expenditures.

    A reconciliation of free cash flow to net cash provided by operating activities, the GAAP measure of liquidity, is included at the end of this release.

    Cash – As of December 31, 2014, cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities were $64.40 billion.

    Headcount – On a worldwide basis, we employed 53,600 full-time employees as of December 31, 2014, compared to 51,564 full-time employees as of September 30, 2014.

    WEBCAST AND CONFERENCE CALL INFORMATION

    A live audio webcast of Google’s fourth quarter and fiscal year 2014 earnings release call will be available at http://investor.google.com/webcast.html. The call begins today at 1:30 PM (PT) / 4:30 PM (ET). This press release, the financial tables, as well as other supplemental information including the reconciliations of certain non-GAAP measures to their nearest comparable GAAP measures, are also available on that site.

    We also announce investor information, including news and commentary about our business and financial performance, SEC filings, notices of investor events and our press and earnings releases, on our investor relations website (http://investor.google.com) and our investor relations Google+ page (https://plus.google.com/+GoogleInvestorRelations/posts).

    FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

    This press release contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. These statements include statements regarding our investments in areas of strategic focus, our expected SBC charges, and our plans to make significant capital expenditures. Actual results may differ materially from the results predicted, and reported results should not be considered as an indication of future performance. The potential risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ from the results predicted include, among others, unforeseen changes in our hiring patterns and our need to expend capital to accommodate the growth of the business, as well as those risks and uncertainties included under the captions “Risk Factors” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013  and our most recent Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2014, which are on file with the SEC and are available on our investor relations website at investor.google.com and on the SEC website at www.sec.gov. Additional information will also be set forth in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014.  All information provided in this release and in the attachments is as of January 29, 2015, and we undertake no duty to update this information unless required by law.

    ABOUT NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES

    To supplement our consolidated financial statements, which are prepared and presented in accordance with GAAP, we use the following non-GAAP financial measures: non-GAAP operating income, non-GAAP operating margin, non-GAAP net income, non-GAAP EPS, free cash flow, and non-GAAP international revenues. The presentation of this financial information is not intended to be considered in isolation or as a substitute for, or superior to, the financial information prepared and presented in accordance with GAAP. For more information on these non-GAAP financial measures, please see the tables captioned “Reconciliations of non-GAAP results of operations to the nearest comparable GAAP measures,” “Reconciliation from net cash provided by operating activities to free cash flow,” and “Reconciliation from GAAP international revenues to non-GAAP international revenues” included at the end of this release.

    We use these non-GAAP financial measures for financial and operational decision-making and as a means to evaluate period-to-period comparisons. Our management believes that these non-GAAP financial measures provide meaningful supplemental information regarding our performance and liquidity by excluding certain expenses and expenditures that may not be indicative of our recurring core business operating results, meaning our operating performance excluding not only non-cash charges, such as SBC, but also discrete cash charges that are infrequent in nature. We believe that both management and investors benefit from referring to these non-GAAP financial measures in assessing our performance and when planning, forecasting, and analyzing future periods. These non-GAAP financial measures also facilitate management’s internal comparisons to our historical performance and liquidity as well as comparisons to our competitors’ operating results. We believe these non-GAAP financial measures are useful to investors both because (1) they allow for greater transparency with respect to key metrics used by management in its financial and operational decision-making and (2) they are used by our institutional investors and the analyst community to help them analyze the health of our business.

    Non-GAAP operating income and operating margin. We define non-GAAP operating income as operating income excluding expenses related to SBC, and, as applicable, other special items. Non-GAAP operating margin is defined as non-GAAP operating income divided by revenues. Google considers these non-GAAP financial measures to be useful metrics for management and investors because they exclude the effect of SBC, and as applicable, other special items so that Google’s management and investors can compare Google’s recurring core business operating results over multiple periods. Because of varying available valuation methodologies, subjective assumptions and the variety of award types that companies can use under FASB ASC Topic 718, Google’s management believes that providing a non-GAAP financial measure that excludes SBC allows investors to make meaningful comparisons between Google’s recurring core business operating results and those of other companies, as well as providing Google’s management with an important tool for financial and operational decision making and for evaluating Google’s own recurring core business operating results over different periods of time. There are a number of limitations related to the use of non-GAAP operating income versus operating income calculated in accordance with GAAP. First, non-GAAP operating income excludes some costs, namely, SBC, that are recurring. SBC has been and will continue to be for the foreseeable future a significant recurring expense in Google’s business. Second, SBC is an important part of our employees’ compensation. Third, the components of the costs that we exclude in our calculation of non-GAAP operating income may differ from the components that our peer companies exclude when they report their results of operations. Management compensates for these limitations by providing specific information regarding the GAAP amounts excluded from non-GAAP operating income and evaluating non-GAAP operating income together with operating income calculated in accordance with GAAP.

    Non-GAAP net income and EPS. We define non-GAAP net income as net income excluding expenses related to SBC and, as applicable, other special items less the related tax effects, as well as net income (loss) from discontinued operations. The tax effects of SBC and, as applicable, other special items are calculated using the tax-deductible portion of SBC, and, as applicable, other special items, and applying the entity-specific, U.S. federal and blended state tax rates.  We define non-GAAP EPS as non-GAAP net income divided by the weighted average outstanding shares, on a fully-diluted basis. We consider these non-GAAP financial measures to be useful metrics for management and investors for the same reasons that Google uses non-GAAP operating income and non-GAAP operating margin. However, in order to provide a complete picture of our recurring core business operating results, we exclude from non-GAAP net income and non-GAAP EPS the tax effects associated with SBC and, as applicable, other special items. Without excluding these tax effects, investors would only see the gross effect that excluding these expenses had on our operating results. The same limitations described above regarding Google’s use of non-GAAP operating income and non-GAAP operating margin apply to our use of non-GAAP net income and non-GAAP EPS. Management compensates for these limitations by providing specific information regarding the GAAP amounts excluded from non-GAAP net income and non-GAAP EPS and evaluating non-GAAP net income and non-GAAP EPS together with net income and EPS calculated in accordance with GAAP.

    Free cash flow. We define free cash flow as net cash provided by operating activities less capital expenditures. We consider free cash flow to be a liquidity measure that provides useful information to management and investors about the amount of cash generated by the business that, after the acquisition of property and equipment, including information technology infrastructure and land and buildings, can be used for strategic opportunities, including investing in our business, making strategic acquisitions, and strengthening the balance sheet. Analysis of free cash flow also facilitates management’s comparisons of our operating results to competitors’ operating results. A limitation of using free cash flow versus the GAAP measure of net cash provided by operating activities as a means for evaluating Google is that free cash flow does not represent the total increase or decrease in the cash balance from operations for the period because it excludes cash used for capital expenditures during the period. Our management compensates for this limitation by providing information about our capital expenditures on the face of the statement of cash flows and under the caption “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and Annual Report on Form 10-K. Google has computed free cash flow using the same consistent method from quarter to quarter and year to year.

    Non-GAAP international revenues. We define non-GAAP international revenues as international revenues excluding the impact of foreign exchange rate movements and hedging activities. Non-GAAP international revenues are calculated by translating current quarter revenues using prior quarter and prior year exchange rates, as well as excluding any hedging gains realized in the current quarter. We consider non-GAAP international revenues as a useful metric as it facilitates management’s internal comparison to our historical performance.

    The accompanying tables have more details on the non-GAAP financial measures that are most directly comparable to GAAP financial measures and the related reconciliations between these financial measures.

    Image via Google

  • Sophia Bush: ‘Chicago PD’ Star Calls Mariska Hargitay ‘Badass’

    Sophia Bush: ‘Chicago PD’ Star Calls Mariska Hargitay ‘Badass’

    Sophia Bush of Chicago PD fame has worked on screen with Law & Order: SVU star Mariska Hargitay in crossover episodes of their respective shows before, but it was during NBC Universal’s 2015 Winter TCA Tour last week that the two met up again.

    NBC advertises both Sophia Bush and Mariska Hargitay’s shows–along with The Mysteries of Laura, starring Debra Messing–as ‘woman crush Wednesdays,’ and it’s easy to see why. Each of the three cop shows features a good-looking, really sharp woman at its helm.

    The Chicago PD star paid the Law & Order: SVU star quite the compliment while they were together in L.A. last week, however. She referred to Mariska Hargitay (Olivia Benson on the show) as a ‘badass.’ She shared the comment as the caption of an Instagram post.

    “#fbf working with my idol @therealmariskahargitay who is now my friend (whaaaat?!) for the first time on @NBCSVU,” Sophia captioned, adding, “She’s the epitome of a badass. An example. And a courageous heart. #ilovemyjob #gratitude #pinchme #badbitches.”

    A photo posted by Sophia Bush (@sophiabush) on

    Sophia Bush is pretty ‘badass’ herself. In her role as Detective Erin Lindsay, she recently transferred from the Chicago Police Department to the FBI. However–and this is a spoiler alert–on Wednesday night’s episode she banged on her father figure, mentor, and former boss Hank Voight’s back door late and night, and asked for her job back.

    Fans didn’t expect–or at least they didn’t hope–that Erin Lindsay would stay away from her old stomping grounds for long.

    Are you a Chicago PD and/or a Law & Order: SVU fan? Which of these two female detectives–Sophia Bush or Mariska Hargitay–would you call the most ‘badass?’

  • Keshia Knight Pulliam: Fired For Not Calling Cosby

    Keshia Knight Pulliam: Fired For Not Calling Cosby

    Keshia Knight Pulliam was fired from Sunday night’s season premiere of The Celebrity Apprentice.

    The episode centered around a fundraising bake sale for charity. Keshia Knight Pulliam was the project lead for her team, but according to Donald Trump she didn’t make the right phone call that could have put her team over the edge.

    Pulliam made a pretty decent argument as to why she didn’t phone up her TV father from decades ago.

    “I have not talked to Bill Cosby on the phone in I don’t know how long,” she explained. “For me to pick up the phone having not talked to you for five years, except for when we run into each other for a Cosby event, I feel that’s not my place to do.”

    Just finished .@WendyWilliams now on to the next!!! #KampKizzy

    A photo posted by keshiaknightpulliam (@keshiaknightpulliam) on

    That makes sense to those of us who don’t like bugging friends and family for money.

    However, Trump wasn’t afraid to tell Keshia Knight Pulliam exactly what he thought of her consideration for Bill Cosby.

    He said, “You have this tremendous guy with this tremendous amount of money. And with one phone call you could have won this whole event.”

    Trump continued, “I really believe, if you’d called that gentleman, he would’ve helped you, even if you hadn’t spoken to him in years. Because you were an amazing team with one of the most successful shows ever, so I think it would have been a very quick call to make for charity…Keshia, you’re fired.”

    Ouch. The Trump firing is always a little painful for everyone, but it was especially cringe-worthy in light of recent events.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4n2myPZpnt4

    The episode with Keshia Knight Pulliam was filmed before all of the sex abuse accusations formed a dark cloud around Bill Cosby’s name, but Trump remains steadfast in his decision.

    That guy. Always the business man!

    What do you think of Keshia Knight Pulliam’s boot from the show last night? Who should be next?

  • Chris Rock And Wife Malaak Compton-Rock Call It Quits After Nearly 20 Years of Marriage

    Chris Rock And Wife Malaak Compton-Rock Call It Quits After Nearly 20 Years of Marriage

    Chris Rock and his wife are divorcing after nearly 20 years of marriage.

    “After much contemplation and 19 years of marriage, Chris and I have decided to go our separate ways,” Malaak Compton-Rock, founder of the nonprofit styleWorks, said in a statement Sunday. “Being fortunate enough to lead a life of service by working with those most vulnerable makes me well aware of life’s blessings, even when faced with difficulties.

    “While recognizing that this is a significant change, my children remain at the center of my life and their well-being is my top priority. It is in this spirit that I sincerely ask that their privacy and the privacy of our family be respected during this transition in our lives.”

    Robert S. Cohen, Rock’s attorney, confirmed the news.

    Chris Rock has filed for divorce from his wife, Malaak,” Cohen said in a statement. “This is a personal matter and Chris requests privacy as he and Malaak work through this process and focus on their family.”

    A source close to the couple, who have two daughters together, told People that “this was a long time coming. Chris has known it wasn’t salvageable for a while. He was the one to file because he knew it was time to just move forward already.”

    It has been a rocky road for the couple over the course of the past few years. In 2007, they shot down rumors that their marriage was on the rocks.

    “Though we have tried in the past to take the high road and not comment on the tabloid media, we find it necessary to express on record how unfortunate it is that the Daily News, specifically, and other tabloid outlets have chosen to print untrue rumors and lies about our family and marriage,” the couple said in a statement to People. “It is extremely hurtful to us, our children, and our extended family. We remain, as always, very happy and committed to our marriage and the beautiful family that we have built.”

  • Poison Center Calls Increase in States With Decriminalized Marijuana

    Poison Center Calls Increase in States With Decriminalized Marijuana

    With public opinion shifting on the issue of marijuana and some states already beginning to legalize the drug, it now seems inevitable that weed is destined to become a major industry in the U.S. Along with legitimization, however, will come a flood of regulations maintaining the sale and consumption of marijuana.

    A new study published in the Annals of Emergency Medicine is already shining a light on some of the consequences that could come from a more accepting stance toward marijuana. The study has found that in states where marijuana has been decriminalized, poison control center call rates have increased. Calls to poison control centers in such states were observed to increase by more than 30% between 2005 and 2011 in contrast to other states where control center calls remained steady.

    The calls aren’t coming from parents who have simply caught their teens smoking, however. The study’s authors instead believe that the greater availability of marijuana-infused foodstuffs in decriminalized states could be contributing the the call volume increase.

    “We believe that high-dose edible products – such as candies, cookies, and chocolates – may have played a significant role in the increased rate of reported exposure chiefly because kids can’t distinguish between products that contain marijuana and those that don’t,” said Dr. George Sam Wang lead author of the study and a researcher at the Rocky Mountain Poison and Drug Center. “These edible products may be attractive to children and tend to contain higher concentrations of the active ingredient, tetrahydrocannabinol.”

    So, it could be that children are unknowingly ingesting their parents’ pot brownies and exhibiting odd behavior, prompting calls to poison control and emergency room visits.

    Luckily it doesn’t appear that marijuana is actually poisonous. According to the study, the most common treatment for high children was IV fluids and no deaths were reported.

    Even though the cases were not fatal, the study’s authors still see the increased call volumes as a sign that more regulation may be needed for the burgeoning marijuana industry. Wang suggests that warning labels, child-resistant packaging, and public education may be necessary in the coming years.

  • Google Establishes New Call Center In Hyderabad

    Google Establishes New Call Center In Hyderabad

    India’s the second-most populous country in the world, and it looks like Google’s getting increasingly serious about acquiring customers there.  Today, Google opened a call center in Hyderabad designed to deal with local small and medium-sized businesses in any of four languages.

    Sridhar Seshadri, Google India’s head of online sales and operations, explained to the Press Trust of India, "India is a strategic market for Google.  We are looking to significantly invest in our efforts to maximise our reach and educate the Indian SMEs to gain from the benefits of online advertising."

    Seshadri also said, "The idea is to help them (SMEs) learn how to manage advertising campaigns online and grow their businesses by using our platform."

    GoogleThat should endear Google to the firms, perhaps leading more of them to use its tools.  And word-of-mouth recommendations could be bolstered by formal advertising campaigns, of course.

    Plus, Google’s encouraging growth to occur in another way, considering that the new call center is supposed to add support for at least four more languages (Bengali, Gujarati, Marathi, and Oriya on top of the initial set of Kannada, Malayalam, Tamil, and Telegu) sometime in the next several months.

    It should be interesting to see what sort of revenue Google’s able to generate in India, assuming the search giant is willing to break things down by country anytime soon.

  • Yahoo Opens Data Center, Call Center In Nebraska

    Yahoo Opens Data Center, Call Center In Nebraska

    Yahoo’s been busy in Nebraska.  This week, the company announced the opening of both a data center and a call center in the state, and apparently the celebration was a big deal, with Jerry Yang and several high(-ish) ranking politicians all showing up.

    Yahoo LogoIndeed, according to a post on Yodel Anecdotal, Jerry Yang, Nebraska Governor Dave Heineman, La Vista Mayor Douglas Kindig, Attorney General Jon Bruning, and Nebraska Congressman Lee Terry made appearances.  That’s not a bad turnout.

    As for some more substantial details relating to development, the data center is located in 180,000-square foot building, and the building is located in a small city called La Vista (hence Kindig’s involvement).  It’s expected to employ about 50 people, and without giving away any trade secrets, Yahoo’s implied that the data center’s rather "green," environmentally speaking.

    Not as much is known about the sales and customer support call center – it presumably took less time and money to set up, thereby attracting less attention – but it’s located in Omaha, and should help a few people earn paychecks, too.

    One possible interpretation of all this activity is that Yahoo’s very optimistic about its future even as Microsoft’s stepping in to influence the search and advertising side of things.